GTC4 Lusso V RR Sport SVR | FerrariChat

GTC4 Lusso V RR Sport SVR

Discussion in 'FF/Lusso' started by Scraggy, Dec 1, 2016.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Scraggy

    Scraggy Formula 3

    Apr 2, 2012
    2,068
    England
    Full Name:
    Scraggy
    I am pondering whether I am taking leave off my senses buying a GTC 4 which will lose the value of an RR SVR in the first 12 months meaning the SVR is basically "free".

    For those who have not driven an SVR its incredible.

    I wonder if the GTC is competing with anything or is in a segment of one......

    Thoughts.....

    The SVR has a magical V8, really characterful and more than powerful enough, far better sound and drama than GTC
    SVR drives incredibly, but not like a Ferrari, even a soft 4 seat Ferrari
    Build quality - similar, maybe SVR better as higher levels of automation and feedback
    Accommodation - SVR far more comfortable, far more practical
    Sound and systems - dead heat, 2017 SVR has new GPS kit (old kit was terrible) and the Meridien 1700 watt far superior
    Gearbox - Ferrari superior as DSG versus auto
    Steering feel - GTC too light and SVR outstanding maybe over centres a touch
    SVR feels safer
    Pano roof - available in either
    Being high up is cool
    New three layer colours in SVR are half price of Ferrari equivalent
    Residuals as % - dead heat
    Many non Ferrarista think FF/GTC is ugly (we don't see it as brand has us and are swayed by tech)

    But its "not" a Ferrari and they are prolific.....but really, is it worth 3XL for a well specced GTC?

    SVR plus basic 488 ?

    Why are people buying a "practical" Ferrari when they could have an SVR and a "proper" Ferrari ?

    Even I am thinking of doing so.
     
  2. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,729
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    Trade the SVR every 6 months for a new one and actually make money.

    F12 as second car until the F12M comes along.
     
  3. Maximus1973

    Maximus1973 Formula 3

    Oct 29, 2016
    1,541
    I'm on my first RR after driving Cayenne's.

    Never ever, ever, ever again a RR!
    What a poorly excuse for a high end car. Worst car I have ever owned in terms of reliability. I'm back to the new Cayenne when it's being launched or the new E63s that just got launched.

    I'm sure you're pulling a late Halloween prank here. An SVR against a GTC. Never in a million years. Apples vs pears my friend.

    You'll be glad I never get the change to say "told you so"!
     
  4. leopoldo

    leopoldo Formula Junior

    Mar 10, 2013
    702
    Full Name:
    mark1
    i Don't understand how is possible to compare a range rover vs a Ferrari v12 ...
     
  5. F2003-GA

    F2003-GA F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Nov 2, 2003
    13,376
    Sunbelt
    Full Name:
    Bro
    Exactly :confused:
     
  6. F12KID

    F12KID F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Nov 27, 2013
    2,578
    RR is absolute utter rubbish not even owned by British any longer ---- if I'm not mistaken the SVR has the jaguar V8 that makes loads of annoying crackling sounds.....

    @scraggy.....what on earth has got into you??
     
  7. dustman

    dustman F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jun 12, 2007
    11,439
    Horrible ride quality and lets not start on reliability for RR.

    Get the Porsche. Or get an F12 at what are good prices today.
     
  8. Caeruleus11

    Caeruleus11 F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Jun 11, 2013
    11,619
    You're not crazy to wonder this. But in the end the comparison is nearly impossible because a Ferrari is a dream. And just about any other car is not going to be as special, it will be more ordinary. Now, for some of us, we want something more ordinary for a daily car.

    I think your ordinary daily car could be this or fill in the blank with a whole host of other great choices. In my case, I like having a large BMW sedan for taking the kids to school and activities and in my area it draws no attention, which I appreciate. And another thing about your SUV is it has 4 doors. If you are going to use the backseats (children?) then its so much easier. The two door format does not work as well as a 4 door with drop offs and pick ups of children.

    I can put the BMW away when those activities are done the Ferrari can come out! I like the post that suggests get something and an F12.

    Now that I've mentioned all of this, I can't help but to still day dream about the GTC4... Maybe when my kids are driving themselves.... Like I said, Ferrari is a dream. And any day you can enjoy the dream is a good day....

