TESLA ROADSTER | FerrariChat

TESLA ROADSTER

Discussion in 'British' started by need4speed, Jul 20, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. need4speed

    need4speed Formula 3

    Nov 3, 2003
    1,616
    Pacific Palisades
  2. Tomf-1

    Tomf-1 F1 Rookie

    Jan 17, 2004
    4,528
    Leawood KS/ South FL
    Full Name:
    Thomas
    CNBC had a segment on that yesterday. The founder of Paypal is the majority investor w/ $30 million. He is also the Chairman. One of the Google's founders also has a vested interest....Looks interesting....
     
  3. Webby

    Webby F1 Veteran

    Sep 12, 2004
    6,821
    Very cool, it sure looks nice as well
     
  4. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    if the no-kidding final price is competitive, it will be a success
     
  5. Agni

    Agni Karting

    Dec 11, 2005
    106
    Chicago
    Well the problem is that an electric car will never have that sports car ROAR!

    You wont hear it comming down the road.
     
  6. Aruna

    Aruna Karting

    Jan 13, 2005
    73
    the LA area
    Full Name:
    Aruna
    But I'm sure you'll get excited from the 0-60 in four seconds while silent. ;) And imagine the handling while winding this thing through canyon roads with no sound reverberating off the walls. It's sure to be a unique experience! I've read that the price is $80k and upwards for the first hundred (Signature 100 models).
     
  7. need4speed

    need4speed Formula 3

    Nov 3, 2003
    1,616
    Pacific Palisades
    Let's not forget that the only servicing required is for brakes and tires. :)
     
  8. GT Fan

    GT Fan Formula Junior

    Jun 25, 2005
    312
    This thing is a joke! $60 million invested to put an electric motor in an Elise!

    Who's going to buy the second one after Ed Begley Jr. buys the first?
     
  9. Aruna

    Aruna Karting

    Jan 13, 2005
    73
    the LA area
    Full Name:
    Aruna
    You're kidding right? I'll stand in line. :D This is the first in a long line of vehicles that Tesla Motors hope to introduce.. I think they started off right.. Who else would pay 80k+ for a nimble sports car that never has to be filled with gas, and can be driven daily? 0-60 in 4s, 135mph top speed.. drool.
     
  10. Doody

    Doody F1 Veteran

    Nov 16, 2001
    6,099
    MA USA
    Full Name:
    Mr. Doody
    do we know yet that it is in fact "nimble"?

    all i've seen or heard is about the "about 4s" 0-60 time (presumably in a straight line, like all 0-60 times are measured). i've seen nothing re: weight which matters a ton (pun intended).

    doody.
     
  11. Dino Martini

    Dino Martini F1 Rookie

    Dec 21, 2004
    4,619
    Calgary Alberta
    Full Name:
    Martin
    Thats one of the one electric cars/green cars I would buy. Its green, but fast too. No more 0 - 60 10 seconds prius.
     
  12. Aruna

    Aruna Karting

    Jan 13, 2005
    73
    the LA area
    Full Name:
    Aruna
    Chassis and engineering are by Lotus, and it is being built in the UK. I have heard the batteries and drivetrain weight ~900 pounds, so I'd imagine that the full car weights close or less, than an Elise.

    www.teslamotors.com
     
  13. GT Fan

    GT Fan Formula Junior

    Jun 25, 2005
    312
    You think that little Toyota engine and tranny in the Elise weighs 900 pounds? Are you kidding? I bet it's under 400, probably 350.

    And the Tesla website says the batteries alone weigh 1000 pounds ( http://www.teslamotors.com/engineering/how_it_works.php ). That means this supposedly revolutionary Tesla probably weighs over 600 pounds more than an Elise. And note that they don't tell the weight of the transmission, the motor, or the whole car.

    Gee... why wouldn't they tell us what the car weighs? I wonder.......
     
  14. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    26,826
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    Why do you conclude this? Unless you are printing money in the basement, you'll be converting fossil fuel into money to pay the $100K price and a bunch of fossil fuel will be consumed just to make the thing. Claiming it has "1/10th the pollution of a normal car" is just the usual distorted wingnut propaganda that doesn't consider the whole system.

    It's just a high priced luxury item (like a F ;))

    I looked hard for the (ungiven) weight spec too.
     
  15. karmavore

    karmavore Formula 3

    Dec 29, 2002
    1,641
    Hell
    Full Name:
    Karmavore
    Anyone pooh-poohing this car is selfish and short sighted.

    Is it the ultimate sports car? No.

    Does it make a great noise? Probably not.

