Looking for Ferrari owners opinion | FerrariChat

Looking for Ferrari owners opinion

Discussion in 'Ferrari Discussion (not model specific)' started by TudorMiron, Jan 1, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. TudorMiron

    TudorMiron Rookie

    Jan 1, 2007
    40
    #1 TudorMiron, Jan 1, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Most of you have experience with most legendary car in the auto world. So you're the right group of people to ask for impressions.

    It's a project that I'm working on for about 3 years now. Chassis is a semi monocoque with tubular steel front and rear subframes and integrated full FEA spec roll cage. Carbon fiber/Kevlar/ alu honeycomb monocoque similar to safety cell used in LMP racers and formula cars except it’s a two seater. Crushable impact absorbing structures front/sides/rear. Overall chassis layout is very similar to Koenigsegg’s.
    Weight under 800kg. (For those who may be interested: Low weight = higher accelerations – forward, braking, cornering or any combination of those. Also safety – impact energy is directly related to mass (m) in old Newton’s equation. Unfortunately weight has nothing to do with top speed which is not result of torque/weight/traction ratio but power/drag ratio). While this project is a street car it was designed like race car in many ways. Two reasons – I’ve never designed a street car and I love the thinking that is normally behind any proper race car: “This thing has to outbrake, outcorner, outaccelerate and finally outlast the sh$$$t out of competition. This thing has to be strong and safe. Sooner or later it will be smashed into the wall HARD! The guy should simply unfasten his safety harness and walk away”. Also GT2/GT3 racing program was always kept in mind.
    Extensive aerodynamics with underbody tunnels/diffusers. It generates moderate downforce ( ~350lb) in its street spec (no rear wing and front underbody diffuser) and center of pressure is very stable, located slightly rearwards of CG for enhanced high speed stability.
    With suspension two versions where designed– one which is more traditional and another is F1 style inboard suspension. This second layout allows to convert a street car into race car within 20min. All you needed is a jack and two wrenches. By changing push rod on bell crank mounting point motion ratio is changed from 0.8 to 1.1 that will give 2.06 times higher wheel rates, same goes for sway bars – all in all it is about relocating 8 bolts. All that is left - turning down spring perches prescribed amount of turns to lower ride height…. I know that most people will consider it PIA anyway. But this could be a very nice option for those who will like to take it on a race track (Highly recommended as it’s the best place where one can enjoy its true performance).
    Engine is turbocharged Renesis placed well within wheelbase. 406hp at 8600RPM.

    It’s definitely not a daily driver but a car which will look/feel great on the race track and parking lot of night club. It’s intended to compete with UK’s Noble.
    Here’s some pictures…


    Is there anyone who wants to own one for next Christmas?

    Cheers
    Ted
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  2. ^@#&

    ^@#& F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Feb 27, 2005
    12,091
    what does the front of it look like?
     
  3. Evan.Fiorentino

    Evan.Fiorentino F1 Rookie

    Aug 23, 2005
    2,854
    South East Florida
    Full Name:
    Evan
    WOW that is pretty amazing and VERY good looking.
     
  4. TheBigEasy

    TheBigEasy F1 World Champ
    Consultant

    Jun 21, 2005
    18,644
    California
    Full Name:
    Ethan Hunt
    Looks cool. How much?
     
  5. wetpet

    wetpet F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    May 3, 2006
    10,210
    only looks a LITTLE like a 599.
     
  6. toggie

    toggie F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Nov 30, 2003
    19,036
    Virginia
    Full Name:
    Toggie (Ron)
    Nice looking design.

    How large of a car is it?

    Probably the C6 Corvette is a common car to compare sizes with, being a somewhat similarly proportioned car.

    When compared to the size of a C6 Corvette, is it taller, wider, and/or longer?
    Also, how does the wheelbase compare to a C6?

    Those back fenders look much wider than the cabin area. Either it is a wide car or the inside is going to be a tight fit.
     
