355 - Silicon or Fuel line? | FerrariChat

355 Silicon or Fuel line?

Discussion in '348/355' started by huzilulu, Apr 22, 2024.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. huzilulu

    huzilulu Formula Junior

    Apr 20, 2011
    340
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Huzi Husain
    Quick question on replacing some of old hoses/lines...

    I need to replace the 8 hoses between the throttle body and the plenum (#18 on this diagram)
    Ferrari F355 M5.2 (1996+) THROTTLE HOLDERS AND CONTROLS - Ricambi America, Inc.

    As you can see here as posted by[​IMG]

    Chris-CF355 (Thanks!! Great thread to help us newbie DIYers) replaced them with a silicone line... However, some of the silicone line manufacturer have a warning to NOT use their lines with oil and/or fuel...

    Are these lines solely for idle air injection, or do they get any oil/fuel in them as well? Safe to use silicon lines?

    Thanks!
     
  2. JoeCab

    JoeCab Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    May 27, 2014
    428
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Joe C
    I think what you really want in that application is a good quality vacuum hose, not a fuel hose. These won't see much pressure but might see vacuum when the throttles are closed?

    They don't need to resist fuel or oil but rather fuel and oil vapors.

    Silicone can work as a vacuum hose but is often not sturdy enough to do so.
     
    Mike Morrissey likes this.
  3. Rifledriver

    Rifledriver Three Time F1 World Champ

    Apr 29, 2004
    37,089
    Cowboy Capitol of the World
    Full Name:
    Brian Crall
    Liquid fuel and oil or vapor fuel and oil are no different as far as rubber hose is concerned. Those hoses need to be fuel/oil tolerant. Most silicone hoses are not and many vacuum hoses are not either.
     
  4. JoeCab

    JoeCab Formula Junior
    Silver Subscribed

    May 27, 2014
    428
    Colorado
    Full Name:
    Joe C
    Yeah, I probably could have worded that better. I was trying to express that fuel hose is designed to resist bursting from high internal pressure, and vacuum hose is designed to not get sucked closed. My thinking was fuel resistant vacuum hose would be better for this application than fuel hose?

    But, also in the diameter we are talking about this may be completely academic and fuel hose would work fine?
     

Share This Page