Racing series with NO technical rules. | FerrariChat

Racing series with NO technical rules.

Discussion in 'Other Racing' started by RussianM3_dude, Apr 15, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. RussianM3_dude

    RussianM3_dude F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Mar 15, 2004
    4,097
    Switzerland/Montreal
    Full Name:
    Nikolai Petroff
    Well, only one... cars have to maintain contact with the ground. Wouldn't that be grand? Turbo V8s, I-16s, flat 10s, 8 wheel drive, ground effects etc... The ULTIMATE racing series with no artificial, flavour of the year guidelines. Costs would also be fairly low, since teams with small budgets would simply try to find low cost effective NOVEL solutions.

    Isn't this what causes such expense in F1 in the first place? Technical regulations forcing expotentially greater spending on expotentially smaller results?
     
  2. IanMac

    IanMac Formula 3

    Jul 26, 2006
    1,455
    Scotland
    Full Name:
    Ian
    I don't think it would work, at least not in terms of keeping costs down. Teams are in it to win, or at worst to be reasonably competitive. In a series where absolutely anything goes the cost of developing and running a competitive car could, potentially, be huge. It costs a lot to find low cost solutions! ;)
     
  3. J. Salmon

    J. Salmon F1 Rookie
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Aug 27, 2005
    4,367
    VA
    It would also be deadly. It is hard enough to keep drivers safe with the regulations they have now. This would be like the old days where the one with the biggest doodads gets the trophy. Until that fateful day where things go a bit wry...

    As much as like to see a good crash, I am not interested in seeing anyone get hurt.
     
  4. Anthony_Ferrari

    Anthony_Ferrari Formula 3

    Nov 3, 2003
    2,365
    Sheffield, UK
    Full Name:
    Anthony Currie
    I would make the series have some rules:
    1) No computers of any kind.
    2) The vehicle must be controlled completely by just 1 driver who is in the car.

    It would never happen because of the safety and cost aspects, but I wonder what lap times they could produce?
     
  5. RussianM3_dude

    RussianM3_dude F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Mar 15, 2004
    4,097
    Switzerland/Montreal
    Full Name:
    Nikolai Petroff
    BASE jumping is VERY dangerous, yet it still exists as a sport. With modern crash protection... who knows... it won't be that dangerous.

    +1 on the no computers (controlling the car, not the components.) and only one driver though.
     
  6. mousecatcher

    mousecatcher Formula 3

    Dec 18, 2007
    2,116
    san mateo, ca
    i disagree. costs would be astronomical.

    no, F1 expenses are actually held in check by the rules.
     
  7. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    I have always thought of this as a kind of high-school boys study hall nerd dream.

    It has been tried before - Formula Libre, I think it was called. It was not a high point in the sport.

    The "anything goes" approach is understandable with heavy tanks or fighter planes, but we all know where THAT got us.
     
  8. Ney

    Ney F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 20, 2004
    7,370
    This has been done in the past. It is not a cheaper solution and there is often no parity between teams leading to fewer and fewer fans as the outcome is a forgone conclusion. Please review the CanAm series as it grew out of USRRC, went through the McLaren Bruce and Denny years and was ultimately flattened by the Porsche 917K30 and the UOP Shadows. Great racing series, but rules eventually creep in, $ expended goes up and the series folds due to lack of sponsorship, fans and in todays world, broadcast $.
     
  9. YellowbirdRS

    YellowbirdRS Formula 3

    Nov 9, 2005
    1,765
    DFW/RGV/MX
    Full Name:
    Xavier
    old F1 when you can add 2 extra tires to have some grips like Tyrell did or intoduce the turbo and the water injected engines like Renault did or the electronic suspention the TC smart chassis balance like one more time Renult did.

    Yes, that was the years when the only thing to worry about was to win the race in one pice.
     
  10. Senna1994

    Senna1994 F1 World Champ

    Nov 11, 2003
    13,192
    Orange County
    Full Name:
    Anthony T
    How about the old Can Am?
     
  11. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    Interesting you should ask that. If you do a wikipedia on "Formula Libre" there is an article that goes into the old old 1931 Libre rules, the various attempts through the 50s and 60s, and also Can Am.

