© 2020 MOTORSPORT NETWORK. All rights reserved.
Sign up to receive latest updates for Ferrari News, Threads, and Classifieds
Discussion in 'F1' started by SPEEDCORE, Jun 10, 2018.
That is, besides very rude, poor defense.
Explain why Armstrong had to give back his Tour de France wins.
The championship should have been handed to Massa, even if it was a year later.
FIA sucks, we all know it.
And they made a mistake because renault cheated, making both cars pit at the same time wich prompted the mistake that most likely would never had hapened under normal circunstances...like it or not, the cheating by Renault alterad the normal unveiling of events that day.
Difference: If they excluded Alonso or Piquet as they did with Armstrong Massa would not be Champion either.
With Armstrong they simply excluded the result of this single driver and they did not neutralize every single stage he won to make a result as these stages never happened....So Armstrongs exclusion is not comparable with what you suggest.
That's correct... but why don't they give the win to the second best? Admit, it is not fair.
I they give the win to the second it would be Rosberg winning with Hamilton second and Massa still no points....so Hamilton would have even more points...
we all know that if justice was to be served the race would have to be excluded from the championship..it's as simple as that....the problem was not opnly the winner but the facty that Piquet accident changed the whole race.