Quote Autobild: "In the consulting contract between Ecclestone and BayernLB, signed by Gribkowsky, Ecclestone is assured certain rights for the sale of the [F1] shares. Especially one point is a sign for sheanigans between [Ecclestone and Gribkowsky]. Lawyers with F1 affinity rate the document as highly risky because 'no bank in the world would get into such a deal, and because this contract would additionally be at the expense of someone else, namely the future buyer'". That's the last thing that will happen! All they want to do is unload the responsibility for the BayernLB disaster(s) (there were a lot of scandals over the last years) on someone who is not a party member. A famous scapegoat like Ecclestone, perfect. (That being said, I don't doubt for a minute that he bribed the hell out of Gribkowsky!)
Hmm.... Obviously, I have no idea about German law, but that (certain rights in any sale) seems perfectly normal to me..... The seller(s) ensure, eg, existing directors get paid, maintain their positions, and/or shares etc in the new outfit and so on. Again, very interesting. If Gribkowksy was, as it seems, an officer of the bank he may just have done exactly that! OK! Gotcha! Damn politicos trying to cover their asses in the usual fashion..... Cheers, Ian
It would be quite unusual to hire a consultant and then grant loads of rights to that consultant, at the expense of the future buyer, no? Especially when it's a nine to ten figure deal... Edit: "the sale of the shares" in the Autobild quote refers to BayernLB as the seller, Ecclestone only shows up as a consultant here!
I'm not sure - Maybe one for the gurus up in the business forum, but my immediate reaction is 'no'.... These consulting companies (or individuals if you're good! ) are *masters* of getting 'money' (shares, positions, pensions, golden parachutes etc) for their clients and themselves. And often the buyer (happily) pays, one way or another...... Cheers, Ian
Exercise. It's running great but we're closing on the new house today and will have our hands full for a bit moving in.
Gribkowsky and some of his colleagues are in front of a court again from today on. This time, it is about the Austrian bank Hypo Group Alpe Adria. When BayernLB failed to buy the Bawag bank years ago, the Bavarian finance minister announced in the public that the management is too stupid to buy another bank. To make up for that insult, they tried to buy the HGAA - in the end, they overpaid by about 500 million (apparently because the Austrians manipulated the books) and had to bribe the notorious Austrian politician Jörg Haider by sponsoring his favorite football club with 240 million. HGAA then crashed spectacularly, and BayernLB sold it back to Austria for 1. Again the Bavarian government wants to see blood and sues a) the management and b) various Austrian entities.
Only shows how Bernie was black mailed even more. This bank and officers are on record paying bribes themselves and Bernie is the issue LOL??! BayernLB needs help to say the least lol!
That was a different, but related case - a media company sued Bernie. In respect to the BayernLB case, which was not part of that trial, the UK judge said... So one judge - in a different country and in an unrelated case - already thinks that Bernie is guilty of bribing Gribkowsky. If there are effects on the Munich trial, they won't be positive.
The judge who will be presiding over Bernie's case in Munich also presided over the Gribkowsky trial and he stated then that although he had found Gribkowsky guilty, he was sure that the real villain of the piece was Bernie, so Bernie stands no chance of getting a fair trial because the judge has made his mind up already! Judge Newey's assessment of Bernie's character and what he felt really occurred between Bernie and Gribkowsky will now convince the German Judge that his opinion is already correct and so Bernie stands even less of a chance of receiving a fair trial. Frankly, based on the German Judges statements about Bernie so far, I think his trial in Germany is going to be a modern version of dropping suspected witches into a river and decided that if they drown then they are innocent, but if they float then they are guilty of being a witch and must be burnt at the stake!
Seems the prosecutors have agreed to make the trial 'part time' so as to allow him to continue running F1; I certainly don't know the German legal system, but that seems very unusual to me. (Florian?) Cheers, Ian Ecclestone reveals bribery trial will be 'part-time' to fit F1 calendar - Pitpass.com
My lawyer friend from the heart of Bavaria says hello. Schedule agreements are not unusual if the defendant is for example self employed and it suits the general planning of the court.