    What it basically says there is that the Can Am was finally dominated into non-existence first by the McLaren cars of Bruce and Denny, (nobody else could compete at their heights), and the nail was pounded in the coffin by the Porsche 917K compressor cars. Some might make the point that Jim Hall started the ball rolling with the wings.

    The 1930s Grand Prix cars also suffered from an overkill - in that case the Germans. 2KG too heavy; fine - send me some workers and we will sand off all the paint.

    This seems to be a fault of relaxed rules racing - whoever can put up the most cubic dollars wins. (Despite the fine efforts of one Tazio Nuvolari and the Ferrari/Alfa cars. Nuvolari had to finally give up and drive for the Germans.
     
  12. shahedc

    shahedc Formula 3

    Jun 4, 2007
    1,625
    Washington DC
    #12 shahedc, Apr 15, 2008
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    no rules?

    then, we would have 6 wheeled monstrosities like this:
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  13. Lemke

    Lemke F1 Rookie

    Oct 27, 2004
    4,644
    Vancouver, WA
    Full Name:
    Daniel
    Is that real?
     
  14. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    I think I saw it in "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen".
     
  15. shahedc

    shahedc Formula 3

    Jun 4, 2007
    1,625
    Washington DC
    yep, it's real.. search for Covini in Google and Wikipedia.

    ~shahedc
    .
     
  16. Mr Payne

    Mr Payne F1 Rookie

    Jan 8, 2004
    2,878
    Bakersfield, CA
    Full Name:
    Payne
    Drivers would die. We are talking about continual 8-9 Gs under braking & turning. Probably around 3-4 under acceleration. I doubt they could be piloted by humans.

    2000hp, sub 1000 lbs, full ground effect (possibly with fans), enclosed wheels, 6 wheel cars with 4 rear drive wheels. We are talking about a lap time reduction of about ~30 seconds per lap from F1 currently.

    It's very easy to be faster than F1. It's very hard to be faster than F1 and maintain the same safety standards.
     
  17. speedy4500

    speedy4500 Formula Junior

    Sep 19, 2004
    339
    With the recent push for energy efficient transportation, why not have a racing series similar to this (unlimited tech) but with the constraint that each driver has X gallons of fuel for qualifying and the race.

    This would encourage novel technical solutions, have real world repercussions, and also limit the deadliness of an "unlimited" series to which others have alluded--you can only create so much kinetic energy from a given amount of fuel, if speeds get too high simply reduce the amount of fuel available for use.

    Any thoughts? Who wants to help me start this series? :)
     
  18. Seth

    Seth Formula 3

    Feb 8, 2004
    1,551
    Texas
    thats a rule though... cant have any rules
     
  19. wax

    wax Five Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jul 20, 2003
    52,415
    SFPD
    Full Name:
    Dirty Harry
    We have that in the states - why, there's "Destruction Derby" and "Figure 8 Racing" and "Enduro" and "Trailer Racing"...

    http://www.wecrash.com/

    Max's worst nightmare;

    Some basic ground rules we want everyone to understand about this organization: we will never promote an event, we will never charge for services, in fact we will try to not charge for anything. Donations(promoters/classifieds) and selling T-shirt/decal etc.. should be enough to do everything we need to do as an organization.

    Here's their rules...
    http://www.wecrash.com/rules.rtf

    ...and their forum
    http://srt.suddenlaunch.com/index.cgi?board=figure

    Including "Greatest Hits"
    http://srt.suddenlaunch.com/index.cgi?board=figure&action=display&num=1196104457
     
  20. Agent Smith

    Agent Smith Formula 3

    Apr 20, 2002
    1,737
    Sure, like when they made everyone switch from a V10 engine to a V8 thus making everyone come up with a whole new design :)
     
  21. F&M racing

    F&M racing Formula Junior

    Feb 26, 2006
    668
    Michigan
    Full Name:
    JimF
    Can Am is a pure example of why this wouldn't work, cost in today's dollars would be mind boggling!! Another example is "D" Sports racing in S.C.C.A bascially pretty open in a lot of ways on what you can do except for safety, needs four wheels, and a engine displacement rule. This class was for the free thinkers, tinkering people, engineers, now it's super expensive. There's a car I was looking at last month that's being built here locally and they have a few 100K invested in it already, amateur racing folks!!!
    In racing classes in general we need some kind of rule that would make today's spec type cars look all different instead of cookie cutter cars.
     

Share This Page