Paintwork for supercars - Opinions needed | FerrariChat

Paintwork for supercars - Opinions needed

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by MR_biased, Jan 14, 2010.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. MR_biased

    MR_biased Rookie

    Feb 12, 2008
    31
    S. California
    #1 MR_biased, Jan 14, 2010
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2010
    I believe that when damage occurs to the 360 or F430, the repair can be done at an authorized shop or at least a very reputable shop and I wouldn't think twice as long as the results were good. When reselling the car, having been repainted may be an issue but I don't believe it to be a major impendence to the purchaser's decision (ie who painted it and were they qualified to do so rather than what happened) if the job is good.

    In repainting a Ferrari supercar, say F40/F50/Enzo, is it a great concern of collectors and buyers that a bodyshop certified/authorized by Ferrari does the work or one that simply has the expertise but may not be certified is adequate provided both do the same quality of work?
    Are there certain bodyshops (specifically in the S. California area) that garners so much respect that their job automatically gives the discerning buyer comfort?
    What matters to you most? Choosing the finish or the shop that does the work?
     
  2. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    #2 Bill S, Jan 14, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Personally, in Southern CA I would only trust David Freed at Premier Motorsport for any Ferrari paint work. If new panels are used to replace damaged panels, modern Ferrari's (e.g., 360, 430, CS, etc) should not suffer any loss in value. The paint can be matched perfectly to the factory finish (color, texture, etc).

    Older Ferraris and the super Ferraris have less-then-perfect paint. So these need to be painted less than perfect, which is really hard! For example, the paint on an F40 is thin in some places, thick in others, and has drips, runs and cracks. Some people prefer a re-painted F40 that is perfect and will pay more for that. Others prefer the original paint. I must admit that a re-painted F40 looks beautiful, but, for me, it does lose some of the charm.

    Here are some pictures from a 700-mile 1990 F40 that has never been painted outside the factory. The paint is really bad!
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  3. Tipo815

    Tipo815 F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    3,565
    Newport Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Jeffrey
    I agree with Bill on all levels including his recommendation of Dave at Premier. Part of the mystique of the older cars is that they were all hand built (including being hand spray painted). There are even inconsistencies in terms of the actual areas that were painted on the older cars. Joe Sackey can chime in here but there are some F40s with black paint inside the rear quarters behind the wheels and others with no black paint. Why? No idea. Some people joke that Luigi painted that one and Mario painted the other one! :D

    As far as repainting any Ferrari and how it affects value is based on any number of factors. Respraying a front bumper from stone chips is probably acceptable to most buyers. Repainting an entire car due to being sandblasted in the desert would likely make most buyers run the other direction UNLESS Dave at Premier happened to do the respray. That's only my opinion of course. Dave's respray of a modern Ferrari is probably better than the original paint from the factory! If there was no actual damage to the car and it was simply being resprayed for stone chips, oxodized paint beyond repair, etc. - a respray by Dave would add value in my opinion.

    Just different circumstances and situations - all of which will may affect a car's resale value.
     
  4. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    +1

    Original paint really does vary from car-to-car and if you see enough of them in original guise you start to realize the degree of variation. I have observed that there seems to be variation consistent with certain batches of cars, and you notice this if you track chassis numbers.

    If you do section repaints (front spoiler etc), you want to try and make sure it is not too nice since the original paint on the rest of the car will make the repaired area stand out. I recall Jeffrey on one of your other cars where you were able to facilitate a normal repair in an area that even replicated the 'sucked-in' finish to still show the composite material weave. Now thats impressive, and that sort of 'sympathetic' repair really enhances the car's uniform appearance and its value IMO.

    As for repainting, I cant for the life of me imagine why someone would want strip perfectly good paint and do it over, but I do respect that it does happen and that some in fact prefer a nicer finish than the crude finish of the Supercars. Is a repainted one less or more valuable? Depends who's buying!
     
  5. menoy

    menoy F1 Rookie

    Mar 12, 2005
    2,661
    PL
    Full Name:
    MRodziewicz
    Not really adding to the subject, but.... WOW.
     
