Is it really the tires..or even the cars? | FerrariChat

Is it really the tires..or even the cars?

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by mk e, Jul 4, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,742
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    Just driving down the highway today and I got wondering......

    I've had it in my head that the reason ferrari isn't doing very well this year is that the bridgestone tires just aren't as good as the michelins (USGP aside).

    But driving along today it occurred to me that if Alonso could just walk away from the field, why was Fisichella in the exact same car so slow, not even close? RB was always right behind or even in front of MS, it was clear they had great cars the last few seasons. But I don't see that with Alonso and Fisichella.

    If Kimi could charge through the field, why not JM? He did well befoe the mechanical failure, but he wasn't slicing though the pack and reeling in Alonso.

    What about the other michelin teams? The honda and toyota cars are fast and williams, they just look awful.

    Why did MS, and RB too I guess, turn good qualitying laps and then look totally out classed by Alonso and Kimi who ran the race close to their qualifiing time when MS and RB never came close?

    Why could Sato turn in a handful of hot and very competetive laps before sliding of the track trying a stupid pass?

    The only thing I can think is that maybe the brigdestone tires change completely afer a heat cycle or go off quickly if pushed? Or maybe they just drive and feel completely different than last years tires and the other drives just haven't addapted like Alonso and Kimi have?
     
  2. dretceterini

    dretceterini F1 Veteran

    Apr 28, 2004
    7,289
    Etceterini Land
    Full Name:
    Dr.Stuart Schaller
    With the exception of the backrunners, I think the cars are so close now that it comes down to exactly how the car is set up (wing angle and such), and which driver is having a good or bad day. I do believe the Michelins have a slight edge on the Bridgestones, but that it can be overcome by setup and many other factors. I find F1 a bit more interesting than in the last few year because on the right day, in the right situation, around any of 8 to 10 cars actually have a chance to win.
     
  3. beast

    beast F1 World Champ

    May 31, 2003
    11,479
    Lewisville, TX
    Full Name:
    Rob Guess
    The truth is that the Renalts and McLarens are light years ahead of the competition.

    With the tire rules the driver that is gentle to the tires they will be rewarded with a great result. Alonso, Kimi, Michael all seem to be able to take better care of the tires than some of the other drivers. This why we see a great differential between the same team drivers. Also each driver has there favorite and disliked tracks FA,KR, and MS all have proven in the past that they do quite well at the French GP.

    The fact that MS was nearly a lap down is proof to the fact that Ferrari is way off pace it is not just the tires but the entire package, Aero, Engine, Suspension, and Tires.
     
  4. 2000YELLOW360

    2000YELLOW360 F1 World Champ

    Jun 5, 2001
    19,800
    Full Name:
    Art
    Mark:

    It's obvious that you've never raced before. It's never so black and white. Little insignificant changes can turn a winner into an absolute dog, exchange of information to keep someone from making a mistake is important.

    I'll give you an example: Ben Spies rides for Yoshimura, as does Matt Madlin. The bikes are identical. Spies, being somewhat parnoid, will bet his life that they are not, since he cannot get anywhere near Madlin's times. Spies has a different riding style than Matt, and needs a slightly different set up to get the same sort of times, yet he won't let the mechanics adjust the bike, thinking that he's getting screwed.

    In cars the set up is even more important than on motorcycles. The amount of variables is such that sometimes the fastest guy is the one who is the best at gettting things set up. That's why some engineers make 7 figures a year.

    Art
     
  5. pistole

    pistole Formula Junior

    Jan 31, 2005
    771
    Malaysia
    yes , agree.

    setup and how quickly a driver can adapt to car/track.
     
  6. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    As I have been preaching since I found FerrariChat ... Fisi is useless! Thus first part solved ;)
    Not always but it was a good way of judging whether the car was good (that day), ie. if RB was close to MS then the car was good ... otherwise it was MS performing miracles.
    Good question ... but Kimi is faster! and maybe different strategies and as others have said I bet Kimi is better on tyres than JPM.
    The 2005 Williams is a piece of ****. IMO the aero person (ex-Ferrari I believe) should be sacked yesterday. Williams have not made a good car since Adrian Newey days.
    Atleast he tried to pass ...

