I visited my family in NZ for the first time in ages and one of my nephews is into this drifting "sport". He's got the Nissan 200sx and it has the coil overs with adjustable platforms (assumed) so he can lower it real low, and the huge rims, and it has had a turbo added, etc. Costing this guy many thousands as he gets the work done in a race/drift shop. So I had a chat and tried to work out the why's, etc. His view on motor racing is that they are just driving around. Now my first reaction was to laugh and say your joking right, but I held that back and kept on listening. He then went on about how drifting is judged and thus it does not matter who is the faster and it is not directly related to how much money you have to spend ... like racing. This last point is a good point. Anyway it makes a lot more sense to me now, because this modern generation is all about image and NOT personal performance, hence why street racing is a slightly bigger thing nowadays (always an excuse in street racing, thus no loss of face). The modern generation do not want to prove themselves, or more to the point get embarrassed on the track by somebody faster ... thus they have removed that element and just play around drifting cause it is fun. The other aspect is that modern cars are about as much fun to drive as having a **** (yep modern Ferraris included), thus his view that racing is just about driving around makes sense. In my day in a 70's car just lapping a race track as fast as you could go took massive judgement, drifting/flicking into corners and knowledge of your cars handling ... ie. skill. Now modern cars are practically on rails and thus boring, thus little or atleast way less skill required. So I think drifting is a reaction of modern cars being no fun to drive, so by purposely upsetting the chassis into a corner they have found some fun. We did not have to do that back when I was young because we were all over the road grinning like an idiot anyway. I really should give him a drive in a classic car ... but ofcourse it will probably be too slow, but I bet he would have more fun, even without drifting. Pete
Sorry man but I can't read all of it due to time constraints. I skimmed it though, and I will comment on the point you/your nephew made about drifting being a response to modern cars "not being fun to drive" which I personally think is BS. Thing is, most people who are into drifting drive old ****box nissans and mazdas. How would they know how a modern Ferrari or other performance car feels like? Porsche,BMW, Lotus etc. You ever been to a drift event? All you see are guys who show up in their 20 year old RX7 or fossil Nissan 240sx or old Supra. This sport attracts people with lower income, compared to higher motorsports. People drift because it's fun. They can take their ancient rwd Corolla or whatever and toss in an LSD and have some oversteery fun. It's not some socio political movement against modern cars or something.
Drifting is something you do in the Spring, on a Sunday, and you are on the beach here in south Florida, and you suddenly find yourself feeling sleepy, and you "drift away". There is no purpose to ripping up rubber in a car and call it drifiting. That is really, well, stupid. :}
So you guys like/enjoy driving modern cars? Heck I fall asleep in 15 minutes as there is no challenge whatsoever. Pete ps: My Nephews car is I think like 5-10 years old, so hardly an old car IMO.
If you're telling me you'd fall asleep driving an F430, 911 GT3, Z06,M5,RS4 etc. especially at the track, then I think you're ****ing crazy.
That's kind of what my first post addressed. He said that the point of drifting was because "modern cars aren't fun to drive", I then asked how they would know that if most of them drive cars that are 10-20 years old. The whole point of drifting is that it's cheap fun. Well let me rephrase that, cheap compared to most other motorsports.
Yes agree, but (okay I'll rephrase) modern cars that most people can afford are not fun to drive. I also believe, but would need seat time to prove , that a modern Ferrari would be boring to drive compared to an vintage one, ie F430 versus 275GTB. IT's not just about how fast it can go. In Australia and New Zealand many of the cars they use (for drifting) are pretty near new if not new. I know of one Holden Monaro that was bought from Holden as a shell and then built up JUST for drifting ... yes sad isn't it. Like I said my nephews car is not what I would call old. Thus I still believe the point of my original post, ie: - Modern cars are more boring than older cars, because the cars are too competent and require way less from the driver. - Drifting is less likely to make you look small because it is a judged event, thus plenty of excuses, opinions to lean on. Motor racing on the other hand you either win or loose. Makes sense of it to me. Pete
Good to see you back on the site Pete.. Btw my 1750 is nearly complete... But i tend to agree with you here. Driving the GTV around a track teaches me alot about Racecraft than a 360 does. How cars react to varying surfaces, and tire temps, ambient temps, Different fuels and additives and alot of other variables that exist that are "absorbed" by more modern cars.. But.. Drifting has been around since the late 60's in Regional Japan, and i really think its only come to light since the invention of the Internet and the media that floats around with these japanese guys drifting like nuts everywhere. Also with Cartoons like Initial D and various other Movies and Books. Drifting really is nothing new over there. But i dont think it was never judged in terms of your drifting ability on those mountain roads. But more of the actual time it took for you to clear the "course". And with how those roads are built, generally the fastest time involved quite alot of drifting. Overall, i really think Drifting is fun and more fun to watch. But gimme proper "Grip" type racing anyday of the week.
