Massini Report (275 GTB/4 09413) | FerrariChat

Massini Report (275 GTB/4 09413)

Discussion in 'Vintage (thru 365 GTC4)' started by runflat, Oct 6, 2015.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. runflat

    runflat Rookie

    Apr 4, 2007
    6
    Toluca Lake, CA
    Full Name:
    Rick Cole
    Several instances I have seen in recent months where Massini Report contradicts Ferrari Classiche. Classiche states car has correct engine. Massini Report says engine is not correct. Who is right?
     
  2. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,043
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    Rick, there's no way to answer this question without specific examples. About which cars are you inquiring?

    As I'm sure you're aware, some cars have been reunited with their original engines, while others have received newly manufactured, numbers-matching engines via Classiche.
     
  3. runflat

    runflat Rookie

    Apr 4, 2007
    6
    Toluca Lake, CA
    Full Name:
    Rick Cole
    In this particular instance, the alloy four cam we just sold at Monterey, 9413, the Classiche Red Book states the car left the factory with the engine currently in the car. Several potential bidders, who shall remain anonymous, wanted to rely instead on the Massini Report, which states the car did not leave the factory with its current engine.
    A very happy new owner indeed, but a number of known players now scratching their heads wondering if they walked away unnecessarily from one of the greatest road cars to be offered at auction in recent years.
     
  4. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,043
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    Unfortunately, I can't help you one this one. I have it with the same motor (internal #1456/64) since completion on January 5, 1967, yet have not seen Marcel's report on the car.
     
  5. Marcel Massini

    Marcel Massini Two Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary

    Mar 2, 2005
    22,929
    #5 Marcel Massini, Oct 6, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 6, 2015
    Rick

    What axe do you think you have to grind? Or are you just having a bad day today?
    Are you pissed that my report negatively impacted the final selling price?
    My report CLEARLY DOES NOT STATE "the car did not leave the factory with its current engine" (your statement in post #56).
    My report clearly DOES STATE that the engine was replaced by and at the factory (date 17 March 1967). Internal number 1876/64 and thereafter 1456/64. May I suggest to have a close look at the cover page of the factory build sheet, at the engine dyno test page, as well as on top right of the actual engine page. On all three of these factory pages there is a clear annotation/remark by the factory that the engine has been replaced. Naturally the Classiche Red Book says the engine is the one as it left the factory. They do not take into consideration that previously another engine (1876/64) had been installed.

    Former owner Dr. William Vance Shappley was clearly informed by me in 2014 about the engine replacement.

    Marcel Massini
     
  6. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,043
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    I moved this discussion here from the "Who's Who" thread on Marcel Massini.

    I've reviewed the build sheet and Marcel is absolutely correct.

    Of course, a new engine, installed at and by the factory prior to shipment to the U.S., would be approved by Classiche as being original to the car - as it should be. After all, the car left the factory with this second engine (1456/64).
     
  7. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,043
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    Rick, since this particular mystery has been solved, were there any other cars that you would like to discuss? You mentioned "several instances".
     
  8. Marcel Massini

    Marcel Massini Two Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary

    Mar 2, 2005
    22,929
    #8 Marcel Massini, Oct 6, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Hey Rick:
    Below are the factory build sheets for 09413.
    Maybe your Italian girlfriend can translate it for you?

    Cover page, bottom part:
    "CAMBIATO MOTORE IN SEDE DI MODIFICA: 17/3/67 diventa N. 1456/64, per caratteristiche tecniche vedi nuovo foglio di montaggio e rel. prova."

    This translates into:
    "Engine replaced at headquarter and modified: 17 March 1967 it became number 1456/64, for technical characteristics see new build sheet and engine dyno test sheet."

    On the engine assembly page (Foglio Montaggio Motore), top right, one can see that the first internal engine number 1876/64 was crossed out and below that was written 1456/64.

    On the engine dyno test sheet (Relazione Sala Prova) one can see that the first internal engine number 1876/64 was crossed out and below that was written 1456/64.

    And here is what I wrote in my "Massini Report":

    "Chassis type 596.
    Engine type 226, internal #1456/64 (replacement engine, originally with #1876/64, see top right of engine page and note on cover of factory build sheet).
    Gearbox type 592/1223, internal #90/I."

    Marcel Massini
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  9. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    24,092
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    Just curious-- does that mean it was replaced during the testing process, but before delivery?
     
  10. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,043
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    Yes, the car wasn't delivered until May of 1967.
     
  11. westextifosi

    westextifosi Formula Junior
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 20, 2009
    273
    Lubbock, TX
    Full Name:
    Tex Timberlake
    I have been around here long enough to know that if Marcel tells you that a rooster can pull a freight train, you might as well hitch him up and stand back.
     
    Wheels1 likes this.
  12. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    34,100
    Austin TX
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    I gotta remember that one.

    Ever seen one of those old E.F. Hutton commercials?
     
  13. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,218
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    They do blow up..often during dyno testing.
    It reads like this one might have oiled the road.......

    THE Rick Cole???
    :D :D :D

    IMO anyone that lets a limited production Ferrari go by, based upon numero internal, is missing the boat.
    They would drive the same.
     
  14. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,218
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    It's not his money changing hands......
     
