http://www.forbes.com/lifestyle/2005/08/17/ferrari-exoticleasing-luxurycars-cz_jf_0817feat_ls.html Richard Sirota, a 52-year-old private investor with real estate and technology company holdings, owns 15 cars, including a Ferrari Farina coupe, a Ferrari 328 GTS and an Aston Martin DB4. But when he wanted a new Ferrari 612 Scaglietti, he didn't want to sell one of his cars--or pony up $250,000--to buy it outright. So he leased it through Premier Financial Services, one of a handful of leasing companies that specialize in exotic cars. "For people like me who are always in and out of cars, it's perfect," Sirota says. "It allows you to not tie up a lot of capital, and you can get out of the lease at any time." Sirota has leased about a dozen exotic cars over the last decade, most from Premier Financial Services. In 1998, the company's first full year of operation, Woodbury, Conn.-based Premier Financial Services originated $7 million in leases. This year, President and Chief Executive Mitchell Katz says he expects to originate $100 million worth. "We're dealing with the sexiest vehicles in the world, and you don't have to write a giant check to get them," Katz says. "They are not as unattainable as people might think." Putnam Leasing, a Greenwich, Conn.-based rival of Premier Financial Services, which also says it originates about $100 million per year, has had similar success. "Every year we are waiting for the bubble to burst," says Steven Posner, president of Putnam Leasing. "And every month keeps getting better and better." The reason, says Posner: "We allow people to buy more car for less money, and people like assets that they can look at and enjoy." Both Putnam and Premier offer leases on new exotic cars through dealerships, and classic cars sold privately or at auction. The plans range from two to five years, but, unlike traditional car leases, they are lease-to-own programs. At the end of the lease term, the driver owes a balloon payment. He can pay it and keep the car, or offer it back to the dealer--or to another buyer--and pay the balloon with the proceeds (pocketing the difference in the occasional event that the car is worth more than the payment). Katz recently offered a 60-month lease on a $200,000, 2005 Ferrari F430 Coupe to a customer for $2,493 per month after $10,000 down, with a balloon payment of $100,000 after five years. He estimates an outright purchase would run closer to $4,000 per month with a similar down payment and interest rate--and most banks would require a much higher down payment. Another difference between these leases and traditional ones is that these leases can be terminated at any time without the kind of penalty one would pay with a lease on, say, a Cadillac through General Motors (nyse: GM - news - people ). Often, exotic car lessees will agree to a three-year or five-year lease without ever intending to hold onto the car that long. "We deal with fickle people," says Posner. There still can be a hidden cost, though, warns Katz. The leasing companies borrow from a bank at one interest rate and offer the lease at a higher one to the driver, making money on the spread. Some lease agreements, when terminated early, will credit the bank's interest fees back to the driver for the unused term of the lease, but the leasing company will keep its spread from the entire term. Katz says his program, which he calls "The PFS Simple Lease" refunds all interest charges to the driver if the driver wants to get out of the lease early. He says he provides the amortization schedule to the customer to prove there are no hidden costs. There are also tax advantages. Most states allow buyers to pay sales tax monthly on the lease amount instead of the full purchase price of the vehicle, so buyers avoid a giant sales-tax bill the day they drive away--quickly--in their new Maserati. Also, if the car is used for business purposes, it is eligible for a writeoff. "It's the cleanest writeoff there is," Posner says. "And a lot of our customers use it." This is not to say leasing an exotic car is cheap. There are no 1.9% lease deals offered on exotic cars or $399-per-month specials. Katz says he's offering interest rates "in the sevens" these days. Katz recently offered this deal to a customer on a 1956 Mercedes-Benz Gullwing: For $50,000 down on the car, valued at $350,000, a 60-month lease would run $4,024 per month. Just the financing would cost in the neighborhood of $1,500 per month--or about what it would cost to lease three BMW 325is. Then again, to anyone who lusts after a Gullwing, an entire fleet of BMWs wouldn't satisfy. ====================== An interesting read with some familiar names
you know, that permier finanical services really sounds like a good deal. i mean im not in the market for an exotic....yet. but since my dream car constantly changes when i get older, this looks like a good thing for me.
The F430 example seems too good to be true. First of all, where can you buy one for $200K? Next, lets look at the present value of the cash flow: $10K down payment: PV=$10K Monthly payments: PV=$132K at 5% discount rate (rate I could earn with relatively conservative investments over 5 years) Balloon Payment: PV=$54K (at 5%) TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE AT PRESENT VALUE = $196K Think he'll offer me this deal if I call him?
so you're leasing it, right? that means you pay money to drive this nice car for a while. give it back at the end of the term, and then have nothing to show for it but memories and pictures (and maybe a [new] wife) it sounds like a good business (to own) to me, not a good place to patronize, financially speaking that is
Thats the only thing is paying all that money and then not buying it would just suck I would prefer owning it fully. Although I think the nice thing is you can switch cars regularly or something... I dunno. All I know is at the moment I really adore the 575 maranello in blue with tan which I hope I can one day own somehow or any ferrari but particularly one of these.
