Exactly - which is why you have to nail the organisations (such as IS, fascists, etc) not the 'citizens'.
Here ya go... another exercise in 'lies, damn lies, and statistics'. How many people noticed the question regarding deporting immigrants used the word 'suspected' not 'convicted - I would have a very different response if the second word was used. Some bizarre results such as 50% agreement with Hanson! No way - the only thing I agree with ON on is no gender quotas for parliament. I suspect that figure was generated because I answered 'same as now' to many questions and I suspect that answer causes the program to 'allocate' a portion of that answer to all the options (KIAI might like to comment on that?). Image Unavailable, Please Login
I certainly would have placed myself further 'north' but equidistant between Lib and Lab is about correct these days (depending on certain issues). So, can I get an answer now from those who showed high scores for One Nation which of their policies you think would benefit Australia?
Yeah, I noticed the wording in that particular question immediately . Anyway, was something else to do in the rain. "Queensland, perfect one day, pissing down the next." At least the water tank is full.
But your results showed 74% agreement with ON? Do you think your results got skewed similarly as my example?
I thought the questions were reasonably 'policy' directed rather than purely philosophical; for instance they didn't ask IF there should be policy regarding wealth distribution but rather whether you wanted more or less than current. In fact all the questions were in this format so definitely policy based.