(from autosport) (Ron Dennis' Speech April 1, 2008 In Bahrain to MSBF) McLaren team principal Ron Dennis has called for an evolutionary, rather than revolutionary, approach to shaping Formula One's future, after outlining his vision for the sport over the next decade in a presentation to delegates at the Motor Sport Business Forum in Bahrain. Following his speech, Dennis, the CEO and president of the McLaren Group, earned a prolonged standing ovation as well as public praise from the CEO of Honda's F1 team, Nick Fry, and Red Bull Racing team principal Christian Horner, who were also speaking at the event. "I passionately believe that the most glorious chapters of Formula One history are yet to come," said Dennis. "As long as we maintain systems that encourage competitive racing via regulatory stability, and foster entrepreneurial freedom, yet reflect the world's changing environmental priorities, then the future of F1 can be every bit as glorious as we want it to be." Dennis called for the sport's rule-makers to ensure new regulations maintain stability within the sport and contain, or even lower, team's operating budgets through sustained and measured evolution rather than widespread sweeping changes. "For F1 to continue to thrive in the way it has thrived all these years, we'll need rules that foster freedom of entrepreneurship, but we'll also need rules that encourage close and competitive racing," he said. "If we can frame those rules in such a way as to keep costs in check, or even reduce costs, so much the better. "Because every time the rules are changed, the result is almost always a cost increase. And, because the smaller teams are perhaps less able to meet those cost increases, they may not respond as effectively to a rule change as their more affluent competitors. "Yet we must change the rules, because the world is changing. But, because we also need regulatory stability, our rule changes must be evolutionary, not revolutionary." Dennis said it was clear that F1 is not immune to the environmental challenges facing the world and applauded the FIA's efforts to shape the sport's future in this regard. "We must respond to environmental concerns - and, as Ive said, perhaps that response may require rule changes," he said. "KERS, or Kinetic Energy Recovery Systems, if developed prudently, will be a sensible and innovative system whereby the waste heat produced by braking can be harnessed and re-used in a way that may be adapted and then adopted by the production cars of the future. "F1 is uniquely well-placed to showcase and spread awareness of environmental messages... and the FIA has shown great enlightenment in showing the way so early." But Dennis also warned against regulations that effected the sport's ability to remain at the 'pinnacle of motorsport' and said that a great deal of thought must go in to shaping the rulebook to ensure F1's continued success. "F1 must remain the pinnacle of motorsport - from an engineering point of view as well as from every other point of view," he said. "The day when F1 stakeholders and I include F1 fans in that categorisation - begin to doubt F1's status as the pinnacle of motor sport, we are lost. "We need to make F1 less expensive, too, and we need to do that very carefully as well," he added. "In order for F1 to continue to thrive in the way it has thrived over the past half-century, we must foster an environment wherein entrepreneurship can continue to flourish freely. "Entrepreneurship remains essential to the future development of F1. "If all the current F1 teams are to be involved fruitfully in terms of the profitable enjoyment of every F1 stakeholder, and if the six major car manufacturers currently involved in F1 are to continue to maximise the return on their investment Mercedes-Benz or Daimler, of course, but also Ferrari or Fiat, Renault, BMW, Honda and Toyota, then the rules by which we go motor racing must be conducive to that entrepreneurship." ON 20 RACE CAP FOR F1: McLaren team principal Ron Dennis says he welcomes Formula One's global expansion over the next decade but on the proviso that the sport's calendar does not stretch beyond 20 races per season. In his speech to delegates at the Motor Sport Business Forum in Bahrain, Dennis said he applauded F1's drive into new markets, listing Russia, India, South Korea, Abu Dhabi, Qatar as new venues, but added that it was essential the grand prix racing stayed within its 'natural logistical limit'. "I welcome this expansion, and heartily commend Bernie Ecclestone for spearheading it," he said "But I have two provisos: Firstly, that the season never expands to more than 20 grands prix, which I regard as a natural logistical limit and, secondly, that we preserve a closed season over the winter. "The closed season is essential not only for logistical reasons but also in order to stir up a sense of anticipation in the hearts and minds of F1 fans." Dennis explained that F1's traditional winter break played a hugely important role in the build-up to a new season and that the hype generated by it was crucial to the sport's global exposure. "The best-selling editions of Formula 1 magazines are always the season preview editions, for example, not the editions that are published during the season. "And that's because a sense of anticipation has been stirred up in the hearts and minds of Formula 1 fans over the preceding winter. So, as I say, we must preserve that."
I think he hit the nail on the head with all of those points...... I like his phrase of 'logistical limitations'. Kevin S. Orchard Park, NY
20 races is pretty good. Or else you begin to have races every weekend or have to expand the calendar.
Can't believe I'm agreeing with Ron Dennis. But I think the devil is in the details. How do you make F-1 cheaper for entrants? they tried to let people buy a chassis & engine and then Bernie & Max put the kiabosh on that... I don't understand why that was a bad thing? You would have had Prodrive in F-1, and who knows who else... I to keep F-1 interesting you have to have variety, and frankly a 2 liter V-8 is not very interesting... a 1.5 liter V-12, V-10, V-16 now that is interesting. Carbon Fiber - interesting, KERS, titanium, Active suspension, active aero, etc... now that is interesting. I think there should be a provison for larger capasity Hydrogen powered cars, alternative fuel cars, but with exotic powerplants. How about a 500cc quad turbo V-16? F-1 needs to push the technical envelope so that it will eventually trickle down to normal road cars. in the 80's EFI, and all the computer controlled diagnostics of F-1 are now common on the cheapest cars... that improves the breed... CFD simulations so you can shave a thou of a second with a flip up on a barge board... that in my opinion does not help make road cars any better. Make them run on treaded tires, so manufactures can experiment on better road car tires... to me its that kind of stuff that makes F-1 sexy, and the ultimate... you go ther to see things you cant see anywhere else. ALMS cars are just if not more technologically advanced... at least on par with CFD, and engine technology. Only the ALMS rules keep the cars in check. F-1 has painted its self in a corner and is slowly realizing it. frankly other than Toyota, and Honda, how many Indians, or Malaysians, or Chinese are going to by Ferrari's or BMW's and Merc's... I know they are huge markets, but the % for top dollar stuff is limited.... Ferrari probabbly can grow, but your only talking a couple thousand cars, for BMW and Mercedes, you have to sell many thousands ... I'm done with my rant. Cheers!
+1 I wouldn't mind seeing different powerplants, and i'm not talking about piston engines either. I want to see some crazy radical kind of **** in the future and this engine freeze isn't promoting that.