For those of you unfamiliar with the history of F1, you might enjoy an article in the April issue of MotorSport, "When Ferrari were Human" subtitled "Life before Schumacher: 50 years of boom and slump" Interesting read. They present the enigma that was Enzo in interesting light... not negative (gushing on the magic that came from his leadership) but not overly positive either (questioning whether the current state of Ferrari F1 dominance could have ever occurred under Enzo's lead). Good pictures and a nice little timeline. There are books that say much more... but for those with limited time, this may be a great summarization. Thoughts? Anything in the article that you experts consider wrong, questionable, or mis-interpretable?
