Possibly Procuring an Arrow... | FerrariChat

Possibly Procuring an Arrow...

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by Chupacabra, Apr 19, 2009.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Chupacabra

    Chupacabra F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2005
    3,529
    Behind a drum kit
    Full Name:
    Mr. Chupacabra
    Arrow II, to be exact, one of the 200 HP models. My plan is to use it for completing as many ratings as I can. Does anyone here have any ownership experience with these birds? I'm aware of the prop hub AD, I'd probably go ahead and have that replaced right off so I don't have to have the mandated inspection performed every 100 hours. I know the flying characteristics are basically the same as the Cherokees, and that is fine with me.

    The area I'm most concerned about is the total time -- at almost 7K, it's pretty high. All logs are complete and rather uneventful, but I realize it may be difficult to unload when the time comes to move up again. It has about 30K worth of new avionics, which is certainly a plus, the wings have been reskinned, fairly recent major, fresh paint, interior is good, everything except the autopilot is functioning beautifully, and the price is right. So, I'm concerned with getting stuck with it later, which may turn out to be a non-issue, who knows?

    OK, so I'm also concerned about the safety and life expectancy of the airframe. There is no evidence of corrosion, and it was recently (last week) inspected, but I'm still just a bit worried, especially if it really starts racking up hours. I haven't come across much that indicates an inclination toward in-flight breakups or failures in the Cherokee/Arrow/whatever else line, but I figured I'd ask around to see if I may have missed something.

    Thanks, I know I'm kinda' rambling...
     
  2. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    I've not owned one, but have flown them a little.
    Very solid, safe airplane if a little slow for a retract. If the airframe is well taken care of, not bent, then the hours would not bother me as much since you are using it as a ratings workhorse anyway.
     
  3. solofast

    solofast Formula 3

    Oct 8, 2007
    1,773
    Indianapolis
    #3 solofast, Apr 19, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2009
    If you want to move up to a bigger single, like a Bonanza, then no, just go get the Bonanza and learn to fly it. What you really need to learn to fly the Bonanza well you won't get out of the Arrow.

    One of the biggest parts of it is really speed and energy management. Yes you have to learn to manage the prop (ALL the balls to the wall when you have to go around) and when to put the gear down, but really, flying faster and more complex airplanes is about learning to stay ahead of the airplane and planning in advance how to manage your speed when you are coming down into the airport environment.

    Unfortunaltey the Arrow is kind of a "tweener" in terms of a complex airplane. It isn't really that fast and is kind of draggy, even with the gear up, so you don't learn some of the energy management skills that you need in a faster, heavier, cleaner airplane. It's good enough to get the complex signoff, but really not much more than that. If you are planning on moving up to to a twin, I would suggest that you get into a faster heavier single so that you learn the energy management skills in a faster single and then move up to the twin, you will be working on managing the twin engines and not trying to learn speed management at the same time.

    If you are looking for a complex signoff, then want to transition to something heavier and faster, you are going to need some instruction time, and if you get the faster airplane your time with the instructor getting the complex signoff, will be applied for insurance purposes as dual time in the faster airplane, which you will need anyway. Many insurance companies have a specified time of dual required to insure you in the complex airplane, so you might as well get it all at one time. In that case by the time you have enough hours to satisify your insurance company, you will have the signoff and be comfortable anyway.
     
  4. ea500guy

    ea500guy Rookie

    Mar 14, 2009
    33
    Hammond, LA
    Full Name:
    EP Pierce
    I had one in a flight school I ran in the 90's. Great airplane. Very forgiving, and the procedures you utilize to fly it proficiently will serve you well in nearly any piston airplane. Also, the IO360 is a wonderful powerplant.

    Why reskinned? Hail damage?
     
  5. Chupacabra

    Chupacabra F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2005
    3,529
    Behind a drum kit
    Full Name:
    Mr. Chupacabra
    Hey guys, thanks so much for the responses! I'm very glad to have a knowledgeable group to ponder these things with!

    Just figured out that it has LoPresti speed mods, so I suppose that is another plus.

    EA500, to be honest, I'm not 100% sure why it was reskinned -- something I'm looking into further. It is only the outboard sections of the tops of both wings, so I would imagine it could possibly be hail damage, maybe the fact that the fuselage and the rest of the plane is original can be attributed to a cover? I saw the plane numerous times before all of the work was done, and it looked fine to me, so I dunno. Like I said, I'm going to look into it a bit more.

    SNJ, you are correct, I'm planning to get my complex and instrument time, so it should theoretically perform just fine for now.

    Solofast, you definitely brought up some things I am concerned about and I think your advice is spot on. I do, at some point, want to start flying heavier and more complex aircraft, but as I see it right now, it will most likely be a little while before I can truly afford to purchase any of the aircraft I'm considering (a well-equipped modern Bonanza being near the top of the list). Unfortunately, no one around here has anything similar available on their flight lines for me to get into and start accumulating some time, either. Most of them have gone with fast fixed-gear singles, like DA-40s and SR-22s. In fact, the Arrow is the sole single engine complex at the flight school I use, and it's the same story elsewhere. I'm still not 100% sure I'm going to venture into twin territory...maybe down the road a bit just to do it, or to prepare for that L-39 I want to get into sometime :) I'm certainly not interested in OWNING a twin with the (in some cases) faster and more economical singles out there.

