Stop-payment on checks illegal?? | FerrariChat

Stop-payment on checks illegal??

Discussion in 'Other Off Topic Forum' started by Steve R, Dec 4, 2005.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Steve R

    Steve R F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Sep 15, 2004
    3,018
    MeSoNeedy, CA
    Full Name:
    TorQ Master
    I've heard that putting a stop-payment on a check is something you can get in trouble for...something about "treple-damages" (sp??) collectible in court? You can get your money + 3x more???

    I do not personally have any issues concerning that right at the moment, but it does happen occassionally and I've just been curious about it.

    As an example, I do some work for a customer...he's happy with the work, satisfied and writes me a check. A day later he suspects something isn't right and immediately puts a stop-payment on that check.

    My understanding is that a check is like legal-tender; it shows intent to pay and putting a stop-payment on it is for all intents & purposes illegal. His recourse would be to sue to get his money back, not putting a stop-payment on his check. The stop-payment feature is something more suited where a check is lost in the mail and another check is being re-issued.

    Just a typical off-topic issue to chew on.....
     
  2. darth550

    darth550 Six Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jul 14, 2003
    61,157
    In front of you
    Full Name:
    BCHC
    In Seattle, I hear it flies just like income tax evasion.
     
  3. El Wayne

    El Wayne F1 World Champ
    Staff Member Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Aug 1, 2002
    18,069
    San Marino, CA
    Full Name:
    L. Wayne Ausbrooks
    Bad checks are bad checks, whether due to insufficient funds or stop-payment. Here are the penalties by state:

    http://www.ckfraud.org/penalties.html

    Since you're in California:

    California civil penalties: Amount due, damages of treble the amount so owing, but in no case less than $100 or more than $500.

    California criminal penalties: Where amount is less than $200 an is first offense, up to one year in county jail.
     
  4. Steve R

    Steve R F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Sep 15, 2004
    3,018
    MeSoNeedy, CA
    Full Name:
    TorQ Master
    Thanks guys...good info, always been curious about it.
     
  5. Steve R

    Steve R F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Sep 15, 2004
    3,018
    MeSoNeedy, CA
    Full Name:
    TorQ Master
    It has come to my attention that a particular member of F-chat felt this post may have been about a friend of his. This is absolutely NOT the case.

    To be open about it, one of my customers placed a stop-payment on a check they sent me. They have since agreed to send me a check but to this day have not. In figuring that I'd have to sue him I was anticipating the potential to sue for more then just the amount he owed...this was my interest in knowing about treble (triple) damages. I don't actually want to take the time to go to court, but by telling him how I could collect for triple the amount, I figured it could serve as leverage to inspire him to make good on his paying me the money.

    For what it's worth, he refused to issue me a new check until I returned his old check. I put his old check in the mail and now he contends to have never received it. I've explained to him that his old check is useless anyways, but he refuses to pay me until I somehow get him his old check. I'm positive I sent it to him.

    Did I make a photo-copy of his bad check? NO...but he did sign a contact and can't argue the services were provided and done to his satisfaction. This is what comes in dealing with some people who come from the middle-east.

    Just wanted to clear-up the confusion.
     
  6. Kram

    Kram Formula Junior

    Jul 3, 2004
    867
    Park bench, Canada
    Full Name:
    Mark
    You are being worked over by a grinder. He won’t pay unless you force him to, all this stuff about needing the cheque back is B.S., he got it in the mail a week ago and threw it away. Soon he won’t take your calls.

    In all probability you will have to sue him to get your money - it all depends on how tough he is. I suggest you call other service providers and ask what his payment record is like, at the very least it will be educational, at best it will help you get your cash because someone might already have a plan. Grinders are awful, but they are also common. Some people, who seem quite nice, live with the assumption that the rest of society should be their slave labor, in fact they pride themselves on nonpayment. They are horrible, and yes, I’ve met loads.

    So, your next step is to call him and tell him that the matter is going to go to your lawyer because your business needs the money, his cheque is vital to your expansion plans, and while you would prefer not to handle it this way, because you enjoyed the job, he is leaving you with little choice. In all probability the phone conversation will be recorded from his end. He will either offer you 50% then and there or give you his lawyer’s address, depending on how mean he is.