  7. Simba

    Simba Formula Junior

    Oct 24, 2006
    779
    New York
    It looks interesting, but it would depend on several metrics.

    1) Where's it produced?

    2) How much (ballpark)?

    3) Production terms? (deposit, delivery lag, etc)

    4) Who makes the engine?

    5) If it has a real tranny or not (no flappies, thanks), and if so who makes the gearbox? What's the final drive and proposed gearing like?

    6) Who's building your brakes, and what's the setup like?

    7) Downforce package available?

    8) Turbochargers available? :D

    Edit: Actually, I'll go one farther and specify what would make me interested by answering my own questions:

    Must/Should have:

    - Any structural/frame composite must have the ability to be replaced/inspected.
    - V8/10/12 engine making at least 600bhp. (Don't care how light it is, me wants my ponies. Small V8 w/ turbos would be best.)
    - 6-speed real gearbox, preferably through a known manuf. like Xtrac.
    - No traction control / DSC garbage, or the ability to completely defeat each (Racelogic, etc)
    - Tunable suspension (e.g. Moton, spring weight options)
    - Brembo/StopTech/etal bighugescarysmallplanetsize brakes.

    Would be nice:

    - Active aero. Pop a wing up/out and front canards out/down at speed would be neat.
    - Tunable EFI system (read: Motec)
    - Adjustable seat/pedalbox.
    - Lighting sufficient to land aircraft.
    - Factory "de-hippifying" kit to remove cats/resonators from exhaust.
    - Full electrical/engine/induction system documentation.
     
  8. cavallino33

    cavallino33 Formula Junior

    Jul 10, 2005
    559
    Campbell, CA
    Full Name:
    Jeff
    I like it. It looks really fantatstic. I'd love to have one for christmas... as long as someone is willing to give it to me as a gift since I'm guessing I wouldn't have the funds for it.

    One question though Renesis as in the Mazda rotary (used in the RX-8)? If so 406hp would be quite a large figure for that engine I'd love to hear more technical info.
     
  9. bushwhacker

    bushwhacker In Memoriam

    May 25, 2006
    8,883
    Phoenix Az.
    Full Name:
    Dennis
    Beautiful, where do you plan on positioning it in the market place and at what target price point?
     
  10. Steve R

    Steve R F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Sep 15, 2004
    3,018
    MeSoNeedy, CA
    Full Name:
    TorQ Master
    It's really nice...definitely has some fine features & potential.

    The back of the car looks really nice...wide, powerful, smooth, modern, sleek, etc.....BUT those tail-lights look like you drilled holes, went to a marine supply shop and inserted them: too much like an after-thought. Ya gotta blend them in better, integrate into the design to continue the flow.

    I'd also try to work away from the protruding wheel-wells on the front, too much like the 599 and remind me of my old VW Karmann Ghia. Dial in a bit more DB9 and don't be afriad to smooth/sleek it out a bit.

    A great looking car that is reasonbly well built will always sell :)
     
  11. TheBigEasy

    TheBigEasy F1 World Champ
    Consultant

    Jun 21, 2005
    18,644
    California
    Full Name:
    Ethan Hunt
    You can say that about SO many cars these days, between the viper/vette/599 whatever... but really when you have a front engine coupe, how many ways can you possibly make them look totally different. I mean they are all the same profile probably because the aerodynamics are good, not because they are ripping off each other.
     
  12. TudorMiron

    TudorMiron Rookie

    Jan 1, 2007
    40
    #12 TudorMiron, Jan 10, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  13. TudorMiron

    TudorMiron Rookie

    Jan 1, 2007
    40
    Hmmm.... very strange. Images in the initial post where lost. Now they reapearing again. May be same could happen to replyes that where lost too?

    Cheers
    Ted
     
  14. Napoleondyna

    Napoleondyna Formula Junior

    Jul 13, 2006
    394
    Tucson, AZ
    Full Name:
    Otis Blank
    Let's see the front!
     
