Most unstable ownership in modern F1? | FerrariChat

Most unstable ownership in modern F1?

Discussion in 'F1' started by GrigioGuy, Jan 31, 2009.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. GrigioGuy

    GrigioGuy Splenda Daddy
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Nov 26, 2001
    33,247
    E ' ' '/ F
    Full Name:
    Splenda Daddy
    Was thinking about the Spyker-logo'd hat I have, and got to thinking about that team

    Jordan Grand Prix 05
    Midland F1 Racing 06
    Spyker F1 07
    Force India F1 08

    And rumors elsewhere indicate that it may not be Force India that much longer.

    I cannot think of anything else like this anytime recently. I know back in the day way back when privateers were always in and out. Was there anything similar to this back in the 70s or 80s? That was before my time.
     
  2. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,193
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    Never as bad as this, usually if a team was sold it folded by the new owner, examples

    1) Brahbam
    2) Ligier
    3) Arrows
     
  3. Isobel

    Isobel F1 World Champ

    Jun 30, 2007
    10,630
    On a Wave's Chicane
    Full Name:
    Is, Izzy for Australians
    #3 Isobel, Jan 31, 2009
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2009
    The thread header made me think of one thing; Van Rossem, my nominee for the title.

    Amazingly, the Onyx had tons of potential, was quick and the team actually had decent results right out of the box. The year following was the predictable implosion with Pete Monteverdi holding the bag. I don't believe they made it through the entire season...
     
  4. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,193
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    How about Leyton House, where they had Ivan Capelli driving an Adrian Newey designed car with a Ford Cosworth that gave great results before Newey was recruited to Williams and the whole Japanese House of Leyton House came crashing down. At least it lead to Capelli getting a Ferrari Drive at the worst time possible, 1992.
     
  5. Etcetera

    Etcetera Two Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 7, 2003
    24,134
    Full Name:
    C6H14O5
    Unstable?

    Williams. They will be *lucky* to see 2010.

    Force India? Who cares. No one considered them as being a viable team.

    F1 will should count their stars as lucky if 14 cars line up in 2010.
     
  6. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,671
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    #6 tifosi12, Jan 31, 2009
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2009
    Good question. I lost count, but how about the story of Honda?

    something
    Stewart Racing team
    BAR
    Honda

    Actually I do care. I want them to survive and help spark interest in India because I really want to see a Grand Prix in New Delhi, currently scheduled for 2011.

    I don't think so. If it comes to that, they will allow 3 cars per team and the big boys will eagerly jump on that.
    However the current costs savings already reduce the budgets by a third, so I'm quite optimistic we won't see more bleeding.
     
  7. Isobel

    Isobel F1 World Champ

    Jun 30, 2007
    10,630
    On a Wave's Chicane
    Full Name:
    Is, Izzy for Australians
    I am still so miffed at the SPA outcome, I don't know if I'll follow F1 this season and I'm not even an LH fan.

    Back to the question at hand;

    something = Tyrrell - BAR - Honda
    Stewart - Jaguar - Red Bull

    Toleman - Benetton - Renault

    The ones I tend to get lost on are;

    Lola - Beatrice/FORCE - Larrousse - Venturi - Larrousse --then Scuderia Italia switching from Dallara to Lola

    and

    March - Ram March - Ram - March - Leyton House - March

    Can't complain, at least there was diversity back then.
     
  8. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,671
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    #8 tifosi12, Jan 31, 2009
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2009
    Yes that was a travesty, but then again the just outcome happened eventually. The cream rises to the top, even if Ferrari International Assistance wants to filter it out.

    Keep watching because we need your insights and perspective on here. :)
     
  9. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    +100
    Your wit would be missed Is...;)
     
  10. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,193
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    Right on the money. Excellent post.
     
  11. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,193
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    Korr, you think it will be that bad, I think by 2010 with the savings and the new regulations they should be ok.
     
  12. j15

    j15 F1 Rookie

    Jan 5, 2005
    2,624
    Sydney Australia
    Full Name:
    Jeh
    Unless the regs change again
     
  13. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    Strangely, I would have said that the most unstable was Lord Hesketh and the late James Hunt.
     
  14. SRT Mike

    SRT Mike Two Time F1 World Champ

    Oct 31, 2003
    23,343
    Taxachusetts
    Full Name:
    Raymond Luxury Yacht
    Not to derail the thread too much, but I don't think it's going to be a case of whether the teams save X amount of dollars. F1 is always going to be hugely expensive. There is probably a litmus test for the big manufacturers, which is "are we making or losing money. If we are losing money, how do we justify being in F1".

    If they are losing money, I can see a lot of the big teams bailing out, even with the cost reductions.

    It won't kill F1, because teams that exist to race in F1 (McLaren, Williams, etc) will stick around. Some new blood would come in after MaxBern lowered the entry reqs and Ferrari would stay... but if the economy gets worse from here, I absolutely think Force India, Renault and one of the Red Bull teams will be gone for good.
     
  15. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,671
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    As usual you hit it on the head.

    Regarding Red Bull however: Just yesterday I read an interview with Mateschitz, whose Red Bull empire continues to grow and expand its profits! Despite the global recession. So he is quite happy where he is at now. He does want to sell Toro Rosso particularly once he can no longer use the same chassis anymore, but he seems to be in no hurry.

    So yes, Toro Rosso will be sold eventually, but not as a fire sale.

    With Farce India the numbers aren't that rosy: The entire King Fisher empire is solely sustained and fueled by the beer revenue. Everything else, F1, airlines and what have is making losses. So it remains to be seen how long the owner's patience/passion lasts.

    Renault, well, what can we say? Their current car is a flop and Alonso probably at Ferrari next year. So I can see them stick it out for a while, but I'm not even sure they'll last the entire season. 2010 I expect them to be gone.
     

Share This Page