    Pete
     
  7. judge4re

    judge4re F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2003
    13,477
    Never home
    Full Name:
    Dr. Dumb Ass
    I think the tires are a big part of it this year. If you read between the lines, Bridgestone did go with a more conservative design to get the tire to last, maybe too conservative. I think the Ferrari is designed for the tire characteristics that they got, so you could make the argument that the "package" isn't fast.

    Don't forget, Ferrari has always been pretty conservative as a team, late to the party with disc brakes, mid engine cars, etc... But when they do figure it out, they do well.
     
  8. beast

    beast F1 World Champ

    May 31, 2003
    11,479
    Lewisville, TX
    Full Name:
    Rob Guess
    From what i understand she left Williams last year after the "Walrus" design. I heard that the revised nose that they had late in the year was not designed by her.

    Another thing of note is the fact that Williams has a new wind tunnel but they have not been able to figure out the calibration of it so they are not getting the same results on the track that they get in the tunnel.
     
  9. imperial83

    imperial83 F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    May 14, 2004
    2,893
    The Ferraris did not really look very stable through the corners compared to the other leading cars. Michael can juggle a car better than most but there is only so much one can do when up against the likes of Raikkonen and Alonso in good cars and Michael did a good job, setting the fourth fastest time of the qualifying session which would become the third position on the grid on Sunday. But the big question was not whether Michael could do it for one lap but rather what he could achieve lap after lap after lap.

    So why is the Ferrari not stable in the corners and turns?
    A combination of the entire package...
    Aero + brakes + tires + driver

    I do not think that Renault have a strong package for Silverstone. McLaren should probably be infront of Renault at Silverstone. Ferrari are probably going to manage another podium.

    As long as there is a mathematical posibility of winning the title, Ferrari will not quit!
     
  10. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,742
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    Funny, I ran a very custom XR harley in the Battle of the Twins series for several years. I was never good enough to win, but almost always top ten. I Auto-cross these days and win about 1/2 or 1/3 of the events I go to. So I have raced.

    Having raced both, I am sure that racing motorcycles is very very different for cars. To your point a great rider will put a second or even 2 a lap on a good rider on the the same equipment.

    I've never seen that with cars, it's usually just a few tenths of a second, like MS to RB.


    You guys are still missing my main point though I think. The qualifying lap times were really close, I expected a great race since they are racing the car/setup they qualified with. Alonso and Kimi went out and raced the whole race very near their qualifying times. Sato and JM put a only a handful of laps together near their qualifying times.

    The rest of the feild, including MS ran the race 2-3 seconds off qualifying pace. Last year that didn't happen, at least not that I recall. MS is out driving the whole rest of the feild on a regular basis just like always....but Alonso and Kimi are destroying him....that didn't come close to happening last season. It's just those 2.

    Last season second place maybe, but certainly third was anyone's guess who would take it. The field was pretty even, there were maybe 6 or 8 cars that had a good shot at a podium finish in P2 or P3 with MS in front by 15 seconds?

    Sunday I watched Alonso and Kimi LAP the whole field except MS who would have fallen had the race run another 5 or 10 laps. They Lapped up to P3! That's not a race. When I first sarted racing, a novice race I was in with about 20 bikes we lapped up to P4....but that was a novice race for god's sake. I can understand that in endurance racing were it only takes 1/2 a second per lap to end up a lap down. But if F1?

    I just don't get it. I just don't see how is could be the equipment because the equipment because Alonso lapped his team mate, who did win a race his year and did well last year and JM (who was always a podium contender last year) and MS seemed to be running pretty close to each other.

    I don't get it.
     
  11. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,742
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I'll add this, I'm thinking the new tires just don't let the car feel like the drives are used to race cars feeling and are comfortable with. In qualifying, when it really matters, the drives push the cars hard, really hard....they need thatr grid position.

    During the race, most of the drivers push until they reach their comfort level, knowing it's a long race they need to finish. The new tires are alot harder than they are used to racing on, maybe the car moves around a lot more than they are used to? Sato turned in some great laps in the race until a poorly planned pass sent him off the track and he backed off.

    I'm wondering if it comes down to Alonso and Kimi just being more comfortable with the way the cars feel on the new tires than the other drivers?
     
  12. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Er, so you haven't watched any F1 for the last 5 or so years ... ? :confused:

    It is unfortunately quite normal for the winning driver/car to lap up to the top 5+ ... in the last few years the Ferraris were lapping everybody else while the spectators (expect Imperial) fell asleep.

