Is Bernie on crack, he wants to change the Qualifying, again! | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Is Bernie on crack, he wants to change the Qualifying, again!

Discussion in 'F1' started by Jameel, Apr 20, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Koby

    Koby Formula 3

    Dec 14, 2003
    2,307
    The Borough, NJ
    Full Name:
    Jason Kobies
    Whatever they do, just do it all before Sunday, this q2 immediately before the race is the worst idea ever. I agree constant rule changes make a folly out of the show, but in this case it's necessary.
     
  2. Anthony_Ferrari

    Anthony_Ferrari Formula 3

    Nov 3, 2003
    2,365
    Sheffield, UK
    Full Name:
    Anthony Currie
    OK, it does effect the grid position, but nobody knows on Saturday who has pole. The 'real' qualifying is not broadcast live in most countries. The Saturday qualifying is shown, but as it doesn't mean as much less people watch it.

    Hmmm. I'm actually in favour of the fastest car and driver starting at the front. I'd like to see them qualify on sticky tyres and light fuel.
    The more important thing that needs fixing is that the cars need to be able to still grip the road when they get close to the guy in front so we can actually see more real passing on the track. This is why I think they should scrap refuelling, but allow tyre changes.
     
  3. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis
    I think keeping it simple is the ticket. Forget all this two part single lap BS and go back to the way it was.
     
  4. winston

    winston Karting

    Nov 3, 2003
    139
    foothills
    Full Name:
    don
    I agree with BRETM,return to the former one hour format.
    It gives the teams the ability to time their runs so that they may try when there is a lot of rubber or when a fast guy is out and can give a tow. Let the teams finesse their cars after qualifying, add fuel reduce wing. Bring back some mystery to the process.
    Winston
     
  5. bigndude

    bigndude Karting

    Mar 16, 2004
    111
    It should return to how it was a few years ago. I was fun to watch, and everybody seemed to like it except for Schumy haters. Now its just a damn lottery with no real purpose other then to make it look nice for those who know little about F1.
     
  6. sjb509

    sjb509 Guest

    Why not?
    One practice session on Saturday, then the race on Sunday. Cheaper for the competitors (less wear & tear on track). Less travel time for the teams (only Saturday and Sunday on track). Smaller teams will get exposure, at least every other race. Tons of passing. An entirely new strategy required for teams that spans between races from the beginning of the season. It is a wacky idea but would definitely be exciting and probably mean a close championship.
     
  7. Jameel

    Jameel Formula Junior

    Nov 4, 2003
    401
    Canada
    Yah it would be fun to watch the previous winner come through the field, but it would be fake!

    Plus that kind of goes against everything F1 stand for. The best rise to the top and if you can't keep up too bad get out of F1.

    If you do this reverse grid racing, I think it might create complacency in certain teams. The only reason Renault, McLaren, Williams and BAR have come so far is because of Ferrari's domination in the last 5 years.
     
  8. DGS

    DGS Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    May 27, 2003
    72,986
    MidTN
    Full Name:
    DGS
    The problem is that qualifying no longer really means "qualifying". You can run thirty minutes behind the leader and still "qualify". Twenty cars are "qualified" whether they turn a wheel before the race or not. They might as well just be placed on the grid according to the money they give to Bernie.

    The Concorde Agreement must go. Then we can have an hour or two of "qualifying" where thirty or forty cars show up, and twenty start.

    Of course, the "racing" fans would object -- without the (well over 107%) Minardis as rolling road hazards to bunch up the cars trying to lap (again), there wouldn't be as many passing opportunities.

    And it might lead to races consisting of four Ferraris, three McLarens, five Toyotas, and a Renault: There just aren't the wild card builders showing up with radical wings and such that there were in the 50s and 60s.
     

Share This Page