Excellent to hear, re GTV ... but I'm jealous, as though mine has progressed its still has no paint. You got it . Did not know that and that makes sense ... might mention this to my nephew to see what he thinks about that. Thus maybe the insecure modern generation added the 'judging' to ensure they didn't look pathetic Pete
Yeah its called "Touge" racing.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Touge Interesting reading uner the Misconceptions area. Might answer a few questions.
Personally I have a strong dislike for any "sport" that is judged. It just always seems way to subjective, the controversies and drama any event that involves judging is for girls or girly men
Drifting like every other activity has its appeal coming across to those who enjoy it in many ways. To sum it up as "Ha! That's the reason "is near sighted and slightly ridiculous. And of course people on this forum will trash drifting as a kids way of not being accountable for being slow on a track or for being childish for sliding cars around. While the same people track cars and show up every few weeks for "meets" and "cruises" which can be viewed as equally childish when using the same logic. Everyone has an opinion but the people on this forum are all right all of the time, so it's no use explaining this to them.
If you think street racing is not about money and being the fastest, you are wrong. They all race to be the fastest ( 1/4 mile or so..) and they all spend all their money on it.
The idea that track racing is clear cut and gives no excuses for the losers is as far removed from the truth as anything else. Race car drivers always have excuses why they don't win and it's rarely their own ability they question. They will always blame the car or the team or the circumstances or other drivers. Just look at Alonso (sorry, couldn't resist).
Hear, hear, racing should be all about precision, which car sets the fastest lap times, which car generates the largest amount of downforce or grip, and which car gets through corners with the least oversteer/understeer while at the same time generating respectable straight line speeds, and by that definition drifting is the most inneficient way to get around a race track that I can think of.
The problem with discussing this here is that, honestly, many people on Ferrarichat are old fogies who are unwilling to accept something new and different from the racing that they grew up with before motors were invented . But really.
There ya go. You see it in business, too: It's about the "process", not the results. The more I see of the modern world, the more respect I have for "primitive" cultures that had the "right of passage" or "novice time": Forcing a kid to go off to face and overcome a challenge (to build self confidence / self reliance) before declaring him an "adult". Today's kids have never had to prove to themselves that they're capable of producing results, so the "process" is about not be blamed for the (lack of) results if you check off all the boxes.
I saw drifting for the first time at the Long Beach GP and really found it entertaining. Wasn't boring as hell like the Cart race !
To nail it down to a singular reason is foolish. To dismiss at something as a result of not wanting to beat is also foolish. The modern take on drifting gets taken from Japan where there are always very real winners and losers in drifting and the Japanese culture is one of extreme conflict, testing, proving and competition in almost all respects. Its born out of that, not out of the feel good 'everybody wins and we don't keep score' culture that your generation is raising.* Drifting is most definitely about competition, producing results and being better than the next person as much as it is about have fun. In the same kind of manner that competitive dancing, ice skating and gymnastics is about being a better performer than the next person. How its rated is less concrete, yet that doesn't stop it from being about being the best. *Yeah, your generation. Kids born in the past 20 years all have you guys as their parents, teachers, instructors, coaches etc... You want to blame someone for the modern bull****, blame yourselves thanks.** ** Yeah for generalizing \o/