    Pete
    ps: What I believe happens is there are certain drivers and teams that once out of a possible win, throttle back and do the reliability run ... to do a RB and gather mere points. Only real racing drivers like Kimi, Alonso and MS push to the end.

    The thing that they aren't seeing is if the had pushed all the way to the end they might have made the car in front break or the driver make a mistake and thus actually get the win ... but they (RB) are just not competitive enough, ie. winners.
     
  13. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,742
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I haven't watched it that much, so I just went and checked the results. You're right that lapping up to P3 does happen, but not very often. The French GP historically seems to be one of the most competetive, with lapping in the P6-P10

    Oh well, I guess it's just me who finds it odd.
     
  14. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    It's unfortunate is how I would describe it ... and highlights how uncompetitive F1 really is.

    I believe we have 3 maybe 4 real racing drivers on the grid, the rest are field (or grid girl) fillers ... ;)

    Pete
     
  15. beast

    beast F1 World Champ

    May 31, 2003
    11,479
    Lewisville, TX
    Full Name:
    Rob Guess
    Heck i think i am going to submit my racing resume to Minardi for next season :D
     
  16. judge4re

    judge4re F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2003
    13,477
    Never home
    Full Name:
    Dr. Dumb Ass
    If you include a copy of a recent bank statement, you may have a better shot...
     
  17. Mr Payne

    Mr Payne F1 Rookie

    Jan 8, 2004
    2,878
    Bakersfield, CA
    Full Name:
    Payne
    JPM dropped out, Fisi had pit trouble. Rubens had brake problems. 6 cars, if optimal could have finished on the lead lap.
     
  18. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,742
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    I didn't catch the problem with Rubens, but I thought I saw fisi lose what, 6 or 8 secondss in the pits? If that was all it was he would have taken P2.

    JPM was just ahead of MS fighting for P3 when he went out wasn't he? Not really in contention.

    Every race (ecept the usgp) has cars with problems, some lose almost 1/2 the field, but it still ends with 5-10 cars on the lead lap.

    It just seems different this year to me. Last year I'd watch MS take pole by 1/2-1 second and go out in the race and put 1/2-1 second on the field. That makes sense to me. But when I see 7 cars that qualified within 1/2 second of each other, and then watch 2 of them put 2 seconds per lap on the field by running laps a second or 2 slower than qualifying times I find it odd. It just doesn't seem to make any sense.
     
  19. Mr Payne

    Mr Payne F1 Rookie

    Jan 8, 2004
    2,878
    Bakersfield, CA
    Full Name:
    Payne
    Renault & McLaren have race pace. Ferrari had this earlier in the year.
     
  20. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,742
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    One of the Renaults, the second car isn't and one Mclaren....you might sell me both McLarens.

    But in qualifying this year BAR/Honda, Toyota and Ferrari are also on pace as are both Renaults and both McLarens.

    I could understand the big change from qualifying times to race in the old days when engines, tires, fuel all changed. But when 13 cars go out and runs a 1:15s or better in qualifying. In the race only 3 cars got into the 1:16s and 12 did 1:17s of better. So about 2.5 seconds off qualifying pace for the race

    Last year in France 12 of the cars qualified with 1:14s or better. Then 5 cars turned a 1:15s in the race and 14 did 1:16s or better. so about 1.5 second off qualifying pace.

    There seems to be a bigger difference between qualifying and race pace then there used to be....with the exception of Alonso and Kimi, they both seem to be doing about what they did last year, about 1.5 seconds. I'd have to past it all into excel to see if it's a real pattern, but it looks real.
     
  21. Mr Payne

    Mr Payne F1 Rookie

    Jan 8, 2004
    2,878
    Bakersfield, CA
    Full Name:
    Payne
    Tires.
     
  22. mk e

    mk e F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    13,742
    The twilight zone
    Full Name:
    Help me get this thing finished! https://gofund.me/39def36c
    Why are 17 or 18 drivers, not 20?
     
  23. Mr Payne

    Mr Payne F1 Rookie

    Jan 8, 2004
    2,878
    Bakersfield, CA
    Full Name:
    Payne
    No idea, that is the only logical reason other than driver skill which could attest to the difference.
     

Share This Page