  15. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,218
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    Easy there........on any given day, the hammer price IS the market.

    They say.....
     
  16. runflat

    runflat Rookie

    Apr 4, 2007
    6
    Toluca Lake, CA
    Full Name:
    Rick Cole
    I think the main issue most potential buyers had with respect to engine 1876/64 captioned in the Report was the word "replaced", as opposed to the build sheet possibly being "amended" during assembly to reflect in actuality engine 1456/64 being initially installed. Many informed players for such a car came away thinking the car's first engine might have blown up during dyno testing, as has already been suggested in this forum.

    To me, based on the documents graciously provided by Marcel, it appears 1876/64 was simply a typographical error, and in the days of non correctable typewriters nor white out, the correct engine number was simply substituted below the incorrect number.

    This very early 1966 9413 left the factory with engine 1456/64, and a very late 1967
    GTB/4 9925 in the same auction had engine 1632/64. Could 9413 ever have had an engine number as high as 1876?
     
  17. 375+

    375+ F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 28, 2005
    12,048
    When you are talking about a 5 to 8 million dollar car it pays to be cautious. It is my understanding that engines did not receive a Numero Interno until they completed dyno testing.
     
  18. VIZSLA

    VIZSLA Four Time F1 World Champ
    Owner

    Jan 11, 2008
    41,690
    Sarasota
    Full Name:
    David
    I always assumed that the numero interno was literally stamped on an internal part.
    Learned something. Thanks.
     
  19. Terra

    Terra F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 16, 2004
    3,690
    #19 Terra, Oct 6, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 6, 2015
    Based on upon Marcel Massini's explanation (below) which cites a verbatim quote (with accompanying translation) taken directly from detailed content specifically typewritten on 09413's Factory Assembly Sheets, I think the actual meaning of the words directly quoted pretty much put the lie to the theory these dual Numero Internos are somehow a result of some simple attempt to correct/"right" some mere typographical error:





    Cover page, bottom part:
    "CAMBIATO MOTORE IN SEDE DI MODIFICA: 17/3/67 diventa N. 1456/64, per caratteristiche tecniche vedi nuovo foglio di montaggio e rel. prova."

    This translates into:
    "Engine replaced at headquarter and modified: 17 March 1967 it became number 1456/64, for technical characteristics see new build sheet and engine dyno test sheet."
     
  20. donv

    donv Two Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jan 5, 2002
    24,092
    Portland, Oregon
    Full Name:
    Don
    Why would an engine replaced at the factory prior to delivery affect the value?

    What about other parts replaced by the factory during the testing process?
     
  21. Marcel Massini

    Marcel Massini Two Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary

    Mar 2, 2005
    22,929
    Don

    If NOTHING had been mentioned on (no less than three pages!) of the factory build sheets nobody would know today (about the factory engine replacement) and therefore most probably today's value would not be affected. However, this is the market today and because values today are so high (they didn't plan that back in 1967!) it DOES or CAN matter. It is also called due diligence or doing the homework and that's exactly what savvy buyers do now (protecting your investment). Happens not only in the Ferrari classic car world but also in other markets (art!). For most serious buyers it is all important, for others a bit less.
    Other parts? The engine clearly is the heart of it all. So this is key. Everything else is a bit less significant.

    Marcel Massini
     
  22. Terra

    Terra F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 16, 2004
    3,690
    It shouldn't necessarily have a deleterious effect on value of and in itself. However, in the end, rightly or wrongly buyers have their own individual criteria for what matters.
     
  23. Marcel Massini

    Marcel Massini Two Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary

    Mar 2, 2005
    22,929
    #23 Marcel Massini, Oct 6, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Yes, absolutely.
    Just FYI 10545 has internal engine number 1602. See photo. And that car is bullet proof.
    (before anyone asks: The 213 visible above the internal engine block number 1602 is the 275 engine type, and the 100148 below the internal engine block number is the part number for the block. Most 275 GTB/4's had this stamping 213/100148 and in between the actual internal engine block number).

    Early 275 GTB/4s had engine blocks 213/100317 (part number). See build sheets and spare parts catalog for the 275 GTB/4. This was the part number for the late, i.e. torque tube, two-mount two-cam 275 block and then the early four-cam 275 motor. 226/100474 was the part number for later four-cam engine. Part number 213/100148 is what is shown in the 275 GTB/GTS spare parts catalogue and is the part number for a four-mount two-cam 275 block.

    Early 275 GTB/4s = 213/100317.
    275 GTB 2-cam four-mount and 275 GTB/4 = 213/100148.
    Late 275 GTB/4s = 226/100474.

    Marcel Massini
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  24. Marcel Massini

    Marcel Massini Two Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary

    Mar 2, 2005
    22,929
    Again, this is the market today. It is the market that decides.

    Marcel Massini
     
  25. kare

    kare F1 Rookie
    Consultant

    Nov 11, 2003
    3,634
    #25 kare, Oct 6, 2015
    Last edited: Oct 7, 2015
    Disinformation: numero interno was stamped at the foundry so the engines could be followed during manufacturing process. Serial number was added when installed into a car. This also explain interno is always on rough surface. In case of 275-engines one can clearly see that the block was sand blasted after stamping.
     

Share This Page