Ground effect, turbos set for F1 return | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Ground effect, turbos set for F1 return

Discussion in 'F1' started by william, Sep 3, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. patricko

    patricko Formula Junior

    Aug 30, 2005
    532
    Huntington Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Patrick O'Neill
    Why don't they just go straight to electric and skip this step? You all know that is where this path leads.
     
  2. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 3, 2006
    28,041

    Apart from an additional category in some form of motor racing, I can't really see GP adopting electric in the near future. Some form of hybrid technology maybe.

    That would certainly kill the enthusiam for the sport.
    Fancy watching a race with vacuum cleaners!!

    There are electric motorcycles at the Isle of Mann TT, and also at Bonneville, and electric boats exist too. Impressive machines, but not providing the thrill of combustion engines. But they will have their followers for sure, just like there are steam buffs.
     
  3. 4rePhill

    4rePhill F1 Veteran

    Oct 18, 2009
    8,292
    Worcester, England
    Full Name:
    Phill J
    Pure electric vehicles are not the future for racing cars or for road cars.

    Living in California I would have though you would already have experienced the big drawback with electric power, and that is generating it. Like it or not, electric power is not as green as some people like to think and is gradually becoming more and more in short supply.

    If anything, I would say they'd go with Hydrogen power (provided it could be stored safely enough to be safe in a racing accident). Before that, you're more likely to see diesel F1 first!. :(
     
  4. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    http://www.formula1journal.com/2010/09/2013-technical-regulations-by-flood1.html

    If this actually goes through (particularly the engine bit) then I and many other Formula 1 fans will be through with the sport. I am so sick of limiting everything...I don't have a problem with shaking up things but let them play with it rather than limit RPMS, etc.

    Personally, I think that the engine freeze is one of the worst things to happen to F1 in a long time.
     
  5. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Feb 18, 2007
    9,768
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian

    I don't see any substance behind this article, especially the engine bit - all the author does is list the technologies the manufacturers have in their road cars...
     
  6. TifosiUSA

    TifosiUSA F1 Veteran

    Nov 18, 2007
    8,468
    Kansas City, MO
    Full Name:
    DJ
    I hear you but in the here and now of ridiculous Eco-Nazism and PC I fear that F1 is heading down the toilet.

    ...and YES the sound is a huge part of F1.
     
  7. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    43,217
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    Motor racing less noisy? GTFO!!! Why? Use earplugs!!! ;) Maybe F1 could dial it down 1 or 2 decibels (the honda engines actually did hurt my ears when they where still racing), the rest was acceptable :).

    Actually, this post made me realize that there is a good sounding 4 cilinder...:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bjou0zRJZBE

    :)
     
  8. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,913
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    No worries. Remember F1's sole purpose is a giant marketing exercise and that only works if the fans like it. They're not going down a path that would make actually sense from a road car development perspective nor a path that is PC/green. They will pick what creates the best show.

    All these changes are discussion points to see how the teams, the companies, the fans and the press react. Then they will choose something.

    Also keep in mind how Mosley negotiated change: He picked the most extreme/worst scenario, let the teams get all upset about it and then came their way getting what he really wanted. I assume Todt will operate similarly. Max was a moron, but he knew how to get his way and Todt I'm sure will get his will as well.
     
  9. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    107,741
    Vegas baby
    Formula ABBA.
     
  10. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,913
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    #35 tifosi12, Sep 5, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  11. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 3, 2006
    28,041

    Well, in case you don't know, there is such thing as noise pollution, which is increasingly coming under the radar and threatens a lot of activities.

    Excessive noise is harmfull and can leave lasting effect. It is dangerous to your health. So imagine what it is like for people who have to suffer it without choice, because they live in the vicinity of a race track.

    Maybe you haven't heard about the increasing pressure airports, arlines and aircraft manufacturers are coming under to reduce noise.

    The same goes for motor racing. Already several tracks have come under scrutiny and had to reduce their activities.

    The problem isn't new: Brooklands track in Surrey, England, was already enforcing noise abatement and imposing silencers on races cars in the 30s, after the authorities gave the organisers the choice between tackling the problem or closing the track.
    In Britain, we have already lost several tracks near habitations because of noise pollution and the impossibility to reduce it.
    Our hillclimbs and sprint course only survive because they adopted a strict anti-noise policy.

    It's not only in England. The Monthlhery circuit in France closed down because of noise related complaints. Monza and Misano in Italy are under threats and had to reduce the number of racing days, etc...

    So there is no point adopting the ostrich policy and burrying your head in the sand: noise restriction is coming - like it or not!
     
  12. Alexweav79

    Alexweav79 Formula Junior

    Jan 10, 2009
    359
    Owensville, MO
    Full Name:
    Alex Weaver
    #37 Alexweav79, Sep 5, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 5, 2010
    Are they 'going green' to attract more viewers? So then I have to ask, do they really believe they are going to get more viewers by 'going green'? Going green is the stupidest thing I hear in F1.

