Senna's and Kubica's accidents | FerrariChat

Senna's and Kubica's accidents

Discussion in 'F1' started by tifosi12, Jul 23, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,612
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Just read an interesting article that compared the Kubica accident with Senna's. Basically they said (as did some corner workers who were at the scene in Montreal) that Kubica should have been killed at 3 different times during that accident, but was EXTREMELY lucky to get out of it basically unhurt. Based on black box data it was the most severe accident in F1 history that didn't end in a fatality, Kubica had a 75G impact when hitting the wall first time around.

    The article goes on to compare his luck with Senna's bad luck and mentions that Senna was actually "killed twice" in Imola: The suspension piece going through the visor was actually the 2nd cause of death. Before that the base of his skull was fractured by the tire slamming his head backwards into the cockpit. Not that it mattered really, but I never knew that part of the story.

    The bottom line of the story was, that Montreal needs some modifications made to the track's safety equipment (move that wall, add catch fences) and one can only hope those are made despite the lacking pressure of a fatality.
     
  2. Paul Vincent

    Paul Vincent Formula Junior

    Apr 3, 2004
    478
    Thank you very much for posting this information.
     
  3. BMW.SauberF1Team

    BMW.SauberF1Team F1 World Champ

    Dec 4, 2004
    14,432
    FL
    Good thing they use cf suspension pieces now that shatter instead of steel or aluminum rods that can pierce you like what happened to Senna.
     
  4. ScuderiaRossa

    ScuderiaRossa Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Mar 22, 2001
    2,230
    I don't understand why a wall (any wall, for that matter) that distance from the track has to be concrete. With all the money/technology going into F1, I can't believe that a better impact cushioning surface or system cannot be achieved.
     
  5. Kingair33

    Kingair33 Formula Junior

    Aug 28, 2006
    941
    San Francisco, CA
    Full Name:
    Alex
    Hamilton’s flight over the gravel trap could have ended very badly had the tire barrier not been there.
     
  6. kraftwerk

    kraftwerk Two Time F1 World Champ

    May 12, 2007
    26,826
    England North West
    Full Name:
    Steve
    Bad luck played a part I am sure with senna but with advances made after that race and probably because of that race the cars and tracks became alot safer.

    And in particular I believe the HANS device definitely has played a big part in reducing injury.

    Racing is a high risk sport.

    But then so is horse riding..
     
  7. ricksb

    ricksb F1 Veteran

    Apr 12, 2005
    9,975
    Montclair Village
    Full Name:
    B. Ricks

    There is a photo somewhere out there of Senna before he was loaded into the ambulance and it was pretty apparent that the suspension that pierced his visor didn't do most of the damage. The bleeding from the nose, mouth and ears is pretty consistent with basal skull fracture injuries. There was no significant bleeding from his forehead.
     
  8. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,612
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    I have seen an x-ray of the damage that suspension did. It was fatal.

    Disclaimer: Not sure the x-ray was for real or a hoax though.
     
  9. crinoid

    crinoid F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 2, 2005
    9,955
    Full Name:
    LaCrinoid
    Can you post a link to the article?
     
  10. ricksb

    ricksb F1 Veteran

    Apr 12, 2005
    9,975
    Montclair Village
    Full Name:
    B. Ricks
    I'm certain it was real. Just looking at a photo of his helmet let you know it was bad. I left a key word out of my post though; the suspension didn't do most of the "outward" damage.

    Very tragic day for fans of F1...it was such a freak accident.
     
  11. James_Woods

    James_Woods F1 World Champ

    May 17, 2006
    12,755
    Dallas, Tx.
    Full Name:
    James K. Woods
    Indeed it was - as was, some say, Jimmie Clark and Joichim Rindt, among many others. Probably not many would have thought D. Earnhardt's crash was really so deadly just on first glance.

    I for one thought the very worst when I saw the Kubica footage during the race. And he practically walked away from it.
     
