Running a Track Day - Ideas | FerrariChat

Running a Track Day - Ideas

Discussion in 'Australia' started by ferrarifixer, Mar 14, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. ferrarifixer

    ferrarifixer F1 Veteran
    BANNED

    Jul 22, 2003
    8,520
    Melbourne
    Full Name:
    Phil Hughes
    Ok, I think the recent F and M club days are giving totally inadequate track time, due to over complication of groupings and unnecessary fussing.

    Who's got ideas. Committee meetings rarely have the time/people to address the problems fully, so lets make it known here, then hopefully something productive will come up.........

    From my own point of view...

    1) DONT run the race cars in the first session of the day. the cars are rarely warmed up and ready, so just run them later on.

    2) DONT have groups. It's much better for a much faster car to have more opportunities/patience to pass a much slower car, that grouping similar cars together, which forces pressure to pass or get stuck.

    3) DONT queue the cars in the service lane at PI. It just grid locks the place.

    4) DONT have only 2 timed laps. Have 4 or 5. Much time is wasted getting them in and out. It took over 6 hours to do 33 laps.

    5) DONT yell and shout at the patrons like they're 4 year olds. Give them credit for some intelligence. PA systems are easily misheard, and all you need is a sheet up so we can all see the group running order and we'll have no problems.

    Ok, who else........
     
  2. stephens

    stephens F1 Rookie
    Lifetime Rossa

    Feb 13, 2004
    4,647
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Stephen S
    Same text as I posted in the other thread;

    I am mindful of the fact that the organisers are volunteers and are probably trying their best. It is a thankless task, and impossible to please all of the people all of the time. I would suggest however, that the organisers attend a bike ride day for some tips on organising these events for maximum participant enjoyment.
    My suggestions would be;
    Larger groups - 12 cars
    Longer practice sessions 20-25min instead of 10-15minutes
    Five laps in timed session, with fewer sessions. There were 5 timed sessions in the afternoon for some. Three longer sessions would have been better.
    With longer sessions, there would be less time wasted changing groups, effectively giving more overall time on the track.
    As to no grouping, my experience is this would only work with an open pit system, otherwise drivers should be grouped into approximately similar timed groups, or at least experienced and inexperienced. It is too easy for slower/less experienced drivers to be scared into a careless accident. There is also just as much chance of a faster driver making a careless pass in their haste to getting an unobstructed lap. With an open pit there is no pressure to get "good" laps in as you have unlimited time to do so.
    This, however, is an issue for the Committee, I would have thought...
     
  3. AHG

    AHG Karting

    Jul 10, 2004
    234
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Andrew
    I will endeavour to raise all your points at our next VIC Committee meeting.
    Any FCA member is entitled to come and present their views which would help the full Committee understand and ask questions.
    The next meeting will be at 6pm, 23rd March at Collingwood.
    You would need to ask Chris Stephen to be included in the agenda, or you can PM me and I can arrange for this to happen.
    Regards,
    Andrew
     
  4. gva

    gva Rookie

    Jul 16, 2004
    37
    Melbourne Australia
    Full Name:
    Graeme Vincent
    I agree with AHG. fixer and stephens take AHG suggestion and attend the next metting.
     
  5. stephens

    stephens F1 Rookie
    Lifetime Rossa

    Feb 13, 2004
    4,647
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Stephen S
    Graeme
    Have you got any suggestions of your own on the running of the day?
    I am happy to step up to the plate and make my views known in the appropriate forum, but surely there are more experienced members (experienced with FCA track days) who have some suggestions that they would like made known. How many non Committee members generally attend meetings anyway?
     
  6. 360C

    360C F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    I think Phil has more experience than most on track days, having seen the larger English scene as well. Regarding the length of sessions, I agree; but bear in mind that the club day is geared to road cars that have a tendancy to run out of brakes after 3-4 laps. I think this is why the timed sessions were originally limited to 2 flying laps. The Testarossa that I drove in another life used to totally DESTROY it's brakes in 3 laps of Calder for example.

    I agree with all Phil's sugestions above (particularly point 5, some examples were abysmal). From my point of view, I think the organisers don't have any personal experience with current race cars and their needs, and consequently don't understand them. Like it or not, there are growing numbers of them in the club. There has to be some consideration given to them or they just won't turn up any more. Ever tried to drive through the BACK of the pits without speeding in a car that Kangaroo hops at anything less than 80kmh??
    Take away half a dozen race cars from the dwindling track day numbers & the events will be in even more economic difficulty. As Phil said, it took 6hrs to do 33 laps. You can do a Winton open practise day for less $$ and run all day long for as much track time per session as you could handle. Share transport/crew costs with a couple of other owners and it's even more economical.

