Keith Martin's 288 Commentary in AutoWeek | FerrariChat

Keith Martin's 288 Commentary in AutoWeek

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by Koby, Feb 3, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Koby

    Koby Formula 3

    Dec 14, 2003
    2,307
    The Borough, NJ
    Full Name:
    Jason Kobies
    I've been a fan a Keith Martin's column in AutoWeek for some time. I was pleased to see that he turns his attention to a recent 288 GTO sale in this week's issue. Unfortunately, he and I do not see eye-to-eye on this one:

    What do you guys think of this review? Martin likes to shoot from the hip but I think he's attempts to be humorous missed the mark this time. His comments about Group B did get me thinking however... I have often wondered how the GTO was equipped to compete in a rally series, but perhaps they knew all along that they would never actually race the car in Group B and maybe just used this as an excuse to honestly revive the GTO name?

    As for his comments about the styling, I guess that's eye-of-the-beholder, but IMO he is way off base. I'm pretty sure universal consensus ranks the 288 as one of the most beautiful of all Ferraris, and especially the modern cars. Also, I hate this notion that Ferrari styling is supposed to be outrageous ... if you look at all their cars in context, the wild designs, while memorable, are aberrations.

    One final point to Mr. Martin is that there is no such thing as a "Modena Spider." :p
     
  2. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,386
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    Well his choice of alternate purchases IS strange, he picks an older model that probably WILL appreciate over time, and a new model whose value is falling like a stone!

    Pink Floyd drummer Mason also discounts the 288GTO as 'derivative' of the 308GTB, but you may as well compare apples to oranges!

    The 288GTO values continue to pace the F40, a pretty strong indicator of desirablility, as far as I'm concerned...........
     
  3. tuttebenne

    tuttebenne F1 Rookie

    Mar 26, 2003
    3,218
    Bay Shore, NY
    Full Name:
    Andy
    If what you say is true, old Nick needs to take another look at his 250 GTO. Its definitely not a brand new design either.

    As far as Keith Martin's comments are concerned, I'd pose a question. Which design, 288GTO or F40 looks better today? Clearly (to me) the F40 is too "over the top" by today's standards (like the Countach is) and will not stand the test of time. The 288 IMO is a timeless design.
     
  4. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,386
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    I NEVER argue with drummers richer than I am!!! LOL!

    But point well made on the 250GTO as well, definately evolutionary......

    Kieth Martin's comments are meant as entertainment I think, otherwise his job title would be "Investment Advisor"......that price is absolutely market correct, if not a 'good buy'..........
     
  5. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,386
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    We see F40s on the street ALL THE TIME here, no kidding.

    There's a Rice University student that drives one. He trumped me while I was on display at the Art Gallery on campus as an Art Car!
     
  6. gtofreak

    gtofreak Karting

    Nov 5, 2004
    201
    Bonaire, N.A.
    288 GTOs are for real insiders only. They are five times as scarce as any F40. A 288 is a wolf in sheep's clothing. Pure understatement, compared to the F40.
     
  7. Koby

    Koby Formula 3

    Dec 14, 2003
    2,307
    The Borough, NJ
    Full Name:
    Jason Kobies
    That collectability comment is bewildering, they only made 273 examples, of course they are collectable! Good point about "Investment Advisor," most of the time I love his stuff, especially when the car is question was not a good by. KM did a 400i a few weeks back and just tore into the poor soul who bought it.
     
  8. Jagbuff

    Jagbuff Formula 3

    Jan 13, 2004
    2,267
    Site of US F1 Race!
    Full Name:
    Franck
    ... his last comment doesn't make much sense - how can you compare the 288GTO to a 360 Spider..for someone covering auctions that's the dumbest comments have read in a long time.
     
  9. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,386
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    288GTOs are bad to the bone. I followed a nice one at the FFQC recently, and he left LOTS of room for me to do my........uh.........parading! LOL!

    I also recall the time spent gazing at one at FoH, comparing detail after detail differences from the contemporary 328GTB......Night and day!
     
  10. thecarreaper

    thecarreaper F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2003
    18,076
    Savannah
    i would sell body parts for a 288. the guy its nuts shunning them. i have said it before i would settle for a Ferrari based non turbo rebody for grins. the looks of the 288 just "do it" for me.
     
  11. ferraripanoz

    ferraripanoz Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 24, 2004
    1,409
    Full Name:
    Mark
    Keith Martin's is usally good, but I don't completely understand that one. I do think that $322,589 for a 288 GTO is a little crazy. I think what he is saying is that for that amount of cash that gets you a car that sort of looks like the 308 is, alittle over aboard.
     
  12. vlamgat

    vlamgat Formula Junior

    Jan 9, 2004
    776
    Keith has it in for the whole Group B scene, the 288, 959, Spoert Quattro, Lancia HD, RS200, he thinks they were so irrelevent to the US Sports Car scene as to be of no consequence to collectors, which is after all his market. His attitude carries over to the collector insurers who generally do not recognize the Group B cars as collectibles refusing to provide coverage at agreed value or referring to the daily driver coverage market.

    Someday the market may understand that these were the last production cars built to an almost unlimited standard in the best muscle car tradition, but it aint now.
     
  13. ryalex

    ryalex Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 6, 2003
    25,999
    Las Vegas, NV
    Full Name:
    Ryan Alexander
    I'll pay $300k+ for a clean 288 when the time comes. Anyday.
     
  14. CMY

    CMY F1 World Champ

    Oct 15, 2004
    10,142
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Chris
    As far as F-cars go, my list is as follows:

    288
    F40
    Enzo
    360 CS
    575 M
    400i
    F50

    Obviously, I'm not a huge fan of one open-topped car on that list. ;) The GTO is the purest definition of putting a car on 'steroids'; it was built in Enzo's day and the fact that it has no racing history does not bother me because it was built for a race series that simply ceased to be.. Porsche was also caught with their pants down and I think history will ultimately be very kind to these cars.