    One final consideration: I think GTC ownership likely to be a prerequisite for whatever the next LE car will be. There are no guarantees but the depreciation might not be as bad when you factor this.
     
  9. uhn2000

    uhn2000 Formula 3

    Oct 15, 2011
    2,128
    Toronto
    Full Name:
    Joe
    Frankly speaking there is nothing better then daily driving a V12 Ferrari. I think life is short and why not enjoy as many moments as possible in this incredible machine. We have a Cayenne Turbo as the wife and weekend car and it's a good ride but absolutely nothing compared to the FF or GTC. Small things make the experience standout in the FF - the thumbs up and smiles everywhere, amazing interior experience, the smile you get walking up to it, the dual personalities, and the usability in all moments. I love it so much that being stuck in standstill traffic is not the end of the world. SVR is ok and the 488 is cool but both combined are still no GTC.

    BTW depreciation is such a wierd thing, it's not as much as people think. Don't let that freak you out because percentage wise you will lose more on a non Ferrari any day.

    Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
     
  10. islandtrader

    islandtrader Formula Junior

    Jun 30, 2013
    369
    I actually have a rr sport and a ff. I like the RR as a truck to move things. It's not a Ferrari and should not be compared.

    Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
     
  11. Scraggy

    Scraggy Formula 3

    Apr 2, 2012
    2,068
    England
    Full Name:
    Scraggy
    I have an F12 !

    LE eligibility did cross mind !

    Thanks for posts !
     
  12. Scraggy

    Scraggy Formula 3

    Apr 2, 2012
    2,068
    England
    Full Name:
    Scraggy
    Those comparing a normal RR not SVR need to try the SVR and read reviews, its not like an RRS.
     
  13. Maximus1973

    Maximus1973 Formula 3

    Oct 29, 2016
    1,541
    Screw the reviews. Talk to actual owners. Journalists drive press cars for a weekend. This brand has let me and friends down on several occaisions.

    Besides, driving an RR Sport will make you feel sorry everytime you get in the car for not buying a proper RR. The Sport feels and looks like a fashion whim next to a real RR.

    If you want that combo of speed, space and comfort, get an Audi RS6, M5 or E63s.
     
  14. deltona

    deltona Formula 3

    Aug 7, 2009
    1,386
    UK
    Full Name:
    Justin
    #14 deltona, Dec 2, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2016
    The SVR is a great car in its class but you can't compare it to an FF. I have an FF and love it, but it will be replaced by an F12 next year as the rear seats just aren't getting enough use, IF I used the rear seats more I wouldn't sell it, and certainly not for any SUV. We have a Cayenne and Macan in the household, both great cars in their sector.

    I'm not a RR guy. I get while people like them but dynamically they don't do it, even the SVR, just trying to hide its mass, but not successfully in my opinion. I also don't like the image of the car. There are plenty of yummy mummy types driving them where I live, it's a bit of a look at me in my trendy SUV, leased to the max!

    Also an SVR in 3 or 4 years will depreciate heavily just like most Range Rovers do. I reckon you'd lose a lot less getting a used FF and running that for the same period.
     
  15. Lukeylikey

    Lukeylikey F1 Rookie
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 3, 2012
    3,663
    UK
    Not sure I agree with that. The British own plenty of Land Rover product. We have a recently acquired RR 4.4 V8 Autobiography, which replaced a 3.0 sport. Didn't much like the sport but absolutely love the full fat RR. This is because the engine is torquey, nice sounding and relaxed, the ride is plush and the interior is beautifully appointed. Plus, it is a proper off-roader and carries four in sublime comfort.

    My problem with the sport is that it is one thing, trying to add elements of another, and ends up not being the best at either. The SVR only enhances that feeling. The RR celebrates its SUV-ness and doesn't attempt to be sporting. It works great (and reliably).

    The trick the FF/GTC4 pulls off is that its attempts to offer the benefits of four seats and AWD don't undermine its sporting GT nature very much. Yes, to a degree, but that degree does not make the car pointless as a sports car experience. Whereas the sport and SVR really are a little pointless. The only exception is if you are a one-car guy and you do a lot of miles, some of them off road.

