Pic of most advanced, declassified plane ever | Page 3 | FerrariChat

Pic of most advanced, declassified plane ever

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by TimN88, Aug 3, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Artherd

    Artherd F1 Veteran

    Jun 19, 2002
    6,588
    Bay Area, CA
    Full Name:
    Ben Cannon
    NOBODY has 'stealth deceting' systems yet, nor will they! Our own gov't dosen't have 'em, for the same reason they don't have kryptonite.



    PPS: as for the goose, that's why the *actual* radar cross sections are classified. Also, good luck picking up a goose that far out at all.


    Art: the F117 was shot down during the brief time that it IS visible, when it's bomb bay doors were OPEN. They were opperationally STUPID and flew the same flight paths day after day, so the missile was already in the air in 'seek' mode.

    This was an error of human stratigists, not of any of the equipment.
     
  2. Artherd

    Artherd F1 Veteran

    Jun 19, 2002
    6,588
    Bay Area, CA
    Full Name:
    Ben Cannon
    See above. When an F117 lands we send out guards so that no one literally HOPS IN AND STEALS IT. If they go black (transponder off, etc.) then WE can't find it either.


    It may not last forever, but just think (or better, calculate) the power/sensativity needed to reliably pick up and track a 600KIAS bee at 50kilometers?
     
  3. gabriel

    gabriel Formula 3

    The show must have been about the JSF. It takes off vertically, the f-22 doesnt.
    -----------------

    There are actually three variants, or models, of the JSF planned for production.

    Only one is VTO, designed to replace the Marine corp's aging Harrier.

    I have my doubts that the JSF will ever be produced
     
  4. gabriel

    gabriel Formula 3

    p.s-the US has always had a history of underestimating foreign military....
    let's not even go into vietnam or iraq or afghanistan,
    but look what the americans said about the mig-15,mig-29,etc....[/QUOTE]
    -----------------------
    What a crock of s**t.

    The US military has a history of kicking azz, and that's why you aren't speaking German or Russian. Or are you?.
     
  5. stolen

    stolen Karting

    Dec 25, 2004
    68
    lakeville, mn
    Full Name:
    adam
    i'm as much pro-USA as anyone, but what is your definition of "kicking azz?" here in the US we do a great job of celebrating our victories and an even greater job of not learning from our mistakes.
     
  6. TimN88

    TimN88 F1 Veteran

    Jun 12, 2001
    5,054
    Northeast
    Full Name:
    Tim
    I think they will make it. Since it will be made for 3 branches (4 if you include the royal nav), it will be made in higher numbers. It will cost less and be cheaper to maintain. This is important because the price of jets has been going up with each successive model. How many 130 million dollar F-22's do you think we can afford? the answer is not enough, so the $30-40 million JSF is the solution.
     
  7. vraa

    vraa F1 Rookie
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2003
    4,501
    Texas
    Full Name:
    Mr. A
    I love speed.
    I wonder what the F22's standing quarter mile is.
     
  8. ylshih

    ylshih Shogun Assassin
    Honorary Owner

    Mar 21, 2004
    20,266
    Northern CA
    Full Name:
    Yin
    It might be flying by then. I doubt the F22 numbers are public, but I recall the F15 Eagle can take off (airspeed about 130 Kts or 150 MPH) in 275 meters (900 feet).
     
  9. Artherd

    Artherd F1 Veteran

    Jun 19, 2002
    6,588
    Bay Area, CA
    Full Name:
    Ben Cannon
    Quick. I belive it's thrust to weight ratio is greater than 2.1:1... That's a lotta hooghpah.
     
  10. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Mar 1, 2002
    28,029
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir

    JSF ?



    All the countries that purchased the F-16, will need to replace their airframes. The JSF is the affordable replacement for the F-16. The JSF will be the meal ticket, for the US advanced aerospace industry.
     
  11. JimmyJ

    JimmyJ Formula Junior

    Jul 24, 2004
    281
    Denver, CO
    Full Name:
    Roy James
    My brother works at the Lockheed plant in FT Worth, and I got to go see the stealth technology in action on a dummy plane thanks to a security clearance. Just to clear one thing up, there are 4 variations of the F/A-22 and one will be able to take off vertically (as well as the JSF)
     
  12. hippo

    hippo Formula Junior

    May 25, 2005
    369
    KL,M'SIA
    Full Name:
    Andri
    -----------------------
    What a crock of s**t.

    The US military has a history of kicking azz, and that's why you aren't speaking German or Russian. Or are you?.[/QUOTE]

    geez you are amusing.let's just say the us military kick ass.but the whole point of the "americans underestimating foreign military" was meant to convey
    that they thought the mig-15(during the korean war,which they managed to down by the bucketloads due to cruddy korean training;but nevertheless they
    later were forced to rethink their aircraft design dur to the ***ot's capabilities
    in the hands of better pilots) as well as the "low-tech mig-29" (ditto that).
    why do u even think jets like the f-22/jsf exist?it's all to keep "each other" in
    check!
     
  13. TimN88

    TimN88 F1 Veteran

    Jun 12, 2001
    5,054
    Northeast
    Full Name:
    Tim
    No, the F-22 was made for the air force, who has no interest in vertical take off/landing capabilities. They dont even have any attack choppers. The only branch that wants a VTOL plane is the USMC. Also, stealth technology is stil kept under wraps so you didnt see anything classified unless you have a top secret and need to know.
     
