One more for the acro inclined... | FerrariChat

One more for the acro inclined...

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by Chupacabra, Dec 19, 2009.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Chupacabra

    Chupacabra F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2005
    3,531
    Behind a drum kit
    Full Name:
    Mr. Chupacabra
    I've been working on perfecting my hammerheads lately. Unfortunately, my training plane is not suited for any less than 1/2 G, but it's my understanding that if you modify the hammerhead a bit, you will never quite get to 0 or negative. What I've been doing is initiating the pullup at around 120 MPH, then smoothly going full rudder with a little opposite aileron as soon as the wings are at the vertical instead of waiting for a particular airspeed (60-55 recommended for negative capable Citabrias). Somehow, I'm still ending up with an indicated -2 G. I've never had an engine problem, but it's still bugging me that I just can't seem to do it without getting under 1/2.

    Any suggestions? More speed, maybe 140, before initiating the pullup?
     
  2. Roger103

    Roger103 Karting

    Sep 13, 2009
    112
    Full Name:
    Trim Tab
    I can't help you with keeping your maneuver in the G force range that you would like. But I would like to ask what kind of aircraft are you using? Most FAA aerobatic aircraft are good up to -3 gs. Even a normal category aircraft can take -1.52gs.
     
  3. Roger103

    Roger103 Karting

    Sep 13, 2009
    112
    Full Name:
    Trim Tab
    Or and you wanting to keep the g force less due to your engine (non inverted oil system)
     
  4. Chupacabra

    Chupacabra F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2005
    3,531
    Behind a drum kit
    Full Name:
    Mr. Chupacabra
    Yes, exactly. This particular 7KCAB doesn't have an inverted system, so I'm (obviously) limited to how much time I can spend upside down and in negative G. It had a prop strike (not my doing!) about a year ago and was supposed to come back with an inverted system after the rebuild, but that never materialized :(
     
  5. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    All that I remember in doing hammerheads is to feed in enough aileron just before rudder to keep the advancing wing from rolling you to a negative position. I never was taught the method of reading G in all of that but I'm not saying that it wasn't correct. It was just done by feel, I guess, but when you get it right it is a fun maneuver. I personally don't think that high entry speed is as important as coordination at the apex. You are flying an airplane that hangs on to speed a lot longer than an old biplane so you are afforded the luxury of time to blend the input of the controls to do a nicer maneuver,I believe. You are doing good stuff.
    Switches
     
  6. Chupacabra

    Chupacabra F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2005
    3,531
    Behind a drum kit
    Full Name:
    Mr. Chupacabra
    Thanks, Bob; good to hear you think I'm going in a worthwhile direction! It sure is a lot of fun! I guess I'll try cranking a little more aileron in next time...I've been using what I thought was sufficient, but I'll see what happens with close to full deflection, maybe that will take care of it.
     
  7. Tim Wells

    Tim Wells Formula Junior

    Dec 31, 2009
    393
    Dallas, GA
    Full Name:
    Tim Wells
    What kind of plane is it? In a Stearman I always point it downhill to about 140 and pull up for any rolls, loops or whatever but it has a heavier engine (300HP Lycoming with a 2B20 prop).
     
  8. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    Ah yes! You are flying the best combination for a Stearman, I think. It adds enough HP but not the extra weight of a 450 or 650. I flew one with the entire front end off of an AT-10, cowling , engine, and prop and it was an absolute delight. I don't think that there is an airplane anywhere that can equal the flyabilty and strength of a Stearman. They just seemed to me to be a perfect airplane for training someone to do whatever they wanted to try without any danger. They were 13 G up and down and always displayed a sense of wanting to fly as much as you did AND forgave any clumsiness in your efforts to learn maneuvers. How I loved my days in that airplane! My son and I had a wonderful day in a 450 Stearman some time ago buzzing the shores of the Columbia River, shooting through the gaps in stands of poplar lining the meadows along the bars and scooting over a barge loaded with fir chips that we could smell when we went over. Then we did a wing over at Beacon Rock and headed back down the river and flew low over a nudist beach where some scrambled for their tents and others came out and waved at us as we went by at 100 feet. What a great day!
    Switches
     
  9. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,017
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    The name of that beach is Rooster Rock that isn't a rock at all but a big sand bar. Funny people.
    Switches
     
  10. Chupacabra

    Chupacabra F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2005
    3,531
    Behind a drum kit
    Full Name:
    Mr. Chupacabra
    I'm in a 160 Horse injected Citabria. 140 is standard entry for loops etc. According to the placard, 140 is the target airspeed for hammerheads, too. For whatever reason, when I went up with an instructor to do some tightening up, I went for the dive and he said, "Just go right into it at 120 MPH." So, I tried it, but it feels much better with more speed. It's easier to maintain a straight upline and it seems to keep the Gs from going too far negative.

    I REALLY wish I had access to a Stearman. That looks like a seriously fun aircraft.
     

Share This Page