    I don't really care if timed laps are dropped; but judging by the crowds of drivers around the time sheets, it would seem that most people want them?
    I would prefer longer practise sessions with passengers in the morning (at 8/10ths) and the same later in the day without passengers where you can push harder. This would require some common sense from the drivers in standard road cars.
     
  7. 360C

    360C F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    It is difficult, bordering on impossible for me to attend any meetings held at night as a result of work committments. Anyone is welcome to take my comments along to the committee meeting. Any member can attend the meetings as I understand it.
     
  8. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    I'll do it.
     
  9. RMV

    RMV F1 Veteran

    Apr 11, 2002
    7,372
    Excuse my ignorance on this topic but I am curious about one matter. Does the recording of lap times lead to any on track misbehaviour/bravado? If laps aren't timed, does this take some of the seriousness/competitiveness out of the day by taking pressure off some of the participants?
     
  10. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    this is no longer the case, as i found out with AHG a few months ago....they now group different types of cars/motor bikes into separate groups. I think AHG had 3 lots of 10 laps? maybe 4...but not like the old days, that's for sure.
     
  11. ashsimmonds

    ashsimmonds F1 World Champ

    Feb 14, 2004
    14,385
    adelaide, australia
    Full Name:
    Humble Narrator
    having no experience whatsoever, but having read bits and pieces about the trackday scene in europe it seems a lot of those organizations are getting it right and have been for quite a while. might be worthwhile casting the net wider for opinions on how to structure stuff.
     
  12. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    No.
    Yes.

    The real fun is free practice. Having to go as fast as you can (not that anyone's twisting your arm) is quite stressful.
     
  13. stephens

    stephens F1 Rookie
    Lifetime Rossa

    Feb 13, 2004
    4,647
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Stephen S
    The point is, that common sense and flexibility needs to be used by all concerned, both drivers and organisers.
    At Calder or Sandown you would only want 3 flying laps in a road car, but at PI 5 would be better. I definately wouldn't even bother with a club day at Calder and probably wouldn't go to Sandown either in the current format, because my car is only good for 10 laps tops including warm up and cool down laps at the tighter tracks and being restricted to one session per hour, makes the day not worthwhile. I would rather spend my money on an Events O'Neill track day, with open track, instructors, lunch etc, for less money.
     
  14. ferrarifixer

    ferrarifixer F1 Veteran
    BANNED

    Jul 22, 2003
    8,520
    Melbourne
    Full Name:
    Phil Hughes
    Graeme

    I'd gladly go to the meetings, but realistically, I just don't have the time to give away.

    Plus, Pless looks like he'll be there now, so it'll just get messy as he's argumentative for the sake of an argument... (cue predictale response).

    Anyway Graeme, can you offer your ideas here that we can bounce around....
     
  15. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    Have you even contributed anything constructive to the FCA at all? Have you asked around what people really think of you. I know MY rep..you appear to be in denial. Was that "predictale" enough for you?
     
  16. stephens

    stephens F1 Rookie
    Lifetime Rossa

    Feb 13, 2004
    4,647
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Stephen S
    Can we keep this constructive?
    It is my sincere wish that any Committe members, organisers etc do not view this thread as an attack on either their abilities, or efforts. Without them the event would never even happen. It is guys like Chris, Graeme etc that underpin the whole day. A mature respectful discussion with constructive ideas that can be taken to the Committee for further consideration should be the purpose.
     
  17. jmillard308

    jmillard308 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    May 29, 2003
    6,682
    Perth West Oz
    Full Name:
    John Millard
    These are the recently revised guidlines for FCA Rally Track Days.
    They address most of the issues mentioned here and are obviously applicable to state run track days, if the organisers elect to do so.

    Where it differs from Phil's suggestions are in his item 1 - no recognition of that, and
    Item 2 - this is opposite to Phil's idea, but the underlying reasoning was that track densities required by CAMS allow approx 20sec spacing between cars. It was felt that similar performing cars would not catch the car in front inside 4 laps.

    The minimum 3, preferably 4, laps recognises the limits of braking capacity of some models and different circumstances for different circuits.

    Fairly obviously, the numbers attending a Rally Track Day are higher than a State day, therefore the management is critical if everyone is to have their "fair share"

    These guidlines will be used during the WA Rally in October, so we'll see how they work!!!!

    Would be happy to expand on these further if you desire.

    JM

    ........................................................................................................



    Track Day

    A Track permit and insurance needs to be organized. While some tracks like Wakefield Park do have their own permit and insurance arrangements, these items are normally arranged through CAMS and, since 2004, in conjunction with the circuit owner.

    Drivers will also need to have a CAMS track licence, and the opportunity to obtain these on the day should also be made available for those who do not already have one.

