How far behind is McLaren ? | Page 14 | FerrariChat

How far behind is McLaren ?

Discussion in 'F1' started by william, Mar 21, 2015.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. classic308

    classic308 F1 Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    6,820
    Location:
    Westchester, NY
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Its just plain silly IMHO to try and gauge whether the gap has been closed based on free practice times. In qualifying, where it mmatters, they are three seconds slower than MB. I was one of the guys pulling for them to do well but after three weeks off they haven't made any real progress as far as qualifying speeds go.
     
  2. ARTNNYC

    ARTNNYC F1 Rookie Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,795
    Location:
    Bonita Springs, FL
    Full Name:
    Jerome
    3 seconds off the pole time is not much improvement. Just for giggles what was their best time last year with Merc power?
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2015
  3. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2003
    Messages:
    4,378
    Location:
    Cheshire
    +1. 3 seconds delta is hopeless. The upgrades have not delivered. McLaren inquest needs to get going ASAP. Not impressed.
     
  4. nsxrebel

    nsxrebel Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,907
    You guys act like McLaren are still qualifying 19th and 20th. I guess if they're not fighting for pole position, they are not improving. smfh
     
  5. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2003
    Messages:
    4,378
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Actually no. I am comparing Bahrain to Spain. The net impact of the massive
    McLaren upgrade has been a loss of 0.5 seconds in pace vs Merc. Which ever way you cut it, they have lost time. How can that be deemed progress? It isn't, it's a disgrace.
     
  6. Axecent

    Axecent Formula 3

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,112
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Full Name:
    John
    First year back...I say Mulligan is due.
     
  7. ARTNNYC

    ARTNNYC F1 Rookie Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,795
    Location:
    Bonita Springs, FL
    Full Name:
    Jerome
    I too am quite disappointed with McLarens performance as I thought the first race in Europe would have seen better results for them. lets see how they do in the race
     
  8. nsxrebel

    nsxrebel Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,907
    If it's a 0.5 second loss to Merc, what does that tell you about the other teams McLaren have passed in performance? They are now ahead of Sauber, Force India, and Marussia(Manor?)

    McLaren wasn't the only team that came with upgrades. Mercedes and the rest of the teams all brought upgrades.
     
  9. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2003
    Messages:
    4,378
    Location:
    Cheshire
    Those tail end Charlie's aren't the teams that McLaren benchmarks against, but if it makes it easier for you to take the pain then I see your point of view.
     
  10. ARTNNYC

    ARTNNYC F1 Rookie Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,795
    Location:
    Bonita Springs, FL
    Full Name:
    Jerome
    Alonso done!
     
  11. sp1der

    sp1der F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3,007
    Location:
    UK
    Full Name:
    Simon Ashley
    Maybe the size zero package referred to zero points?
     
  12. ARTNNYC

    ARTNNYC F1 Rookie Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2005
    Messages:
    3,795
    Location:
    Bonita Springs, FL
    Full Name:
    Jerome
    God that was a depressing race for McLaren....Button was quoted as saying he does not even expect McLaren to score A championship point this year
     
  13. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,890
    McLaren can't blame engine development for brake failure ...
     
  14. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2002
    Messages:
    17,673
    Location:
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    It was the energy recovery unit that failed not the wheel brakes. The energy recovery unit also brakes the car.
    Pete
     
  15. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ Owner

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    41,693
    Location:
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Just ask Mercedes.
    Macca wasn't the only team with brake issues today.
     
  16. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,890
    Something is wrong with that technology, if a driver cannot even stop his car in its allocated spot in the pit lane.
    I am sure he would have no problem doing that in an "ordinary" car.
    I am baffled by so much reliance on seemingly unproven systems, and blame the ridiculous ban on testing for delaying their operational efficiency.

    I am glad the FIA isn't in charge of certifying new aircraft !
     
  17. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    107,106
    Location:
    Vegas baby
    Finishing ahead of Marussia is nothing to be proud of. "Hey! At least we aren't dead last! Those guys really suck!"
     
  18. william

    william Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2006
    Messages:
    27,890
    Realistically, I consider all the 2015 GPs as test sessions for McLaren.

    That's what these silly rules have achieved.
     
  19. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ Owner

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    41,693
    Location:
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Agreed. Instead of dumping on McLaren and Honda we should be thankful that they even bother with F1.
     
  20. TheMayor

    TheMayor Ten Time F1 World Champ Rossa Subscribed

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2008
    Messages:
    107,106
    Location:
    Vegas baby

    Uh... no. For a year we heard how Mac and Honda were going to crush everyone with the engineering of McLaren and the power of Honda. You can say the new regs make it difficult but McLaren screwed it's testing program time in the off season with horrible unreliability.

    The Mac's were mid pack cars last year with Merc power -- the worst of the Merc powerplant cars. Everyone blamed the season on the effort they were putting into the new car so it could run with the best right out of the box.

    Sorry, I find it ironic that instead of moving forward, they moved backwards. But that's what too much hype will do for you. Sometimes you just can't live up to the level of "the legend".
     
  21. IamRobG

    IamRobG F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    4,092
    Location:
    NY
    You can't succeed if you don't try. What's the point of being mid pack with the same setup as last year. Who cares about the 2nd best. Swing for the fences. Sometimes you hit a home run, sometimes you just beat Marussia.
     
  22. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ Owner

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    41,693
    Location:
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    Heard from whom? Macca and Honda consistently said that results wouldn't be immediate.

    Honda came to the track with a PU in half the time the other teams had. I wonder what the MB, Ferrari or Renault unit was like at a similar stage of development.

    Two steps foward one step back. Progress is rarely linear.
     
  23. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Messages:
    23,478
    Location:
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    The point is, everyone got extremely over excited with the partnership of Mclaren and Honda again. Too soon that everyone has forgotten that when they were in F1 in the 2000s, embarrassingly, they just has one GP win to their name (Hungary 2006).

    So, i never understood, not just here, but multiple forums when people started speculating how advanced and far Mclaren Honda are going to go. They are still stuck in the late 1980s success. That's the fact.

    Realistically, Honda's venture in F1 (1999-2008) can be deemed as a failure, and people have overlooked it.

    As someone posted above, Mclaren have moved back, not forward with Honda.
     
  24. nsxrebel

    nsxrebel Formula 3

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Messages:
    1,907
    You heard, but NOT from McLaren or Honda. I had my doubts that McHonda would be at the tip of the spear this year, certainly after winter testing. Yes, a lot of people jumped the gun predicting dominance just like in the 80's. Those of us with a more realistic outlook knew better. Yes, it's been rough start, but there has been progress, albeit slow, but progress nonetheless. Reliability seems to be the biggest problem for McHonda at the moment. Alonso was running as high as 7th today before he had brake/ERS problems. Just getting into the final points is possible with their pace if they can sort the reliability issues.
     
  25. subirg

    subirg F1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2003
    Messages:
    4,378
    Location:
    Cheshire
     

Share This Page