  6. Tipo815

    Tipo815 F1 Rookie

    Nov 1, 2003
    3,565
    Newport Beach, CA
    Full Name:
    Jeffrey
    Hand painted by Luigi on a Friday afternoon 30 minutes before closing time! :D
     
  7. RufMD

    RufMD F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Jan 31, 2004
    3,246
    USA
    Full Name:
    Jas
    with a cigarette dangling from his lips....
     
  8. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    I think the rough finish of the GTO & F40 in particular is not only part of the car's charm, but it also means that you worry less about using them and gathering a few flaws!
     
  9. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    While some of that is "handbuilt charm" much of that looks like use or abuse. 700 miles or not some of those scratches look to have happened after the fact IMO.
     
  10. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    #10 SSNISTR, Jan 14, 2010
    Last edited: Jan 14, 2010
    On a side note. I saw one F40 LM in person a few years ago. The craftsmanship on those is amazing. Michelloto does some amazing work....
     
  11. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    Scratches yes...maybe. It has been sitting in storage for 20 years!
     
  12. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    #12 Bill S, Jan 14, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  13. mv75

    mv75 Rookie

    Jan 6, 2009
    42
    France
    Full Name:
    Marc
    If you can consider to ship your car back to its original continent, then you can go to Zanasi.

    http://www.zanasiferrari.it/ita/home/home.aspx

    Here in Europe, they are pointed to as real magicians for any F paint, and more particularly for paint on carbon fiber models (ie supercars). I think their website give a good hint at what they are capable to do. Would just add that they work very closely with the factory and do the paint for current Ferrari F1 models.
     
  14. DennisForza

    DennisForza Formula 3

    May 23, 2006
    1,814
    Arlington, VA
    Full Name:
    Dennis
    The factory of the late 80's/early 90's was far different from today's.
     
  15. MR_biased

    MR_biased Rookie

    Feb 12, 2008
    31
    S. California
    #15 MR_biased, Jan 15, 2010
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2010
    Bill S - thanks for the input and pics as well!

    Thanks for all the input guys. I agree with the consensus that the earlier factory paint work on carbon fiber panels were not the greatest, fact is the earlier paint work weren't that consistent either so you'd get some panels that didn't altogether match. I'm more in the school of replicating the paint to show the composite material weave to match the remainder of the factory finish rather than having a thickly, highly glossy F50 for example. Up close, it rings alarm bells when I can't see the grid effect of the carbon fiber weave underneath but this may not be true to other buyers or owners.
     
  16. Bill S

    Bill S Formula 3

    Oct 2, 2004
    1,995
    #16 Bill S, Jan 15, 2010
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    You're very welcome! Remember, though, that some panels may show the weave and others not, depending on how heavy the paint was applied that day. I saw two original F40s, one with the weave showing on the front hood and roof, the other with it hardly visible in the same areas.

    Here's a photo showing how the door is smooth on this original F40, but the front quarter shows the weave. I think the doors were painted on a different line.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  17. SSNISTR

    SSNISTR F1 Veteran

    Feb 13, 2004
    8,046
    SFL
    If you ask me seeing the weave of the carbon kevlar composite on a F40 is cool as can be. Same goes for the F50....
     
  18. rossocorsa13

    rossocorsa13 F1 Rookie

    Jun 10, 2006
    2,557
    Nashville, Tennessee
    Full Name:
    M
    That carbon Enzo is incredible. Amazing color combo.


    Bill, those in-action paint pictures for the F40 are something else... Amazing how far the standards have come. Even more interesting is the value preference such an original-style job holds...
     
  19. DM1

    DM1 Formula 3
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Nov 9, 2006
    1,043
    Southwest
    Full Name:
    DM
    Even though all F40 had a less than perfect factory paint job, I was told that by 92 the factory painters that finished these cars became a little more skilled in their craft. Don't know if its true or not, but thats why some say a 92 should bring in a premium.
     

Share This Page