Sully was good but Gimli Glider was GREAT! | Page 2 | FerrariChat

Sully was good but Gimli Glider was GREAT!

Discussion in 'Aviation Chat' started by Nuvolari, Sep 13, 2016.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. boxerman

    boxerman F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    May 27, 2004
    19,921
    FL
    Full Name:
    Sean
    How did they get the 757 out of there.
     
  2. FERRARI-TECH

    FERRARI-TECH Formula 3

    Nov 9, 2006
    1,677
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Ferrari-tech
  3. FERRARI-TECH

    FERRARI-TECH Formula 3

    Nov 9, 2006
    1,677
    Los Angeles
    Full Name:
    Ferrari-tech


    Think it was a 767 and If my memory is correct they fixed it and flew it out ...I could be wrong about that..I know they did that with the 737 that landed on the dike/levy after loosing both engine in a storm.
     
  4. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    Read Post #8 again.

    767. 2 days later... it was sitting on a runway after all.
     
  5. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    #30 Tcar, Sep 20, 2016
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2016
  6. Nuvolari

    Nuvolari F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Sep 3, 2002
    6,665
    Toronto / SoCal
    Full Name:
    Rob C.
    I would really like someone to explain to me how you can land a 767 and drag the nose all the way along a guardrail and the ground from landing to stopped yet it be cleared and considered safe to fly away a mere 2 days later. Maybe safety was a little more easy going 35 years ago but it seems to me that the plane would have sustained some more severe damage especially to the landing gear area.
     
  7. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    It needed additional repair after it took off and flew to a repair facility, but apparently there was no structural damage,.
     
  8. PureEuroM3

    PureEuroM3 F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 31, 2006
    9,375
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Full Name:
    Thomas
    #33 PureEuroM3, Sep 20, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  9. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,018
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    First, it's doubtful that the nose was dragged all the way and that the abrasive damage didn't damage anything structural that would cause an in-flight failure. Scrapes and bruises. Probably left the gear down on the ferry flight. The contact in the nose appears to be at or near the bulkhead at the forward end of nose gear "doghouse" and it's a stout piece of structure. I can envision an external skin patch at that point just to prevent further damage from airflow. I think that I remember that the number 2 engine cowl made contact with the runway but if so, that can be a quick fix too.
     
  10. Tcar

    Tcar F1 Rookie

    Thanks Bob.

    Fill 'er up, new rubber and good to go. (I think some of the tyres blew.)

    Yes prolly a gear-down ferry flight. Cycling the gear would just be tempting fate.
     
  11. Gatorrari

    Gatorrari F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Feb 27, 2004
    16,505
    Georgia
    Full Name:
    Jim Pernikoff
    And it wouldn't surprise me if they left the aircraft unpressurized.
     
  12. Bob Parks

    Bob Parks F1 Veteran
    Consultant

    Nov 29, 2003
    8,018
    Shoreline,Washington
    Full Name:
    Robert Parks
    We did pitch and roll diagrams of the airplanes to show what and where ground contact would occur in different scenarios , ex. nose gear collapse, one main gear down, both main gear up and nose gear down, etc. So, I'm certain that there was info on hand immediately to assess damage points. The 767 is a tough airplane and this was a buff-that-out-in the morning incident , I think.
     

Share This Page