Exactly. And who is so egocentric that their version is correct to the exclusion of everyone else? Well there are a few here I suppose.
So how much would a high quality restoration cost for a beautiful Pininfarina 330 GT 2+2, 365 GT 2+2 or 365 GT4 2+2 assuming it needs everything rebuilt that would include the full body, paint, chassis, suspension, brakes, engine, gearbox, drive shaft, axle, wheels, electrics and interior? These fabulous cars deserve as much care and preservation as their 2 seater counterparts. Just my opinion of course.
I suspect it would be very difficult for someone paying for a restoration to accept a car that's of a build quality similar to that of the new car when it left the factory That opens some questions about the truthfulness of restorations... and to me that's a reason to be flexible about what a restoration could be, although I suppose I would still be shocked by a really terrible execution.
If I had a crystal ball I’d be buying Powerball tickets and not restoring old cars. Every car is different and there are always surprises.
Of course every car is different. Yes, how long is a piece of string? You've worked on and rebuilt P cars, 250 GTOs and their like. In your opinion is less skill and work required to restore one of the above than the currently higher value 2 seater cars, given 2 cars in the same condition? Or is more work required? They do have 2 more seats, interior fittings, a longer wheelbase/chassis and bodywork to take into account. I am not asking about P cars as these do cost more to rebuild/restore.
OK, let’s ask the next question…Restoration or Preservation! Some shops buy every new reproduction part available. Pretty results but not my preference. Spending three days bringing an original tail light lense back to life is preserving history. A proper restoration involves literally removing every body panel, repairing all the support tubes, frame tubes, and repairing each original body panel while saving as much of the original coach work as possible. This is usually the “choke” point in any restoration. All these parts are made from scratch. One of the 250 GTOs I did was a preservation done at great pains to be exactly as it left the factory. The owner drove it once and had the body completely removed and destroyed, to be replaced by a perfectly symmetrical perfect body built with an English wheel ( read incorrectly ). Not my idea of a historically correct restoration. You are correct in saying race cars are infinitely easier than road cars with lavish interiors and HVAC systems. Again, there is no correct answer to your question.
Steve: Again, you have asked a very difficult question to answer. No doubt the 2+2 cars would require many more labor hours than a 250 GTO in SIMILAR condition. They are much more complex cars. The problem is the comp cars have probably had harder lives and bringing one back to original will add hours to the project, as major portions of the bodywork may have to be recreated from scratch. Also the comp cars may require many hours in research, while the 2+2 has a factory Parts Book and possibly a Shop Manual to serve as reference and guidance to the restorer. Today to restore a 2+2 to factory original would cost maybe $400-600,000 at a top notch shop. However, it all depends how bad the car is to start with. It could easily be much more expensive.
A decade ago Auto Restorations in Christchurch, New Zealand were getting a lot of high end work from people such as Peter Giddings and Carlos Monteverde because they had the knowledge base AND were charging in NZD, roughly half of USD. Today a lot of the used car market requires a top name such as RM Auto Restorations, Paul Russell or Cremonini or DK Engineering or Patrick Ottis or any one of a twenty or so well known shops to truly pull the big money when selling......I guess it gives confidence? Even at $1mm it still should wash out over a long enough time frame.
Thank you, Dyke. Always a great pleasure to read your informed replies from many years experience. Please do not take the following as me doubting what you say as it's me questioning my own reasoning. I just find it hard to get my head around a restoration on a 2+2 costing significantly less than a 275 GTB if the same level of expertise and care is being applied. The later 2+2s such as 365 GT4 2+2s were significantly more expensive being more complex as generally having power steering, air conditioning and with hard to get at 6 carbs. The 2+2s certainly were not any less mechanically complex or sophisticated. In 1973 a 365 GT4 2+2 in the UK cost £12,996 GBP whereas a 365 GTB/4 was £10,997 so around 18% more expensive. From the 1960s a 330 GT 2+2 was more expensive than a 275 GTB also. There is just more material of them to restore. Going off on a tangent here but a mechanically similar 365 GTB/4 also should cost more than a 275 GTB (SOHC) to restore as they have 4 cams. All 365 GTB/4s have 6 carbs whereas most 275 GTBs have 3 carbs. Like I said in a previous post, I don't often see the 2+2s being restored by these "top restoration" houses. Actually I can't remember seeing one. As my original post was including Boxers, a new 365 GT4 BB cost £15,492 in October 1973 which was a massive 41% more than a 365 GTB/4. October 1973 price list from Motor magazine. Image Unavailable, Please Login Whilst you charge the same hourly rate for all cars, there are others that do charge more for higher priced cars, as posted by @LVP488 here. Clearly Boxers and 2+2s are not getting restored to the same very high standard as the earlier 2 seater more valuable cars but there does seem to be a disparity in the costs being charged for the work done with higher prices on the simpler 2 seater earlier cars for less work than on the more substantial 2+2 and complex Boxers requiring more work. All just my opinion and possibly incorrect view of how I percieve things to be and a case of the laws of supply and demand applying to the restoration world costs with some charging as much as they possibly can.