    I ran some numbers on how much the aircraft will net if it continues to fly as much as it did before the current owner decided to get out of the whole aviation deal. Looks like, if I do a leaseback thing, after figuring cost per hour at about $82.50 (w/ insurance, overhaul, inspections, etc.) it will make about $16,200 per year assuming 300 hrs. are flown. That's actually fairly realistic as, according to the logs, it was flying about 30-40 hours per month last spring/summer, and as I said, it's really the only game in town. Barring unforeseen circumstances, I would imagine I could apply that money toward something more stout before long depending on how much I put down. If I put around 20K down and managed to get 400 hrs. on it, it would pay for itself in a little over a year, year and a half, then just be a source of revenue, except for when s$#t breaks, which I KNOW it will! Plus, I can use my training and fuel as business write offs if I place the aircraft in our auto business or maybe my music biz as I do travel quite a bit.

    I don't know, I'm obviously new to the a/c ownership thing, so if I'm going in a bad direction here, please feel free to slap me! At any rate, safety is still, and always will be, the number one factor.
     
  6. ea500guy

    ea500guy Rookie

    Mar 14, 2009
    33
    Hammond, LA
    Full Name:
    EP Pierce
    My flight school averaged 100 hours per month on each aircraft. We were blowing and going--even managed to pay for a couple of airplanes. It was a whole lot of work, and after a few years I figured out that the bank was making more money than me. To heck with that! I liquidated; went back to school; and spent the next decade as a banker! (Eventually became a Vice President of the bank that turned me down for an aircraft loan while starting the flight school!)

    I am telling you this for two reasons: #1: It is funny. #2: So that you might believe me when I tell you that it is seriously difficult to make money on any piece of equipment that flies! Don't buy an airplane as an investment.
     
  7. Island Time

    Island Time F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 18, 2004
    11,997
    E. TN
    Full Name:
    David
    I wouldn't worry about the skins. Good paint, int, low eng hrs and radios all a plus. AF hrs DEFINATELY hurts price wise. It's all about the price (and this stuff isn't moving like it was a year ago either, though people like to price it like it is).

    Good luck w/ your decision and your training!
     
  8. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    Since you have determined what the primary use of this plane is for, a training mule, then you simply need to look at it as a tool and buy it for what will give you lowest flight hour cost and recoup as much of investment or zero it out. This is how the Air Force and the Alrlines buy planes, for the most part. For this, the Arrow is a good choice, but you need to leverage the economy and have minimum up front investment.

    Of course, the opposite of this thinking is buying a warbird... which makes no rational sense at all.
     
  9. zygomatic

    zygomatic F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Jun 19, 2008
    5,064
    Washington, DC
    Full Name:
    Chris
    #9 zygomatic, Apr 21, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 21, 2009

    If it did make sense, it wouldn't be half as much fun. Arrows are great aircraft, but you can't hang bombs off them.
     
  10. Chupacabra

    Chupacabra F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2005
    3,529
    Behind a drum kit
    Full Name:
    Mr. Chupacabra
    Yeah, I'm not very good at this "rational sense" stuff, either. I only pretend. :)

    Actually, simply zeroing it out would be fine by me. You're right, it will be a tool. As far as buying it as an investment...yeah, optimistic at best, I know. I guess the true investment is what I will be able to get done with it in a relatively short period.

    I'll bet I could figure out a way to get some hardpoints on it, though... :)
     
  11. SubLV

    SubLV Karting

    Apr 23, 2009
    222
    Oakville
    #11 SubLV, Apr 24, 2009
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2009
    The arrow is a nice plane, def. get the 200hp injected. The 360 line are amazing engines, and used in many planes (arrow, cherokee, da40, cardinal, etc etc etc).

    I wouldn't suggest jumping straight into a bonanza, sure many people do it, and its a heated topic whether its advisable or not, I'm of the school that thinks its not. You will have enough to learn in the arrow with the 2 extra levers. If you jump straight to the bonanza you will be behind the curve and behind the airplane the whole time, which can, unfortunately, prove deadly in the end.

    As for the high TT, I always say that paint, avionics and interior can be improved with money, but you can't buy lower TT (once you own the airplane of course).

    Even if you buy the plane now with nice paint, avionics, etc. that stuff will fade, tear, be rendered "obsolete" etc. with time. 30k in avionics is nice, but if it doesn't have a G600, 530, 430, 340 and 327 its already outdated. If you put 400 hours on it, it's bound to get chips in the paint, tears in the interior, cracks in the plastic, etc. and when you go sell it it'll be just another 7.5k TT arrow with average cosmetics, and you'll take a financial hit trying to unload it.

    Another thing, was it a school plane? If so you can bet it was banged, dropped onto the runway, etc. and that's not good in cherokees. Cherokees have the gear which attaches to the root of the wing, its not like a cessna, and subsequently some say they are a bit more delicate. Let alone the fact that this is an RG, so keep that in mind.

    If you just want it as a trainer, I say go find something with lower time with acceptable interior and paint, don't buy a cream puff. That is, of course, if you're mostly worried about coming out clean, if you have money to burn then buy what you like and fly the wings off of it.

    As for the leaseback I say forget it. An airplane is a very personal thing, and expensive to maintain. You don't want to be over water, without land in sight and start thinking about what the other pilots might have done to it that they didn't tell you about. Not only that, financially it might not even prove to be beneficial; no one will ever care for your plane like you, because they don't own it, so "why should they". Unfortunately this is how it goes, go look at a rental airplane.

    If you've any more questions just ask.


    BTW the arrow isn't a bad plane, 140kt on 9 gal/hr is pretty decent for what it is.
     

Share This Page