    The Supplementary Regulations that apply to any FCA track day will be used for the Rally. These are a standard document and are available on the FCA website at fca.org.au. Any variation to this must be approved by the National Committee prior to the Rally and the application for an event permit. Organisers should note that CAMS is in the habit of not issuing event approvals more than a day or two prior to the date of the event.

    Officials managing the track day, i.e. Secretary of the Meeting, Clerk of Course, Stewards, Scrutineers and flag marshals, need to be CAMS accredited where the track day is operated under the aegis of CAMS.

    Lap timing should be electronic and preferably be operated by an independent third party, or failing that, a team comprising of two or more FCA members – they not all being members of the same State.

    Cars will be grouped into classes that best match the models that attend the Rally. These classes will change over time as the numbers of newer and older models change but at this time will typically be:

    V12 - Pre 365
    Post 365
    Flat 12
    V6
    V8 (308-328) Refer to current Supplementary Regulations
    V8 2+2
    355 (inc 348)
    360
    360 Challenge
    Modified V6 V8
    Modified 12
    Open Class (F40s, F50’s, 288 GTO etc.)

    NOTE: Any class with less than 3 entries should normally be combined with the next most appropriate class. Normally this will mean classing the lone vehicle type upward into a more competitive class, however the organisers might by virtue of their knowledge of the numbers, of the drivers and of the type of circuit not always follow this rule.

    An Interstate Relay is also to be held with the team for each State to be comprised of a 6cyl, early V8 (308 – 328), Late V8 (348 – 360) & 12 cyl. The absence of a particular type of vehicle from a state can be substituted by the nearest equivalent vehicle from that state. Equivalence will be determined by another state.


    The following should be noted in connection with how the teams are comprised:

    - a State that does not have a suitable type of vehicle (eg. V6, V8 etc.) may co-opt a driver and his/her vehicle from another State so long as that person/vehicle is not running for the other State. They may not co-opt another vehicle where a vehicle of that type is or ought to be available i.e. if a single slow V8 driver is all that a State has to select from, that person will be required, unless there are special circumstances, to be in the team for that State.

    Driver Training/ Practice

    Experience over the years has shown that practice session/s for most of the morning gives the maximum opportunity for drivers to enjoy themselves and while also minimising the number of incidents on track.

    Passengers

    Passengers are permitted in the non-timed part of the day on the condition that they are competitors or Rally entrants. A wristband or other suitably approved identification shall be worn by all competitors and passengers to ensure compliance with indemnity documentation. Children over 14 years of age are permitted by CAMS (in 2004) to ride with their parents as a technical matter, but this is not encouraged at a Rally.
    In the event that an event is held at a non-CAMS track under other event insurance different provisions may apply.

    Queuing/grouping

    Shuffling cars forward in long hot queues has been a particular and undesirable consequence of the larger rallies. Faster vehicles catching slower vehicles can also be a problem in the timed session as this invariably ruins the faster cars bid for a fast lap.
    To avoid these circumstances, the following procedures shall apply for practice and timed laps–
    1. Track density (no. of cars permitted on the track) shall be determined – by CAMS if applicable.
    2. Entries shall be “seeded” in groups equalling the track density required in 1. (above) by the organisers. “Seeding” shall be completed prior to the commencement of the meeting within the acceptable parameters of likely track times. Consideration shall be given to drivers who request to be in the same group as a “mate” providing there are no disparate performance issues, but in any case, shall be determined prior to the commencement of the meeting. Groups shall be coded A, B, C etc.
    3. The organisers may revise “seedings” at the conclusion of the morning session if considered necessary.
    4. Each car shall have their group code (A, B, C etc.) designated on the windscreen for ease of identification.
    5. A marshalling area near the pre-grid shall be allocated and markers (typically “witches hats”) with group codes (A, B, C etc.) shall be positioned. A “reserve” group position shall also be included.
    6. A marshal(s) shall be appointed to manage the groups from the marshalling area to the pre-grid and from the pre-grid to the track in their turn.
    7. If a driver is late for his/her group when called to the pre-grid, they will be replaced by a “reserve”. The latecomer may take a place in the “reserve” marshalling area.
    8. At the marshal’s discretion, cars in the “reserve” group with disparate performance may be refused inclusion in a particular group. (eg. It would be inappropriate to include a 360 from “reserve” with a group comprising substantially 246’s or similar)
    9. It is the drivers’ responsibility to be at the marshalling area in good time for transfer to the pre-grid. PA announcements may be made if convenient. Once a group is on the pre-grid, changes shall not be made (i.e. a latecomer to the group will not be permitted to displace a reserve)


    Timed Runs Timed runs shall be comprised of a minimum of three, preferably four hot laps with a warm up and a cool down lap. Most drivers will expect a minimum of about three or four sets of timed runs (say a total of twelve laps). Every driver must have the opportunity to complete at least three sets of hot laps – efficient management of the meeting should be focussed toward achieving this. Consideration should be given to maintaining this minimum even if the driver spins and loses much of one of his/her sets.

