IAG - Bad Experience

Just thought I would chime in here as I have first hand experience as a prior customer of Jason and IAG. I bought a car from them roughly 2 years ago and they performed a full engine out service prior to the sale. The car arrived and it was everything they said it was. Unfortunately my mechanic found a leak. I called Jason and without hesitation he wanted to fix it including having the car picked up from me and shipping it back across the country, sorting out the problem, and shipping it back to me. IAG went WAY out of their way to make sure I was happy. You don't see that type of service much these days. My opinion is that it would be a pleasure to do business with them again.

 

I got there as the car was backing out of the trailer so I didn't see them start it. It was running and remained running for some time to warm it up as it was quite cold that day. My memory's not that great (that's why I take so many photos), but I believe the car was shut off and restarted at least once while I was there. The no start issue came up after the buyer took the car home (not far away) - I wasn't there to witness that and I was also not involved in the troubleshooting and repairs that followed.

 

Learnings today in this thread:

Allen is a broker, not even a principal in the deal or owner.

IAG says they had all of the post PPI identified issues completed and provided supporting details.

Allen says they did not but provides no details.

Net for me: would be fine doing business with IAG based on things in this thread.

 

Still wondering: what repair(s) do you maintain were "jimmy-rigged?"

Also, do you believe that IAG should be responsible if the PPI did not discover all issues?

 

Well, at this point I am curious if Allen has ever even seen the car in person.

 

+1.

I would proceed with the same caution as I would any other classic car transaction whether with dealer or private party. IAG seems to have done well by what's presented here - although no first hand experience with them, I wouldn't hesitate.

Ruben

 

Those are O2 sensors?

 

I used a broker in the past and it made complete sense. The broker I used viewed the car in person (multiple times), researched the car's ownership history, consulted the factory, and accessed some really important factory documents that I could never hope to obtain. I couldn't proceed without the broker's help and knowledge plus he transacted the deal. In this case, it sounded like the client found the car and made inquiries to buy it and then a broker got involved and didn't see the car in person, hence my curiosity. Maybe this is a sign that I've bought too many cars on my own.

I don't know the ins and outs of anyone else's business and it's great that you have 900 happy clients but based on how this thread was presented and followed up on, it's a logical question to ask. I'm sure that I'm not the only one who has the same sentiment, even if I was the only one to state it publicly.

 

You posted on 8 separate sale ads, not one. That normally qualifies you for a ban. As a courtesy I consolidated the multiple violations of posting policy into a single thread rather than ban you.

And were you going to repeat that warning to every future reader of every future ad that IAG would ever post again? That would have been very tiresome to the community.

And were you going to refuse to comment further when questioned on umpteen IAG ads as readers wondered what was the actual experience? That would have been misleading.

And were you going to update every future reader on the various different directions that each thread would take so that every reader who you caused to question IAG would get the same picture from all the various different threads? That would have been inconsistent and confusing.

The fact is once you post, we don't require your consent to do whatever we choose to your post. Your approach was spamming. Your approach would lead to confusion. Your approach wouldn't have prevented the same kind of comments you're getting now, but on umpteen threads going all different ways.

Where you posted wouldn't have made any difference to the exchange between you and IAG and the readers wondering what happened, except it would have taken place piecemeal. So get real and own what you post.

 

I bought a TR from IAG two years ago and it was a fine transaction

 

Shortened to save space and time ...

Allen,

Yin initially did you a favor, a BIG favor, by not deleting your posts and giving you a temp ban. Instead he gave you a forum to make your case.

You've managed to cluster **** that into a thread that takes your claim apart, bit by bit, by the very guy you were trying to smack down.

If you can convince some of these unnamed folks who have PM'd you to post here, it might bolster you position. Otherwise, you're out on an island, a lonely island.

D

 

Allen how come the buyer isn't posting here?

 

Thank you for this shining a spotlight on this. I would never, ever, buy a car from Allen F. (Or use him as a broker)

 

The photographs posted by Allen depict a cratered converter core and a semi-melted boot on one of the O2 sensor connectors. There's a good chance that those two are connected, and very easily could be indicative of running (even idling) the car with an ignition miss or a problem that caused a rich condition on at least one bank.

It's a safe assumption that the dealership actually changed the O2 sensors if they billed for it. That's not something that's easy to hide even if they were the types to engage in that sort of thing, and there's certainly no evidence to suggest that they would be.

In that case the damage to the O2 sensor boot took place in the time that IAG had the car before it was transported, or it took place after it left IAG's custody. I don't recall anything being posted which would provide any evidence as to when the boot might have been melted, but we do know that the car has been out of IAG's custody a good bit longer than they had it after the O2 sensors were replaced.

 

or worse, a permanent one. He cut you some major slack, which he didn't have to do. Could have just deleted your posts and banned your rear end.

Instead, you got a chance to make your case and 'warn' us all about the potential hazard, even after violating a cardinal rule, NO SPAMMING.

So, there's your answer. You're still here, right?

D

 

In other words, you wanted to be able to slam a seller but not have to back it up.

You're being naive, that's not how it would have worked. IAG would have responded in their own defense in their ads and the same discussion would be taking place on 8 different ads.