  15. kovachian

    kovachian Karting

    Jun 27, 2006
    228
    central Indiana
    Full Name:
    Ron
    So far it looks good. Still need to see the front of course.
     
  16. Jackmb1

    Jackmb1 F1 Rookie

    Dec 27, 2005
    3,329
    Looks nice, do you have pictures of the front? What's the price?
     
  17. jungathart

    jungathart Guest

    Jun 11, 2004
    3,376
    NoVA, AmeriKa
    Full Name:
    Komrade Jung
    Beautiful lines!
     
  18. menoy

    menoy F1 Rookie

    Mar 12, 2005
    2,661
    PL
    Full Name:
    MRodziewicz
    I absolutely love it!! It would be nice to see front image too... the stats sound fantastic - I love lightweights. As to the styling - a bit Marcos TSO/Spyker (rear).
     
  19. TudorMiron

    TudorMiron Rookie

    Jan 1, 2007
    40
    #19 TudorMiron, Jan 12, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    I had a great day. I had a glass of my father’s red wine. Please forgive such a long post but I just wanted to share my thoughts behind this project. Also sorry for my English.

    The front is now under heavy modification as I wasn't happy with it being a bit too errr.... blunt. This will cause considerable expenses but I want to love it. My problem is that I can not and don't want to sell something that I don't love. You, F car owners, most definitely know this already - your cars have soul hidden somewhere inside. There are many great cars around the world but very rarely you find one which is actually alive. Nowadays with ever increasing production numbers it's less obvious but it is still there.
    How ever my all time favorite car is McLaren F1 road car. Reason is that it was designed/built in very unusual way. Basically idea was very simple – let’s build something the way we going to love it, no matter how much it will cost. I’m fortunate to know some of creators in person and they do know their hockey.
    Murena is my dream coming true. Working as tech. director of professional racing team and raced myself several years ago I gained my own vision what it is a car as I see it.
    I wanted something that will handle and be fast around race track like a true winning race car. Also I wanted to be able to drive it to the track without shaking myself to death. I also wanted something that girls will want to throw their undies in… with phone number written. So I started looking around but could not find anything. Well there are some cars and some Ferraris are among them but I was just not wealthy enough to own it. American classics vette and viper are way to heavy – inefficient if you want. Than there’s some lower level cars – like various lotus7 clones – but while they are in some way thrilling they are also slow and simply unsafe. A bit higher level Elise terribly lucks power and downforce. Safety is also not high enough. There’s also Noble M12/M400 – an interesting track oriented car that performs like an exotic (and even better than some in some aspects) but priced relatively affordable. Problem is that it’s a bit too simple… I mean its chassis, its suspension, the way it is built is not something to be proud of – I added a few pictures so you know what I mean. At the end there is very few cars that comply with my vision and no car under about 300 000. So it came down to single option – design and build my own. I’ve never designed a street car but Murena is closer to purpose built race car than a street car. Here’s my thinking behind some of major aspects of current design:



    After working for many years with composite tub cars it’s very hard to be happy with any different solution – steel is way to heavy, aluminum lucks strength.
    Chassis stiffness is vital for proper handling. Chassis strength is vital for driver safety. Weight is vital for overall performance. So there really was no choice – CF monocoque was the way to go. Knowing Paul Martin (designed and built all composite structures of McLaren F1 road car as well as many F1 championship winning chassis) it was easy to choose who will design/build tub and associated tooling.
    Handling. I’m talking about how the car brakes, turns in, around the apex, accelerating out of the corner. How it performs in transitions like in a high speed double S corners for example. It’s all about stability and response. We want as much of each as practically possible. Funny enough we don’t need too much of each either. I’d prefer a car which reacts as fast as I can feel it taking set in the corner. I would want that it reacts progressively slower (slightly) as speed increases. I would also want its responsiveness to be adjustable so the car could be taken further if/when I grow as a driver. I want it to react progressively and predictably on and past the limit. I want it easily controllable at low and extremely high yaw angles.
    At the same time I want stability. I never liked cars that can bite you at any given possibility. Car should inspire confidence in the driver – than he can enjoy it. He will also be faster because he will spend more time close and on the limit.

