Qualifying change? | FerrariChat

Qualifying change?

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by F1racer, May 19, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. F1racer

    F1racer F1 Rookie

    Oct 5, 2003
    4,749
    Laval
    Full Name:
    Jean
    "According to reports, Bernie Ecclestone and the FIA have changed the qualifying format. As of the European GP there will only be one qualifying on Saturday."
    I saw this news only on Auto Motor und Sport. I guess they're the first to write about it...

    http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/d/83152

    ps: I can't read german.
     
  2. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Interesting and you got the jist right:

    Starting with the Nuerburgring GP there will be only one qualifying session on Saturday. The order of the cars is the reversal of the previous GP's results. The cars will do single laps and in full race configuration.

    In essence we're going back to what we had last year, but this time only with one session. The article further states that the teams were already unhappy at Bahrain and this new proposal came from Ron Dennis and was accepted by all teams therefore meeting the requirements of the Concorde agreement. Other proposals from Briatore and Ferrari were not accepted.
     
  3. imperial83

    imperial83 F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    May 14, 2004
    2,893
    More circus type Mickey Mouse rule changes!
    Another reason why the 2005 season holds no value.
     
  4. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Your beloved team agreed to this change.

    I liked the aggregate format for various reasons, but mostly for the fact, that session 1 was like the good ol' days with drivers going flat out in qualifying trim. That is now gone and we're back to a somewhat meaningless session where theoretically a Minardi on fumes could snatch pole.
     
  5. 4i2fly

    4i2fly Formula 3

    Apr 16, 2004
    1,333
    SF, Bay Area

    I second that...the flying lap was quite entertaining and I am upset that it will be eliminated.
     
  6. F1racer

    F1racer F1 Rookie

    Oct 5, 2003
    4,749
    Laval
    Full Name:
    Jean
    Thanks for the infos.
    Auto Motor und sport are saying its official? ITV-f1 has an article about qualifying. The way they talk about it, the deal isn't done yet.
    http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=32869

    I WANT the old system of one hour with 12 laps !!!$%# Come On!!
    Last years qualifying session was no good and this years is not that better.
     
  7. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    According to "Auto Motor + Sport" it is a done deal.

    I agree with you btw, that this is a fairly good source. Not the best, that would be "Motorsport aktuell", but still pretty good.
     
  8. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis

    That is of course unless Ferrari wins then it will be the greatest season ever!!!!!!!!!!!! :D
     
  9. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis
    The aggregate deal had to go. It was generally disliked, at least by me. ;). I also didn't like the final qualifying on sunday either. I really would like it to go back to the old days, open session, low tanks, new tires, let's see what you got. I can deal with one set of tire for the race but i feel qualifying tires should come back as well as open sessions. Not a big fan of parc ferme right after qualifying either. they should have qualifying and race set ups.
     
  10. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Agreed on all except for the qualifying tires: You can only bring those back if there is no tire war or you compromise safety. As long as you have more than one tire manufacturer it is a wise idea to use racing tires for qualifying.
     
  11. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis
    I'm not really sure how Q tires affect safetly but i'll buy that.
     
  12. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Qualyfying tires = super grip = high speeds in corners = if you loose it, you buy the farm

    race tires = long duration compound = hard compound = less grip etc etc
     
  13. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis
    That's were driver skill comes in. Isn't the point the make the car go as fast as it can?
     
  14. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Whenever there are discussions about F1 safety, it is all about how to reduce the cornering speeds, making the run off areas in corners bigger etc. The straight line speed of the cars barely bothers anybody, it is all about the corners. That's why skirts were banned and that's why grooved tires were introduced and that's why Tilke builds all new tracks with the same old same old medium speed turns. A qualifying tire would face the same issues.
     
  15. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis
    While this might be true, the idea behind a qualifying tire would be to fit with the rules. There is probably no way you could use those hard tires for a effective hot lap. While a Q tire would increase cornering speeds I wonder by just how much. If you make them just a tad softer that what they are now the difference would not be so great.
     
  16. imperial83

    imperial83 F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    May 14, 2004
    2,893
    My beloved team agreed to change it because their suggested format was not approved. there is only so much Ferrari can do. Anything the team suggests is thrown out because none of the other teams want them to win and the first two jack asses that stand up their and yell FOUL are Paul Stoddart and Eddie Jordan!
     
  17. imperial83

    imperial83 F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    May 14, 2004
    2,893
    If Ferrari can mount a come back and Michael Schumacher can win the World Campionship it will prove that despite unfair Mickey Mouse circus rules designed to give Ferrari a short hand, Ferrari are still the greatest team in F1. Either way, if any other team win the World Championship it will be a hollow victory and not a real championship.

    PS: Ferrari chat while waiting in airport lounges is fun!
     
  18. racerx3317

    racerx3317 F1 Veteran

    Oct 17, 2004
    5,701
    New York, NY
    Full Name:
    Luis
    I can't even respond to that, i'm laughing too hard. So how about those yankees............LMAO!
     
  19. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    The Concorde agreement is supposed to stabilize rule changes so if you want an impromptu change like this, you need unanimous approval from all teams. So if SF doesn't like it, they can simply veto the proposal and that'll be the end of it.

    The article doesn't mention Minardi or Jordan, it only mentions a majority of teams as in favor of the change. However my guess would be, particularly those two teams would have probably preferred the system used until now because it gives them a 2nd opportunity to showcase their cars in single car qualifying. Just my guess.

    PS: Have a safe flight!
     
  20. imperial83

    imperial83 F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    May 14, 2004
    2,893
    I know that Scuderia Ferrari under the concorde agreement can veto a proposal. However, Jean Todt has said on several occasions that Ferrari cannot veto any thing it does not like. Nothing would get accomplished and F1 would not move forward. So Ferrari has to settle for second best regulations because if they veto a rule change then they are considered the bad guys and first to the microphone in front of the pres is Paul Stoddart yelling foul!
     
  21. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Ok, I got your point.

    Question is however, whether anybody still listens to Stoddart after Melbourne?
    :)
     
  22. imperial83

    imperial83 F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    May 14, 2004
    2,893
    Stoddart unfortunately also has Veto powers. He missuses them. The minute Ferrari state something or propse something everyone pounces on it and says NO! Regardless if the idea makes sense or not.

    Stoddart will suffer as a result of Melbourne. In his point of view he was justified by what he did. But when you come out with regulation spec cars the day after a circus show, you lose all credibility.

    I really want to see the 1 hour qualification format from 2000 return. This single lap stuff is incredibly mundane and stupid!

    PS: Flight cancelled... wait list for next flight... I love flying!
     
  23. JaguarXJ6

    JaguarXJ6 F1 Veteran

    Feb 12, 2003
    5,533
    Black Hawk, CO
    Full Name:
    Sunny
    The only thing bothering me at all about this season is the never ending list of excuses by imperial83 until season 2006 begins. LOL!

    Ferrari is perfect and never makes mistakes, so sayeth imperial. So it must be the rules. Yeah, thats it.
     
  24. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,624
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Swiss Blick confirmed the changes to qualifying btw. It really is a done deal starting at Nuerburgring.
     

Share This Page