Low dust brake pads for 1991 TR | FerrariChat

Low dust brake pads for 1991 TR

Discussion in 'Boxers/TR/M' started by Elberoth, Jul 18, 2024.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Elberoth

    Elberoth Karting

    Feb 12, 2022
    131
    Warsaw, Poland
    Full Name:
    Adam
  2. EDoug

    EDoug Formula Junior

    Apr 19, 2005
    266
    Southern Florida
    Adam, Porterfield R4-S is a perfect fit on the Testarossa brake disc, and low dust. EDoug
     
    2dinos and Prova85 like this.
  3. kartboy1234

    kartboy1234 Formula Junior

    Nov 10, 2014
    723
    Palos Verdes, CA
    Full Name:
    Michael L
    I have the porterfields, mine showed up way too thick for the calipers. Luckily I ordered through porterfield and worked nearby so I could take them to be machined thinner. Other than that they have worked well.
     
  4. Elberoth

    Elberoth Karting

    Feb 12, 2022
    131
    Warsaw, Poland
    Full Name:
    Adam
    When did you get those? Is there a chance they will come too thick when I order them now? Was that a design issue that has been corrected or else?
     
  5. Elberoth

    Elberoth Karting

    Feb 12, 2022
    131
    Warsaw, Poland
    Full Name:
    Adam
    Got a reply from Porterfield:

    Likely it was a miss box issue. The front pad does come in two thickness with the AP82 being the thinner option. Without knowing the exact circumstance that is my best estimate.

    https://porterfield-brakes.com/search-result/?years=1991&make=17&model=744&manufacturer=7444

    Thicker version for comparison. DO NOT Order this one - just trying to be thorough in my explanation. https://porterfield-brakes.com/product/ap163/

    Thank you,

    Wendy Charlier
    General Manager

    Porterfield Enterprises Ltd
    1767 Placentia Ave
    Costa Mesa, CA 92627
     
    OldSaul87 likes this.
  6. 2dinos

    2dinos F1 Rookie

    Jan 13, 2007
    3,023
    Brake pad opinion...

    Porterfield makes great pads! I've used the R4 & R4-S almost exclusively after departing from Ferodo "M" & DS-11. Dust is very annoying. Complete agreement on that, but what's wayy worse is poor braking performance. The Porterfield do seem to create less dust while providing good braking. About 5-10 years ago, I picked up on another Porterfield offering and have put them in two of my cars. The R4-1. It's a "Vintage" pad that works well for autocross. I have come to like the confident feel. I don't get on the tracks much nowadays, so the weekend pleasure drive is more of the focus.

    I do not mean to hijack the thread, but has anybody tried Pagid in their F-car? I use them pretty much exclusively in my bmw. These are the most dusty pads imaginable, but they haul down the speed with authority. For the Boxer, the Pagid does not offer the same formulation for the front & rear. Since Ferrari does not use different formulations (with different CoF), I prefer to not start R&D work now, but the modulation and ultimate grip, hot or cold, are impressive, and I'm curious.
     
    turbo-joe likes this.
  7. Auraraptor

    Auraraptor F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Sep 25, 2002
    13,969
    MO
    Full Name:
    Omar
    Pagid pads were OEM for the FHP package 550/575s. Good pad but very noisy without proper bed in and moderately dusty.
     

Share This Page