Steve: The one thing your reasoning maybe be missing is the cost and availability of parts. Most 2+2's were built in fairly large quantities and a number have been parted out over the years, so parts (primarily bodywork, interior and trim) for these cars are far easier to source than those for a 275 GTB or GTS. It takes both time and money to locate and acquire parts and all this adds to the cost of restorations.
OK, I'll say it, restoration shops charge more per work for more valuable cars. You can analyze some of it away original model count and available parts. Also as you said some of the more expensive models are actually less complicated restorations in many ways. I don't have a problem with it at all, I believe in market pricing and the restoration market is higher on a mid-7 digit car vs. a mid-6 digit car.
The gentleman who posted earlier regarding the increasing costs of automotive paints made a very good point and and to further clarify how this effects todays overall restoration costs, I went back and reviewed our material costs for the bodywork restoration on the 225 Sport. We spent $13,711.06 on paints, primers, fillers, abrasives, cleaners, buffing pads, polishes, etc. 20 years ago, a number like that would be impossible.
Different coach builders can require considerably different levels of research time and may require considerably different levels of labor due to the intricacy of relatively minor parts. We also know some coach builders cars were much more prone to rust. The 375MM recently finished by Bob Smith took massive time for all the intricacies of coach details and its engine required a massive amount of time to resolve a very botched prior repair. I heard its total man hours from Bob and was floored.
Bob Smith’s efforts paid off. I believe he got a Best in Class at Pebble Beach. Again I contend it’s about criteria. Twenty years ago I interviewed for the position as General Manager at Paul Russel’s. During the final interview Paul asked me if I had a choice between a 99 point car which ran like a rocket ship and a 100 point car that ran reasonably which would I choose? Without hesitation I said the 99 point car to which he replied “my clients pay me to win Pebble Beach, not build Rocket Ships”. ( I did not get the job ) Obviously I come from a very different place and my restorations must perform as well as they look. I believe there’s an extra mile the PB guys go and it costs $$$ to get there.
This ^ to a some extent confirms something I've heard, more than once, from several colleagues/friends that after they or their clients have acquired various Pebble Beach BiC or BoS winning cars actually needing significant amounts time and money (5-6 figures) to make them practically & reliably drivable/usable.
250 GT/E 2+2, 330 GT 2+2, 365 GT 2+2, 365 GTC/4 and 365 GT4 2+2 were built in quite similar low numbers to the 275 GTBs costing the $800k+ to restore. Parts for the 2+2s were quite difficult to get in the 70s. My father had trouble getting parts for his 330 GT 2+2 (6199). I always remember the boxes of spares eventually coming from Maranello Concessionaires in Egham, Surrey as a young boy.
In the same vain, about 20 years ago I did a "complete/full" (or technically far beyond factory standards/quality) restoration on a late 1950's American Luxury (production) car and while I don't have the receipts handy, I'm pretty sure the material & supply costs for he body & paint work were that or more back then, but given the subject is/was about twice (or more ?) the size of a 225 S, it should make sense*. That same car/project, being what it was, had enough "brightwork", i.e. chrome plated die-cast and steel, anodized aluminum & brushed or polished stainless trim to make the most "blinged" Ferrari ever look like a "plain Jane" and the costs of refinishing all that (by a shop accustomed to do PB, etc level work) was over $65K, not counting my time of countless hours pre-fitting/-forming everything (again) to better than factory standards. I would expect same refinish work today costing at least $120K-$150K. * But as I mentioned before, people with little to no experience usually focus and/or get hung up on comparing "$/etc" figures without understanding technicality differences between restorations & restorations or complexity & size between each, not mention (yet again) the fact that each job and how or by whom its done is always different (<- this is why I don't do or have never done work for "general public". Not worth the headaches of trying to explain all this every time).
"Some" of every single profession and job title on planet earth do a bad job. BFD. And of those "Some" not only in bad work but also the top of the list in the cost category is Classiche. What do you do for a living?
Classiche are not the only ones it seems. And yes it is a BFD in my book. Classic and performance car sales.
... and expect some sort of a "flat rate" or pre-determined cost break-down/estimate, like they do when taking their daily drivers for an annual service, brake job, oil change or tire rotation.
Steve: There is a BIG difference in trying to find body parts for a long nose GTB (about 200 cars) and a 330 GT 2+2 (almost 1,100 cars). The 330s are FIVE times more common.
Well, no Dyke. That is incorrect. You are comparing only one evolution within the 275 Berlinetta series of cars which actually totalled over 800 cars and that's not counting the Spyders which adds another 199 odd which share most of the engine and drive train parts with the 275 GTB 2. There were a few series/evolutions of 330 GT 2+2s as well, with for example only 460 Series 2 330 GT 2+2 2 headlamp models out of the 1087 odd total. And don't forget that on top of the 213 long nose 2 cam 275 GTB there were also 350 275 GTB/4s and 10 275 GTS/4 NARTS which were also long nose which shared many body parts, so at least 563 long nose 275 berlinettas. So the BIG difference in numbers is nowhere as big as you state and the 330s are certainly NOT FIVE times more common.
Steve: You don't read well. I specifically mentioned BODY PARTS, not mechanical parts. My statements were 100% correct. It doesn't matter now, as I am done talking with you on this subject.