    The GTC4 can never be justified by cost alone - you have to want the car that combines a sporting and absorbing drive, with the world's best engine, and more practicality and all-year round usability, better than any other in automotive history. And for all that you will pay.
     
  16. Scraggy

    Scraggy Formula 3

    Apr 2, 2012
    2,068
    England
    Full Name:
    Scraggy
    Good points we have an RR Autobiography and yes it makes you wonder why one gets a Rolls Royce for 3XL, in fact similar debate to the one above.

    Some comments above very ignorant. Britain is rubbish at owning car companies for sure but as a class is second only to Germany in automotive and of course dominates F1. RR/Jaguar is a fabulous success in automotive terms and provides jobs and security for many deprived communities.
     
  17. Scraggy

    Scraggy Formula 3

    Apr 2, 2012
    2,068
    England
    Full Name:
    Scraggy
    Overall very helpful comments especially that eg RS6 a better alternative.

    Guess I just have sticker shock at my pounds 310k GTC ! Trying to buy too many depreciating assets as get older ! Inner cautious chimp takes over.

    But its a beauty.
     
  18. F12KID

    F12KID F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Nov 27, 2013
    2,578
    Sorry, meant current owner of JLR ;-)

    I've had 2 RR autobiography, one of which we returned to LR for full refund after 16 months otherwise i was going to sue them [emoji4]
     
  19. DeSoto

    DeSoto F1 Veteran

    Nov 26, 2003
    7,794
    At first I thought that RR was for Rolls-Royce. Comparing a Rolls and a Ferrari is already strange, but comparing it to a Range Rover is quite far fetched.
     
  20. luckyguy

    luckyguy Karting

    Nov 18, 2016
    101
    venice italy
    Just bought RR sport autobio for my wife, gtc4 for me.

    I feel the 2 car are quite nice to be on the same house, just no reason to compare, no matter the svr version, will always big a fast suv.

    Go gtc4lusso, i feel RR Svr is a fast car, gtc4lusso is a dream
     
  21. Maximus1973

    Maximus1973 Formula 3

    Oct 29, 2016
    1,541
    I too have a RR Autobiography V8 diesel (best engine for an SUV) as a daily driver/van.
    Wish I would have opted for an Cayenne, RS6 or AMG. More fun and way more reliable.

    Although the RR is comfortable, it is not reliable and not fun as a dd.
    Especialy since my other cars are various exotics, my driver style doesn't fit driver such a heavy suv any more.

    Of course, all this discussion is stricly personal and on a Ferrari forum, so we're all very biased. Driving the various cars should quickly sort out with car you'll end up with.
    The SVR will btw depreciate much faster then a tastefully specced GTC or RS6. Whatever the choice you're going with, common sense has no place here. If you can afford the various options, it's an emotional desicion. So leave out common sense.
     
  22. Bas

    Bas Four Time F1 World Champ

    Mar 24, 2008
    42,729
    ESP
    Full Name:
    Bas
    Guys, he's talking about getting a RR AND a Ferrari, not one or the other.

    Cayenne is a great car but lose a lot of value in a short term. In the UK the RR SVR actually goes up in value. A friend of mine swaps his SVR's every 6 months and gets a new one. Keeps making money on them.

    That's why I'd get an SVR and a nearly new F12, best of both worlds IMO. V12 Ferrari and a crazy SUV.
     
  23. deltona

    deltona Formula 3

    Aug 7, 2009
    1,386
    UK
    Full Name:
    Justin
    #23 deltona, Dec 2, 2016
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2016
    I think you'll find that the bubble has burst. Land Rover will pump out what ever demand there is and buyers will pay for that when the car is 3 years old. Assuming there was a waiting time for an SVR keeping up residuals it won't last and in my opinion is certainly not a reason to buy one.
     
  24. F12KID

    F12KID F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Nov 27, 2013
    2,578


    Same car except motor if I'm not mistaken. It's TATA-owned rubbish
     
  25. uhn2000

    uhn2000 Formula 3

    Oct 15, 2011
    2,128
    Toronto
    Full Name:
    Joe
    Wonderful statement, could not agree more!

    Sent from my HTC 10 using Tapatalk
     

Share This Page