    Flag Marshals

    These are to be provided as per CAMS requirements with CAMS accreditation where appropriate, but in any case shall include at least one Flag Marshall for every blind crest/corner so that there is no obvious potential for a vehicle that has spun, or is stopped on the track, to be hit by the following vehicle. Where the design of a track requires marshals to be deployed, those marshals shall also have a fire extinguisher in accordance with CAMS Regulations at their disposal.
     
  18. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    Well, I didn't start it, as you can see....but we all know I'd never let a comment go by without a response.

    I've been getting nothing but negative feedback about the day, which is quite unfortunate, considering how we're stuggling for numbers and want people to return. I can only imagine that, after having such incredibly successful days last year, that there has been some sort of rule change or something that's stuffed everything up!

    PCCV has 10-12ish cars on the track at any one time. Is there any reason why the FCA can't? They do 3 timed laps, which any ferrari can do, but at PI it would have to be a pretty uncared for car that couldn't do 5 laps.

    Grouping according to speed is almost impossible.

    I have ideas, lots of them, and so do others, but the people running these days aren't idiots and, without knowing the exact rules and regs, it's very hard to offer any good suggestions, but certainly, other clubs get to equal the number of laps that everyone did on Sunday with 90 entrants, so there's something wrong.
     
  19. ferrarifixer

    ferrarifixer F1 Veteran
    BANNED

    Jul 22, 2003
    8,520
    Melbourne
    Full Name:
    Phil Hughes
    Yes, Peter, I've done a bit for FCA.

    I've written articles (but not recently), judged concours and also worked countless long hours/days/nights (yes, often unpaid, ask my wife) getting cars ready so that they can attend meetings, where I should really just say "sorry, they won't be ready in time".

    I do my bit where I can, and as for opinions.....If I cared what people thought of me I wouldn't leave the house. I fix cars as best, and as cost effectively as I can, and that seems to satisfy my ever growing customer base.

    The too many rules and regs for club track days are totally over complicated and often unnecessary.

    I'm convinced, based on experience, that no groupings is the way to go. In theory grouping is mildy convincing, but it is impossible to make reality match the theory, so just bin it and let people join a queue. It works, always has, always will.

    The number of laps should be variable based on the track. Calder and Sandown are car killers, so laps should be few, but Winton and PI are easy on cars, so a few more would be quite acceptable.

    Basically, it sems we are in search of the "common sense factor", or a mutually agreeable version of it.
     
  20. stephens

    stephens F1 Rookie
    Lifetime Rossa

    Feb 13, 2004
    4,647
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Stephen S
    Peter
    My comment was a general "lets be serious" one, not a personal attack, as much for Phil as you.
     
  21. jmillard308

    jmillard308 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    May 29, 2003
    6,682
    Perth West Oz
    Full Name:
    John Millard
    Didn't work at PI at the 1999 Rally - ask me how I know!

    Surely, if you put a inexperienced Dino driver on the track with Scott or AHG, you're creating the potential for an accident? The (current) FCA view is that "matching" performances in groups does two things -

    1. Properly spaced cars of equal(ish) performance will not hold each other up - very important for competitors!
    2. Properly spaced cars of equal(ish) performance will avoid, as far as is possible, potential for car to car contact - important for the organisers!


    I agree totally - unfortunately, common sense - not so common!
     
  22. jmillard308

    jmillard308 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    May 29, 2003
    6,682
    Perth West Oz
    Full Name:
    John Millard
    Pete
    The number of cars on the track is dependent on the circuit & type of event creating a maximum track density - determined by CAMS.
    Dont know what the formula is exactly, but at Wanneroo it results in a spacing of about 15-20 secs, I think.
    John
     
  23. stephens

    stephens F1 Rookie
    Lifetime Rossa

    Feb 13, 2004
    4,647
    Australia
    Full Name:
    Stephen S
    John
    Agreed totally, no groups works fine with low numbers and/or experienced drivers, but not on a busy club day. Once you have 50 plus entries, even at the island, you need to group drivers.
    A suggestion for PI based on bike experience
    2.06+ slow
    2.00-2.05 medium
    1.50-1.59 fast
    1.49 or better v. fast.
    With bikes it is usually 2.10+ slow, 1.55-2.10 medium, 1.55 or less, fast group.


    In doing this, you will find that the faster groups will also be smaller, allowing the more experienced drivers to get a better run.
     
  24. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    Is that during timing or practice or both?
     
  25. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    haha...I didn't take it personally, Stephen. Serious...ok...from....NOW
     

Share This Page