    It's not for everyone, but purchases such as these shouldn't be rationalized.

    -Chris
     
  15. 410SA

    410SA F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    8,511
    West Coast
    Full Name:
    A
    People forget that Keith Martin started out his auto commentary life as an a Alfa buff. It's quite a stretch from there into supercar realms, the stretch made obvious by his clearly uniformed commentary. You really have to take Martin with a huge pinch of salt. He has inveigled his way into places that he doesn't belong, but he's there anyway and we all read the results of his drivel every week in Autoweek. I simply don't ascribe too much weight to his opinions. Markets are simply that - markets, and the price paid for a particular car on a given day is the market for that car that day. I really don't think that Martin's commentary is useful in any way. What is useful is his publication Sports Car MArket, as it simply reports prices fetched at various auctions. That information is real.
     
  16. JOEV

    JOEV F1 Rookie

    Aug 6, 2003
    2,827
    Ontario, Canada
    Full Name:
    Joe
    To me, this sentence,

    "...looks like the garden-variety 308 on to which someone stuck a "Fast and Furious" wheel arch kit."

    tells me that he just doesn't "get it". No need to delve further into his motivations/agenda re. the 288GTO imho.
     
  17. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    More importantly why would you care what he, or anyone other than you, for that matter thinks?
    The NYT art critic said of Renoir: "His ability to paint is a poor as his choice of color."
     
  18. Cavallini

    Cavallini Formula 3

    Nov 2, 2003
    1,835
    He needs to be committed or arrested for indecent exposure of stupidity and aesthetic blindness.



    Forza,


    Cavallini
     
  19. judge4re

    judge4re F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2003
    13,477
    Never home
    Full Name:
    Dr. Dumb Ass
    Ah, jealousy rears its ugly head. Why must people degrade items just because they can't own them? Appreciate things for the time and effort that someone put into them.

    As far as Keith Martin goes, the 400i is a true gentleman's car. Anyone who doesn't understand its purpose will never be one.

    Its your money, spend it on things that make you happy.
     
  20. 410SA

    410SA F1 Veteran

    Nov 2, 2003
    8,511
    West Coast
    Full Name:
    A
    You are exactly right. Keith Martin's publication and his various columns contain two very different types of information.
    Firstly - Reporting of actual prices fetched at various auction, categorized by type of vehicle -VERY USEFUL, especially for someone looking for real world data for insurance appraisals, prospective buyers or sellers etc.
    Secondly - Commentary and opinions of the foregoing - TOTALLY USELESS except for entertainment value.
     
  21. b-mak

    b-mak F1 Veteran

    Most of the so-called journalism coming out of Auto Week is just crap anyway. Do any of their writers actually know how to drive?
     
  22. tbakowsky

    tbakowsky F1 World Champ
    Consultant Professional Ferrari Technician

    Sep 18, 2002
    19,960
    The Cold North
    Full Name:
    Tom
    The 288GTO is the most practical of the Ferarri supercars. In the EVO artical were they tested all 4 of the super Ferrari's..it was the one that got the best marks for it's streetability. The 288GTO in my humble opinion is quite possiably the best supercar Ferrari has ever done.
     
  23. johnhoughtaling

    johnhoughtaling Formula 3

    Nov 6, 2002
    2,113
    New Orleans
    Full Name:
    John William H.
    I found this pretty funny. Kieth Martin just published a book entitled "keith martin on Ferrari" The book is entirely made up of articles, not written by him, but rather mostly written by Micheal Sheehan. The articles are lifted from Martin's magazine in the section dedicated to marque experts. One of those articles Martin published was Sheehan's comments about the 288, which Sheehan marks as one of his favorite Ferraris, reciting virtues far exceeding the F40, and answering questions as to why the market values these cars so highly.

    Comments from experts are important to market, which most people care about because they often affect, or reflect the value of the car. Martin may be commenting on Ferrari's, but I'm not sure he's anything of an expert. Poor and misplaced commments IMHO. His comments that a 360 would be a better choice suggest he is giving an expert opinion, which is clearly wrong. If he'd no authority, his comments are worthless other than to tell you what he likes and doesn't.
     
  24. lashss

    lashss F1 Rookie

    Nov 26, 2003
    2,564
    DC
    Full Name:
    LSJ
    His SCM publication is hilarious! The one liner joke/reviews are so lame that you wonder if he just prints them to laugh at himself. Rarely are the opinions based on any fact. Also, the facts presented on model reviews are often incorrect.

    One of my favorite passages from Aug '04:

    "And finally, 0-150mph in the McLaren takes just 12.8 seconds while the Ferrari is a few tenths back at 13.1"

    "While the F1's mid and high speed acceleration easily beats the Enzo..."

    0.3 seconds to 150 is "easily" faster? Was this an actual road test?? On the same day/driver, etc???

    Luckily, known Ferrari sources (ie. John Apen) submit decent articles from time to time to keep some sense of credibility. I wish we could just get the auction results without all of the other incorrect info and old timer jokes to save me some bookshelf space.

    LS
     
  25. Texas Forever

    Texas Forever Eight Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED Rossa Subscribed

    Apr 28, 2003
    85,600
    Texas!
    Yeah, like a dummy I brought this book thinking, well, thinking that it would have original content. Imagine that!

    Actually, I think that Keith and Steve Jackson have moved on and left us behind. Drum brake muscle cars that go like stink until you have to turn are all the rage. Who cares about them dinky furrin cars.

    Dale
     

Share This Page