    To achieve these goals one needs low weight, low CGH and relatively low polar moment of inertia. Stiff and light chassis is the answer. Also size/shape/weight and placement of powertrain/transmission components. One needs suspension geometry to be designed so it will provide stable under/oversteer behavior as designed and set up. It means stable instant centers and all effects provided by castor/KPI/scrub radius/cumber gain etc., etc. should be taken into account. All for one ultimate goal – take care about four little rubber patches which connect the car to the road.
    Still there’s no real speed without downforce. I want the car that generates roughly 0.5G of negative lift. I prefer that major part of downforce is generated by “underbody”. I always loved sport prototypes (Group C) from beginning of 90’s. Those underbody tunnels where generating tons of downforce and also where giving much more longitudinally stable center of pressure comparing to more conventional flat bottom/diffuser configuration. No wonder Ferrari is using tunnels for years.
    Till now I simply described a proper race car. But I want to drive it on and off the track and also show up in the city from time to time. But ultimate performance is directly conflicting with streetability. I think that the only way to be able to enjoy the car in both worlds one need two completely different cars. Ones on the track we need suspension to support the chassis under very high lateral/longitudinal loads at very low ride height. We also need it to maintain stable ride height for consistent downforce distribution and finally support the aero loads at high speeds. While we still want it as compliant as possible to keep tires on the pavement, driving over tarmac irregularities, it is WAY too stiff for the street. So what we normally have is a car that is sort of unpleasant compromise. Too stiff on the public road and still too soft for the track. It is too low for public roads and still too high for the track.
    I think that effective way is to be able to change ride height and most importantly motion ratios. With Murena it’s simple – push secured button to rise the car on built in AP air jacks and relocate 8 bolts connecting push rods to bell cranks and ARB links to latter. Turn down pushrods prescribed amount of turns and you have a different car. It takes to wrenches and 20 minutes at most. Its ride height is reduced from 125 to 60mm (2.56”) and wheel rates are 105% stiffer. With lower ride height underbody tunnels start to really perform. Now it’s stiff and low enough for track and on the way back home it is more comfortable than most track oriented cars.
    Oooph! Now that’s a longest post I’ve ever typed! Time to cut it short.
    I understand that most “normal” people will consider this manipulations as too much hassle. I also understand that most people will consider my car vision as totally useless. But I believe that there are few individuals that share my passion to fast and beautiful cars. Who think that driving a properly designed car on the limit is one of the highest feelings that human being can ever have.
    :)

    Cheers
    Ted
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  20. staylor

    staylor Formula Junior

    Aug 20, 2006
    766
    Sydney/London
    Full Name:
    Scott
    looks great, wouldnt mind one myself :) Ill definitely be keeping an eye on this post as your car grows and takes shape... please keep posting up lots of pics of the build :) thanks!
     
  21. TudorMiron

    TudorMiron Rookie

    Jan 1, 2007
    40
    #21 TudorMiron, Jan 13, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  22. UroTrash

    UroTrash Four Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Jan 20, 2004
    40,477
    Purgatory
    Full Name:
    Clifford Gunboat
    Remarkable.

    So this fellow does this all by himself.

    And they PAY Chris Bangle to bungle designs.

    Ain't fair.
     
  23. DeusGear

    DeusGear Karting

    Aug 1, 2006
    142
    NY
    #23 DeusGear, Jan 14, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  24. Adeotec

    Adeotec Karting

    May 11, 2004
    124
    Philadelphia PA
    I reall like it. Nice job.
     

Share This Page