Mr. Glickenhaus

I'd like to remind ALL (including Steve and His Stevophiles) that just because something is recorded or printed in some form or another doesn't make it (historically) accurate or correct.
Regardless of subject matter, any and all "history" with at least two conflicting views has at least three perspectives, which all can widely differ from each other and most of the time, contestable "recorded history" is just (often biased) opinion of it's recorder.

 

Very hard to contest period photographic evidence of the actual car with details of its chassis that prove chassis DP3 is not chassis 0846 by the very many differences from the front to the back. Pictures are not biased, not the kind you are talking about anyway, and pictures do not have opinion. Then you have the engine in JG's car which is provably a 3 litre 312 F1 engine, not a 4 litre P4 engine as JG claims.

 

The "new relevant material" I was referring to was for 002 and the earlier cars. Although I have not seen the book the art director for it and I held conversations during its creation. They had access to factory files and photos that had not been published previously. Does it provide definitive answers in some areas that had had unresolved questions? Again, not having actually read the book I can't say.

If you are trying to use this new book as a way to try claiming that JG's "0846" could still be the real thing, then come to a screeching halt. Go past all of Steve's evidence and dissertations, it is known who built the chassis. Just because you don't know that tidbit doesn't mean the information is not out there.

A tragedy in all of this saga is that JG has some extremely wonderful cars. Ferraris with no question marks on their provenance. Ferraris that should be celebrated for what they are and represent. JG certainly appears to have a genuine fondness for these cars and ensuring that they are properly taken care of. I certainly enjoyed how he put the Dino in the Pf wind tunnel and what was discovered. But, like Nixon and Watergate, one just can't forget a significant part of the picture.

 

gee thanks for the reminder of the obvious. Which by the way is why it is important to combat the media machine that is JG on 0846. There is no equal platform to say it without sound slanderous.

So please share that with all of the JG sicophants.

 

And .....
I'd like to remind ALL (including Jim and His Jimophiles) that just because something is recorded or printed in some form or another doesn't make it (historically) accurate or correct.

 

I know you didn't mean it as one, quite the opposite actually and said to diminish what I actually did, but I'll take the above as a compliment to the research/hard work I did in finding the truth about DP3/"0846".

 

So I am a hateful troll for doing the research and posting the actual evidence and facts of the matter that prove DP3 is not 0846. Quite frankly that's laughable as a certain person might say.

 

What did the fact that I was looking for a job have to do with the facts of the matter? Did that change the facts of the matter? Now let us see you challenge the evidence? You won't because you can not challenge it.

 

Only according to a troll. You are attempting to tarnish the truth I have researched and posted as trolling as you and some of your moderators have unjustly done in the past.

 

No, you're a hateful troll for incessantly posting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting and reposting..... the evidence you found and presented years ago, at every opportunity presented by the mere mention of JG's name, or anything that can be associated with him. ANYTHING.

We get it.

 

Absolutely ridiculous. And no you don't get it as you say ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about Glickenhaus posting and reposting all over the net and in the press to this day that he owns the real Ferrari 0846. Rather than comment on that you attack me which is very sad. The information that I have posted regarding Modulo is correct as well and verified by the actual designers of the car in writing. You are typical of the many who post and attack with no real
knowledge of the facts.

Glickenhaus has been continually posting and broadcasting this nonsense for at least 16 years. I only got involved around 2014 and I am made out to be the evil bad boy for posting the truth.

 

LMAO - Even in your "No I don't!" response, there it is.

 

It is not appropriate to use this site to try and balance the traffic Glickenhaus is able to generate on the remainder of the internet. If you can't face off with him where he is, then that's too bad for you. You may consider his advantages in this regard "unfair", but your attempts to perpetuate this battle with Glickenhaus here, when he is no longer even posting here, has worn thin with most people.

 

But it is okay for people to post about his new cars with the intensity of a sponsor whilst he is not posting here.

 

Yes, people are reasonably entitled to talk about new cars. This is a car site. If it were overdone, that's a different story. But a thread or two is not overdone.

If you have something new to talk about fine, but if you post to rehash old battles, that's a different story. Note that you were only banned for 30 days from the Ferrari Modulo thread. That was to allow you to pursue the point you had raised again once your ban expires, as it is a new topic. However, I would not use that as a platform to bring up 0846 again in that thread.

 

What's funny is the person who started this thread hasn't said boo, as far as I know, this whole time. Wonder why?

 

This must be the only thing that gives Steve's life meaning. Its his windmill in a sense. Honestly, every time I see this never-ending crusade of his, it only makes me feel sad and embarrassed for him.

To be clear, I say this presuming he is right in his finding on the car in question. However, its his inability to have any clue about how he comes off, his inability to know when the argument is won and give it a rest, that make it sad and embarrassing. I realize he doesn't (can't?) see any of that and thus won't see/realize that his behavior is both sad and embarrassing. And - thus - the crusade goes on...he is a poster child for how to take a "win" and make it a "loss". Steve, try some introspection on this! (folks here - who are on your side in the car argument - have suggested this to you in this very thread...think about that)

 

Has anything in this thread answered your question, and do you still miss him?

 

Another ridiculous post. That I contributed to the 0846 thread does not disqualify me from making valid points about claims made regarding Modulo. I was perfectly entitled to make comments, especially ones that I can back up. My comments regarding 0846, apart from one to John Houghtaling in another thread, have been mainly due to personal attacking ones like this one from you and your other pathetic post attacking me earlier in this thread. That you claim my argument is now lost because of my comments in response to rubbish from people like you is again ridiculous. So DP3 must now be 0846 must it? I am ROTFL.

 

I know this kind of stuff drives post counts, which is good for FerrariChat marketing, but I question the wisdom of keeping this thread open in the general area. There are already threads were this stuff can be hashed and rehased forever. But leaving this one open is what the lawyers call motorcycles -- an attractive nuisance.

 

LOL. Your point about the car doesn't become a loss, no..that's not what becomes a loser...(I realize you can't/won't understand this, but I was actually trying to help you)

Ya think? (this thread should have been merged long ago, or least the posts/content related to the dead horse moved to that thread and/or posters asked to move their comments there)

 

This thread should be merged with the 0846 MegaThread, as I did with so many threads many years ago.

"The pheasants are beneath me." - SoCal to az
"I have very few pet peeves in life . . . " - PeterS
"Change is inedible" - fc2

 

I don't need help like yours thanks.

 

okie dokie. Carry on.