They said it achieved Mach 3 in a few seconds, and was significantly larger than a MiG-21. If the facts are indeed accurate, then what can be concluded other than it being an alien craft? You really have to wonder...
Anyone remember the F-15's chasing UFO's or something like that? all I know was it happend in the 80's. I have a picture of it on my wall.
Well, assuming we are actually seeing what we're seeing, no optical illusion or anything, what kind of aerodynamic laws are being violated by this thing??? I mean, a cylinder isn't exactly the best lifting body. No control surfaces, that we can see anyway, nothing to stabilize it...it must be one of those top secret antigravitic crafts that we developed.
For some reason, I kept thinking about this thing today... OK, so if the thing is actually what they describe in the little cartoon, I have serious doubts about it actually being able to achieve Mach 3 plus, especially in a matter of seconds. The flat front half depicted would be a serious problem, unless the thing was able to create a vaccum around the "leading edge". I have heard, obviously from sources of dubious credibilty, that there was interest in developing this kind of craft at one point. Some believe the B2 has this capability via a charged leading edge. I don't know about all of that, seems a stretch to me. I read The Hunt For Zero Point a while ago, and it is an interesting read about antigravitic tech. Anyone else read it? Anyhow, I'm well aware that if it is in fact some otherwordly craft (I'm far from being able to consider that a viable explaination) it and it's occupants may posses some capabilities that we are unable to replicate. However, would it not be governed by the same laws of physics as everything within the Earth's atmosphere? Aerodynamics aside, think of the forces associated with accelerating over two mach points in about a second and a half or however long it was. What kind of being could take that sort of rapid acceleration? They'd have to be made of iron...unless, of course, the thing is antigravitic and is able to cancel out G force. I dunno. I'm not positive that this tape is real, or is what is claimed at least. I mean, a few years back, there were "official declassified" tapes of an alien autopsy, and not only did it look fake, it WAS fake. Not that this footage is fake, it just might not be what we think it is. I've noticed History Channel and several others have taken to running UFO shows with some frequency. Must be good for ratings, and, unfortunately, people tend to see the fact that it's on Discovery as proof of validity. I've seen some things I couldn't explain at first, but I'm always able to come up with a perfectly rational explaination. No, not swamp gas Now, the Mexico city tape is a little unsettling, though I have heard that some unusual artifacts were discovered in the tape that suggest it may have been fabricated. Am I thinking about this too much? Sorry, boring day 'round here today! Oh, one more thing, CHUPACABRAS ARE REAL!!!! PS -- OK, so it was 10 seconds...
This one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFKdEy33SO4 I don't know what to make of this one, pilot kicks in the hyper-drive 17 seconds into the clip http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4ywcyqvRmU Air Force Test Pilot augers in?(black project) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n8Yqw4dho8 In every sense they are "unidentified flying objects"
The first one isn't the one I'm thinking of...both of those look pretty fake to me. I have some film savy friends who can do amazing things with camcorders... The last one looks fairly authentic, but who knows what that thing is? A test rocket from white sands or something of that nature? I dunno. But you are definitedly correct, anything flying that you can't identify is a UFO!