I agree with you. It sounds like this guy mention has alot of money to buy the car, why not just buy it? If he doesn't like it, just sell it. Your "hit" is prolly as bad as the lease and give back. I don't think with the high-end exotics, still requires a good amount of money.
Definitely sounds like the business owner is the one that is the winner. My take is that if you can't pay cash for "toys" you don't need them! (flame suit zipped up today). Carol
Matt, re-read - the leases on exotics are more like the classical 'balloon finances' than what we normally think of as 'leases' so at the end, you don't turn it back in, you either pay it off or sell it. Most of these companies don't want your car when you're done, they want you to buy it (and either keep or sell on your own) - it's obviously still cheaper and easier to pay cash, but it's not quite as bad as being forced to turn your Ferrari in after 5 years. Also, in my experience, most of the people who lease are out of the car in 1-3 years even on a 5 year lease, so they trade or sell the original and do a new lease after the old payoff is made.
Ok Rob, I'm no finance guy, but won't the balloon pmt PV be a little higher? By my non-finance guy calculations, your $54k PV for the balloon will only be ~$69k by the end of 5 years at 5%. Either way, call him, get a 430. Sell me your car.
in this situation, it really depends on how long your gonna keep the car. i'd hate to pay the govt sales tax on 200k to only flip the car out a year later. what would you think the actual FMV of the car would be out 60 mths anyhow???
this premier lease looks like it would only be good for those that flip in and out of cars often. why else in the world would you borrow money at 7+%.......
The lease still looks too good to be true because you can't buy a 430 for $200K. Re-running the numbers with a 7.5% interest rate puts the PV at around $203K, which is consistent with the assumptions the CEO laid out - mid 7% interest rate, $200K car. If the car is really worth $230K then the implied interest rate is about 3.75%. (Someone can check my math, I tend to make mistakes when I multi-task while on a conference call.) Additionally, with the lease you have insurance on the residual value in 5 years. As Robin points out, someone buying from the dealer and financing through the leasing company could have done this, but the rest of us won't be able to get this deal.
That's easy...buy cheaper Ferraris and don't service them. But, NEVER lease or finance them! If you can't afford to pay cash, you can't afford a Ferrari. I understand that that seem harsh, but it is true.
In my opinion, only a financially challenged moron would fall for this.......Perhaps "fleece" should be the key word here?
I've heard of people using leases to flip cars and avoid paying most of the sales tax (e.g. in CA). Anyone know how (if) that works? Even if you sold the car after 2 years that's still a lot of $$ you could save on the sales tax (3/5 of 8.25% of 200K... ~$10K). Nick
As a finance guy I continue to get annoyed by this advise. Whether or not you can afford a Ferrari (or anything for that matter) is related to Net Worth, expected income, and liquidity of assets. Finance, lease, or buy is all about interest rate. If you can get an after tax risk free return on your investment that is higher then the interest rate on the lease or loan, you should finance instead of paying cash. Doing anything else would would be financially foolish. If you could buy a Ferrari for a fair market price and get 0% financing, would you still pay cash? Anything below 3% is an absolute no brainer - finance.
I know Rich Sirota. First, he has the money, as far as i know, to buy and own any of these cars. Second, he is in and out of more Ferraris than most people i know- he's also had some great cars. Third, he often buys at sticker and flips the car, so the Barchetta, the Enzo or any of the other cars he's had, briefly, went out the door for more than the cost to him. Leases can make sense in a couple different situations. Take the 740i BMW i got in 2001, new and got rid of in 2004. It cost around 63k dollars for a fully loaded Sport version, they were blowing them out in 2001, since the car was 'obsolete' (and imo, far better than the 745 which suceeded it). No money down, lease payment was like 740/mo for 36 months. At the end of the lease, i did not own a 40,ooo mile sedan that might have been worth 32 grand, tops if I sold it. I also didn't have to write out a check for the 63 grand and change. (Unfortunately, in NY, you prepay the taxes on a lease, whereas in some other states, you can defer that through payments as well). Do the math? Did i lose money?
I've heard both sides of this argument many times now. Yet seeing things like this make me agree with Mr. Sirota and Rob (jakermc). For people who *could* afford it, who could do something better with the money, leasing makes sense.