    I know very high levels of power can be achieved by 4 cylinder turbos, but come on, wouldn't we rather see them allow V10's and V12's again? Or if they want turbos, atleast allow 6 cylinders...Allow them all! Just get away from engine freeze and spec # of cylinders, etc.

    I'm one of those that is very tired of all the restrictions. IT'S F1!!!!!



    Alex
     
  13. mousecatcher

    mousecatcher Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2007
    2,116
    san mateo, ca
    Oh please. For the folks that live in the vicinity of a track, they are so far away that there is no health danger. It's just a nuisance issue. (Which is a legitimate issue.)
     
  14. Tifosi15

    Tifosi15 Formula 3

    Jul 15, 2009
    2,125
    Austin
    Full Name:
    Bryan
    As much as I agree with you that was then, and this is now. PC and going green isn't about logic, it's what those people want to hear.
     
  15. flood1

    flood1 Rookie

    Sep 5, 2010
    1
    Hi Guys. The point of the article was to combine the technical regs, regs that have been leaking out of the technical working groups, with a rationale of why that would satisfy the manufacturers. My point was to find the link between road car technology and F1's future.

    We are all asking "why" this particular path, and I was trying to answer that question. I think the answer to "why" is because it matches the manufacturers vision of the future, whether we fans like it or not. I am convinced that this will be the car of tomorrow, but I do not know if the interior details of the engine will be free or frozen. But I am convinced that the number of cylinders and the displacement will be.

    Thanks for you time. Forza Ferrari!
     
  16. lmunz22

    lmunz22 Formula 3

    Jan 16, 2007
    1,224
    With rare exceptions, I am sure that the racetrack was there first, and they made the choice to move there, knowing full well what the track meant in terms of noise...
     
  17. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    It will, or they will be hydrogen powered.

    I don't see a problem myself. No point racing oil powered cars when everything else moves by something else, that would make F1 a TV show only and not be related to technology at all.

    The races in the movie Star Wars (can't remember which one) looked like good fun ...
    Pete
     
  18. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    #43 PSk, Sep 6, 2010
    Last edited: Sep 6, 2010
    Understood, but oneday we will all go mad in the silence, or because of the lack of challenging activities to involve oneself in. All sports make noise, and I for one want to LIVE my life not just get to a ripe old age and be satisfied I made it.

    Think of your children, not being allowed to experience anything ... that is the end result of all this OVER controlling by big brother.
    Pete
     
  19. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    43,217
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    I know full well of these noise complaints. 99.9% are made by idiots who move next to a track because the house/flat was cheap and then all they do for the next couple of years ring up to complain whenever they hear a noise. I can understand it if a race track has just been build next to your home, but fact of the matter is, most tracks have been there LONG before the people moved there.

    Classic case in point: Zandvoort. Circuit Zandvoort has been there for over 60 years now, and right now it can only have 3 'noise' weekends a year. Trackdays are very limited, very few a year. Why? Because some old hag, whose life hasn't turned out exactly how she wanted to, but still wanted to move close to the sea, could only afford a small flat which was close to the race track. She and 3 others are the only persons calling to complain about the noise.

    I'm sorry, but unless you've lived there BEFORE the track was there, STFU and watch grass grow. Straight execution is necessary I'm afraid. Old people are evil ;)
     
  20. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,899
    Same with Jarama: it was in the middle of nowhere until someone decided to build houses there, who knows why, probably because there is a golf club too or something like that.

    Although, truth must be told, Jarama was dead anyways because it is old, narrow and dirty.
     
  21. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 3, 2006
    28,041

    Excessive levels of noise is a health issue for those working in the motorsport industry, and even a nuisance can affect your health - sleep deprivation for instance?
     
  22. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 3, 2006
    28,041

    That may be true, but with urbanism developement, circuits that used to be in the middle of nowhere end up being in the middle of dwellings and their activities create problems for the people around.

    The argument that "they moved there knowingly" often doesn't stand against costly litigation. In the end, I think that the right to live in peace wins against the right to play with noisy toys!

    This issue exists in several countries that I know of. So people would prefer to ignore it at their peril and at the risk of harming the sport.

    It's not stupid for the FIA to be pre-emptive and introduce noise limits in F1, to protect the sport.
     
  23. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Jun 3, 2006
    28,041

    That may be true, but with urbanism developement, circuits that used to be in the middle of nowhere end up being in the middle of dwellings and their activities create problems for the people around.

    The argument that "they moved there knowingly" often doesn't stand against costly litigation. In the end, I think that the right to live in peace wins against the right to play with noisy toys!

    This issue exists in several countries that I know of. So people would prefer to ignore it at their peril and at the risk of harming the sport.

    It's not stupid for the FIA to be pre-emptive and introduce noise limits in F1, to protect the sport.
     
  24. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    43,217
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    In cases like this, they also receive the right to get told to F**k off.
     
  25. oss117

    oss117 F1 Rookie

    Jan 26, 2006
    4,185
    Plantation, Florida
    Full Name:
    Alfredo
    Agree 100%
     

Share This Page