It is not true from what I read. That statistic is 127k people had coronavirus antibodies in their systems when they died. There is a big difference between that and 'died from'. I have also read that there is approximately a 50% testing error. I am unsure why money is being spent 'testing' when flipping a coin would have similarly accurate results.
Didn't seem to be much of a bother to people marching in the streets for hours and hours for 2 weeks. Why would it be any different sitting in the stands for a 4 hour event? Why is freedom of choice OK for one, and not for the other? Don't you believe that every person going to both events know of CV 19 -- and yet still decided to go? I can't see how some can say one outdoor event is justified and another is not. Disease is disease. It doesn't care why people do what they do. So why should one be excused and the other punished?