How to avoid this situation?

Quoting someone is directing a comment/question to that person.

I didn’t miss any posts.

“Encouraging” means a second person agreed with and supported another person in their viewpoint, which isn’t something Yin (representing FChat) did (he was the other guy you put in the multiquote involving me); or, suggesting other people should behave in the same fashion.
Perhaps the term you are looking for is “promulgating,” which you could accuse Gino of doing.
I didn’t personally attack you: I asked you why you needed me to point out obvious stuff to you (after you dragged me into it by quoting me), and then offered a plausible explanation—that you may be dizzy from spinning.

 

I think some people just need to get off their moral high horse. You don't like it, you speak up. Still don't like it, use the ignore button like I did. There is no need for personal character attack whatsoever. We are too old in our life, earn what we have earned, needed a break and come onto internet to shoot breeze and have fun. Suddenly a priest came on and started preaching humanity based on some stupid jokes. Something is really off if the word "inhumanity" can come out in this thread. Geez.

 

I was ironic, in the hope to stop there actually! What’s the point in discussing with those who defend the right to hate talks? Or to impose “hanging” or “breaking teeth” as hyperbolic language? There’s no hope.

A guy, popular or not, is using violent words, I personally feel that it is not recommendable to fill the internet with anonymous hate talks, and then some other folks bully with him and kid on me and call me a preacher and ask if I live in the land of puppies and I can’t remeber what other b******t.

Frankly, this has gotten nonsense.

Especially for one reason: this forum is read by countless people, and surely among the readers there are kids, boys, and young wanna be Ferrari owners.

And one day my daughter will read it too - if I don’t get fed up with too many users by then.

So what kind of messages are we spreading?

Is anonymity truly a right to word out the worst in the hope to be fun, or should we take responsibility of what we write and always be decent?

Anyhow I promise I stop here. I have enough.

Ciao.
Nic

 

No one said you can't have a different opinion or express it, including opinion about how or what others post. We call that "peer moderation" here. What you were warned about is "escalation". The first or second steps of escalation might or might not violate our moderation standards. But escalation often results in crossing the line, such as telling other users they're idiots or should FOAD (**** off and die) or the like. Those will get you sanctions.

 

Nic, please stop with the holier than thou BS. You are entitled to your opinion just as others are entitled to express their opinion, even if it offends you. We can all follow our own moral compass without your guidance.

This is a great place to hang out and have fun and discuss Ferrari's and life but trying to elevate everyone to your standard will not go over well. You know what they say about opinions and A-holes, right? Everyone has one and they all stink.

 

No need to get worked up over this. Posts were getting ugly and Nico was trying to dial it back, which I appreciate. But for some reason this has veered into discussions about morality.

now let’s get back to our favorite topic, people sitting, spitting, scratching, stepping on Ferraris

 

Let's go! What if it is this hot girl on your car vs that apparently gender neutral individual in op's post?

What would you do differently and why? Honest answer.
Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

Ummm.. you **** the one on the right and you beat the one on the left with a stick until they get off your car.

...unless I'm missing something here...