    DON’T TAKE THE 50%!!

    You will never get it, any more than you got the last cheque. Thank him but say unless the full amount is couriered over to you in the form of a cashiers cheque or bank draft by the close of business tomorrow you have no alternative but to proceed with your normal collection procedures. (The word ‘normal’ is important.) Be polite and calm. I

    If nothing happens by the next day, then you will need a lawyer’s help. Discuss fees with the lawyer first, otherwise he can charge like mad and then help himself to part of the settlement on a ‘fair fee’ basis.

    Once he takes the case your lawyer will write a letter, referring to the contract and stating that payment has not been made with in its terms (The canceled cheque is a red herring, it is best ignored in this first letter). How things go after that depends on the grinder’s response. If he wants to pay over time have your lawyer write a one page document with payment dates that he must sign right away. That will be really easy to collect on, or sell to a collection agency. If there is no reply to your lawyer's letter, then you will have to sue him.

    Suing someone is not the end of the world. Before you get into the ring you must ask yourself a question: Are you posturing, or are you going the whole way? I would recommend posturing. In California takes about $250,000 in court fees to really sue someone, and then they can always appeal the decision and delay payment .
    It is a bucket load of money, but don’t worry, all is not lost. The grinder knows the cost of court work, and if the sum he owes you is smaller than the legal fees, he will call you and ask to settle pretty smartly. This is where the posturing comes in because you will sue him for as much as you can, knowing you will settle for cents on the dollar. How high can you go? Well, the billed amount is only the first floor. Most people tack on information that they needed the money to close on some deal that is now worth more than Enron in its prime. This is done through an affidavit. Affidavits are sworn statements, and lying on them is regarded as contempt of court, you can be fined and go to jail if you don’t tell the truth. Grinders always lie on their affidavits and never get punished, but you had best be truthful because, well, you’re the good guy, and because you will be put in jail. Think about it, there is always something you could have done with the money. There is also the damage to your business and health, but that is foggy stuff, so stick to something you can hang your hat on.

    Do not be surprised if he sues you in return. His suit will be based on lies that he knows he will never have to prove, because he intends on settling.


    Collecting money from grinders is a dirty business. I’m sorry that it has happened to you, but living in L.A. you had to meet one sooner rather than later.

    Good luck!
     
  7. SrfCity

    SrfCity F1 World Champ

    Good advice there Kram. If the amount of the check is not that great than if you press it it'll fall under small claims court. You can do it yourself. Send an attorneys letter first then take it from there. This guy is definately stringing you along.
     
  8. Steve R

    Steve R F1 Rookie
    BANNED

    Sep 15, 2004
    3,018
    MeSoNeedy, CA
    Full Name:
    TorQ Master
    Kram,

    Yes, thank you for the advice!!! I realize it takes time to write-up 2-3 paragraphs that long...so I do appreicate both your time & thoughts :)

    I'm an insulation contractor, we do about 3-8 jobs per day, usually ranging from $400 to $2,400 the average of which coming in just around $950. This particular job was about $870......which is hardly the big numbers most people expect a court-related issue to be about.

    This guy met my crew on the jobsite, showed them what to do and then wrote a check. When my guys were done he had left the job and could not inspect...which was sorta the plan since he did write a check anticipating his not being there. The next day he felt we had left an oil-stain in his driveway, forgotten to plug one of our holes and we didn't move a bed back against the wall. He acted by putting a stop-payment on the check.

    Honestly, I'm not particularly worried about this one guy, I just wanted to get the law straight & understood so that I would be able to accurately use it in the future: that was my reason for posting this thead. When I call this guy, today, I'll be sure to mention to him that I will not only be suing him for the amount he owes, but also the treble-damages that I'm entitled to: that's a motivating factor.....but not if it isn't true...which again is why I ask.

    This guy will make good on his check, if he didn't intend on paying me he wouldn't have given us a check in the first place...he'd have arranged to send one in. His having given us a check shows intent to pay.....which is not the dastardly work of a con-man.

    Again, my re-posting to this thread was moreso due to an F-chat member who thought this was a personal attack on him. And again; NOT THE CASE.
     

Share This Page