OnStar vs Lojack | FerrariChat

OnStar vs Lojack

Discussion in 'Other Off Topic Forum' started by Adrenln328, Jan 27, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Adrenln328

    Adrenln328 Formula Junior

    Sep 1, 2003
    346
    Kingston, Wa, USA
    Full Name:
    Byron
    Does anyone have advice regarding these 2 options?
    I just got a new Corvette that has OnStar (which I've never had before) and I'm wondering if it does all that Lojack does as far as vehicle tracking & recovery.
    Is there any point in getting Lojack, too?
    Thanks
     
  2. jungathart

    jungathart Guest

    Jun 11, 2004
    3,376
    NoVA, AmeriKa
    Full Name:
    Komrade Jung
    I personally subscribe to the firm of Smith and Wesson for all my security needs.:D
    However, between OnStar and Lojack I would go with the former.
     
  3. senna21

    senna21 F1 Rookie

    Jul 2, 2004
    3,334
    Los Angeles, CA
    Full Name:
    Charles W
    Take a look at the literature and Check with your insurance company.

    I have a LoJack on my car, the insurance company wouldn't give me a discount for it. But if I had a factory installed alarm they'd give me one. :(

    So the insurance company thinks that preventing the theft is much, much more important than getting the car back. How much prevention the alarm provides these days is a bit beyond me. I hear them going off all the time an no one gives a second look.
     

Share This Page