  14. JimmyJ

    JimmyJ Formula Junior

    Jul 24, 2004
    281
    Denver, CO
    Full Name:
    Roy James
    And I do. I bid on gov't contracts that require a clearance, and fill positions with companies like Raytheon, Lockeed-Martin, & Northrup-Grumman.
     
  15. TimN88

    TimN88 F1 Veteran

    Jun 12, 2001
    5,054
    Northeast
    Full Name:
    Tim
    It seems where I work, a clearance isnt enough. They dont tell you sh_t unless you need it to do your job. You need a Q (DOE equivalent to a DOD top secret) just go into vault areas. Someone with an L (equivalent to a secret) cant even be escorted into a vault. They even had me working a component that was to be used in a test, but i didnt know what they were testing for, when the test was, or who ordered the test was for. Pretty much all i knew was the model of weapon that was being recertified. Ive heard it's even stricter at some places like Pantex, but then again you'd hope it is at a place where they take apart/put together nuclear weapons.
     
  16. JimmyJ

    JimmyJ Formula Junior

    Jul 24, 2004
    281
    Denver, CO
    Full Name:
    Roy James
    I know exactly what you are talking about. There were parts of Cheyenne Mountain that I didn't have access to. I was in the military and did a lot of stuff that was on a "Need-to-Know" basis. I attempt to get a good relationship with the contractors that I send my people to. I wanna know what they expect and what type of job they want my guys to do. Visiting the "black" areas of the FTW L-M plant took a lot of time, and pulling on the right strings. The fact that my brother works in that area definitely helped.
     
  17. 2000YELLOW360

    2000YELLOW360 F1 World Champ

    Jun 5, 2001
    19,800
    Full Name:
    Art
    One of my high school classmates writes books about military airplanes, and takes pictures of them. He has flown in just about every military airplane built, except the Raptor. His comments on the Mi29 & Su27 are that they are superior to the F16 & 15, but they lack the sophisticated electronics, which gives our planes an advantage. If the Russians or the Chinese ever get equal or better electronics, we'd better watch out.

    In Korea, the Russians claim that they had a substantial kill rate on our planes when the Migs were flown by the Russians, and the same claim for Viet Nam. No way to verify those claims however, and when their planes were flown by either the Chinese or Koreans, our kill rate was pretty good, so who knows. In that era, it was the pilots that made the difference.

    About 80- 81, as proven in the Becca Valley, electronics took over, and whoever saw the other guy first, lived. Our radars had about double the range of the Soviet block equipments, and the kill ratio was 82:1, our favor. The current Russian radar is about 100 miles, while our new stuff is at least 150 miles, which shows they are getting better.

    Art

    Art
     
  18. JimmyJ

    JimmyJ Formula Junior

    Jul 24, 2004
    281
    Denver, CO
    Full Name:
    Roy James
    Don't forget the Mig-25...That is one plane I would not go up against. But I think that's one of the reasons for the F/A-22
     
  19. ryalex

    ryalex Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 6, 2003
    25,766
    Las Vegas, NV
    Full Name:
    Ryan Alexander
    My father in law works there, but alas, I don't have any clearances at all. I'm not sure he does though - he manages part of the F-16 line. I did get a tour of that, and that was pretty cool. Over a mile long, and the planes are taken down the assembly line by a massive crane system.
     
  20. TimN88

    TimN88 F1 Veteran

    Jun 12, 2001
    5,054
    Northeast
    Full Name:
    Tim
    The Mig 25 is an example of how soviet technology wasnt as good as we thought it was. The F-15 was our answer. When we got our hands on one it turned out to be not as big of a threat as we thought. I think i mentioned this before, but the organization I work in had a scud missle recently for testing. The gyros were mounted on plywood!
     
  21. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Mar 1, 2002
    28,029
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir
    Mig 25 was designed as a hi altitude interceptor. The mission was to intercept the B 70 Valkyrie bomber. We never produced the bomber. SAC switched their tactics to low level penetration. The Mig 25 had little to do, other than attempting to counter the SR 71.


    Their was also a Mig 25R version. I understood that the engines were toasted after going one mission at Mach 2.7+.


    The F 15 is a completly different type of airplane.
     
  22. ryalex

    ryalex Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 6, 2003
    25,766
    Las Vegas, NV
    Full Name:
    Ryan Alexander

    It had a cool "Type R" decal set though.
     
  23. ralfabco

    ralfabco Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Mar 1, 2002
    28,029
    Dixie
    Full Name:
    Itamar Ben-Gvir

    LOL

    That was the SV version.
     
  24. ryalex

    ryalex Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 6, 2003
    25,766
    Las Vegas, NV
    Full Name:
    Ryan Alexander
    Now, you're not confusing that with the Tumansky V-TEC, are you?



    That's V, for Vlad.
     
  25. Poweredbyme91

    Poweredbyme91 Formula Junior

    Dec 9, 2004
    942
    Now in San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Hector Silva
    I've been waiting to see a F-22 demo at an airshow and no luck. It's one of my favorite jets of all time....
     

Share This Page