  12. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Feb 18, 2007
    9,768
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
    What were these 3 different times? First one might be hitting the wall, but the other two ones....?
     
  13. Far Out

    Far Out F1 Veteran

    Feb 18, 2007
    9,768
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Florian
  14. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,612
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    2nd a broken neck (HANS prevented that) and 3rd impaled by flying debris (luck).
     
  15. menoy

    menoy F1 Rookie

    Mar 12, 2005
    2,661
    PL
    Full Name:
    MRodziewicz

    Remember - it's not only F1 races that take place there. So with all the money going into racing IN GENERAL...
     
  16. tifosi12

    tifosi12 Four Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Oct 3, 2002
    49,612
    @ the wheel
    Full Name:
    Andreas
    Marek, let me ask this: The article states that the people of Poland think it was a miracle that saved Kubica. Any comments on that?
     
  17. alberto

    alberto Formula 3

    Aug 25, 2001
    2,404
    San Diego
    Full Name:
    Alberto
    It seems no one believes that the safety improvements implemented since 1994 (amy as a direct result of Senna's death) did not contribute to Kubica surviving the incident. I don't mean to dispute that he was lucky, he was. But to me some of that "luck" is the fact that the cars are built to be more safely, Hans Device, wheel/tire restraints, higher driver envelope, etc.
     
  18. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    First of all the gravel trap was the main difference between LH's (minor) accident and both of these ones.

    Second, LH was only doing ~240 km/h compared to over 300 for both the others.
    Pete
     
  19. PSk

    PSk F1 World Champ

    Nov 20, 2002
    17,673
    Tauranga, NZ
    Full Name:
    Pete
    Simply changing the angle of the wall would have made bigger differences.

    Even in Kubica's case the wall angle is unfortunate and just wrong. It should be parallel to the track on the fast side and not on the slow side (of the hairpin). This should be rectified before anyone is allowed to race there again.
    Pete
     
  20. menoy

    menoy F1 Rookie

    Mar 12, 2005
    2,661
    PL
    Full Name:
    MRodziewicz
    I guess anyone can believe what they want. Of course technology played its role here - no doubt about that. After seeing numerous replays of the crash though one can't help feeling he had some kind of luck to walk away from that practically unscathed. Now some will say it was just luck, some that it was a divine intervention.
    If I'm not mistaken you mean "miracle" as in act of God, right? I remember being linked from some forum to an article, where the Polish Church claims God saved Kubica there. Now to be honest I don't recall hearing anyone use the word "miracle" in that sense (or at least didn't put enough pressure on the godly part for it to be evident) over here - I found about all this from English boards. It would fit many foreigner's image of Poland as a country led by religion, which in some (maybe even large) extent is true but I find somewhat misportrayed in other countries. Don't know... maybe the Church here is looking for attention and tried to use the situation knowing how religious Kubica is (although I don't doubt many REALLY believe it was a miracle)? Hard to tell..
     
  21. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,476
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    some say it was the late Pope John Paul 2 who saved Kubica. it seems, Kubik did have a pic of the late Pope on his helmet? can anyone confirm this?
     
  22. menoy

    menoy F1 Rookie

    Mar 12, 2005
    2,661
    PL
    Full Name:
    MRodziewicz
    He has John Paul II written on the side of his helmet, yes. Did he save him? Who can tell without a doubt? It's only a question of whether one is reilgious or not. If someone is - they're likely to believe. If someone isn't then they probably won't.
     
  23. Remy Zero

    Remy Zero Two Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 26, 2005
    23,476
    KL, Malaysia
    Full Name:
    MC Cool Breeze
    Thanx for the confirmation, Marek. Kubik probably put the late Pope's name on his helmet either because they're from the same country, or, he's religious.

    i do know, however, Trulli is trulli religious, as he's interview with this month's F1 racing mag :)
     
  24. menoy

    menoy F1 Rookie

    Mar 12, 2005
    2,661
    PL
    Full Name:
    MRodziewicz
    ..or both ;)
     

Share This Page