    Is it a big step in the right direction? Yes!

    It really boggles my mind that people can be so stubborn and so attached to their pistons. What's so great about them?

    Get with the program, old timers, and turn on the news. Oil is destroying the world. The fighting for it. The terrorism it funds. The environment it destroys.

    I'll happily give up my oil stained garage floor and the gas pump for this type of car ...but then again, I own an Esprit. ;)

    Lucas.
     
  16. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    26,826
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    I never said I was "attached to pistons". As a high-performance vehicle, I have no problem with it -- I do have a big problem with them saying that it uses less energy and makes less pollution.
     
  17. karmavore

    karmavore Formula 3

    Dec 29, 2002
    1,641
    Hell
    Full Name:
    Karmavore
    Wasn't directed solely at you.

    I'd be shocked if it generated more pollution than and ICE. It generates some polution, indirectly, but I'm sure the polution per/mile is far, far less than a gas burner.
     
  18. TheBigEasy

    TheBigEasy F1 World Champ
    Consultant

    Jun 21, 2005
    18,645
    California
    Full Name:
    Ethan Hunt
    http://www.teslamotors.com/

    I know a guy that is on the list for 1 of the first 100 @ $100k. He showed me a picture of it a few days before the launch and I am sure this will be a big hit. I know it may not be as popular with this Ferrai crowd, the sound of an engine is tough to beat.

    Also, I hear that it was the guys with Google money that funded this project... and you gotta give them credit. First they change the world on the internet, and now they are using their money to trying to improve the world and the enviorment.
     
  19. GT Fan

    GT Fan Formula Junior

    Jun 25, 2005
    312
    It is not a big step in ANY direction.

    It is a huge non-breakthrough. It is nothing more than a way-too-heavy Lotus Elise with a $50,000 electric motor and battery pack.

    Why you guys think it's "green" to haul 1000 pounds of batteries with you instead of 100 pounds of gasoline is beyond me.

    Oh, and assuming an Elise gets 25mpg, driving it 100,000 miles with $3/gallon gas would cost $12,000.

    For the math-impaired, that's a lot less than $50,000. And the Elise will be much more fun to drive.
     
  20. need4speed

    need4speed Formula 3

    Nov 3, 2003
    1,616
    Pacific Palisades
    Please educate me on where the production of this electric car versus a normal car would consume more fossil fuel. I'm just not up on how various aspects of an electric car is produced. And how they might be more "expensive" to produce.

    Where I can draw parallels are in the chassis, exterior and interior bits. Suspension, brakes and tires. But once we get into the driveline, I'm a bit vague. I don't think the transmissions would be greatly different. So it probably boils down to the electric motor versus IC motor. It seems like there's less parts to an electric motor, no? If so, it should be cheaper.

    Then there's the batteries versus fuel. What's involved with producing batteries versus the efforts needed to get fuel?

    And once produced, the electric car would only consume brakes and tires for the life of the vehicle. This versus how many oil changes and fill-ups and various other bits of the engine that need replacing periodically over the life of a normal car.

    I'm just trying to understand the whole picture.

    Thanks
     
  21. Aruna

    Aruna Karting

    Jan 13, 2005
    73
    the LA area
    Full Name:
    Aruna
    Yep, more than an Elise (2500 vs. 2000). Better acceleration for sure, but it would definitely be interesting to see how it handles compared to the Elise with 500 pounds less.

    http://www.elisetalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24162
    http://www.jalopnik.com/cars/news/mechanical-resonance-the-tesla-motors-press-intro-complete-with-governator-188590.php

    "The wheelbase is two inches longer, and it weighs a bit more than an Elise, tipping the scales at 2500 lbs in the preproduction cars we saw. They're hoping to shave an additional hundred pounds from the production version. The sills are two inches lower than its Lotus half-sibling"

    "The entire powertrain of the car only weighs 160 pounds. That includes the electric motor (to be built in Taiwan), the two-speed gearbox, built in Britain by a supplier the Teslas declined to name (umm...er, could it be...Ricardo?), and the diff."
     
  22. Aruna

    Aruna Karting

    Jan 13, 2005
    73
    the LA area
    Full Name:
    Aruna
    But, aren't fossil fuels being used to create normal cars of today already? ;) One of the advantages of EVs is that you offset the pollution creating aspect of many cars on the road to one power station, usually away from large urban centers. We don't have to have coal burning power plants, we can have solar or wind power, hydro power, nuclear power.. And the electricity used to charge most EVs happens at night, when electricity usage is at a minimum.

    I think there'll always be the thrill of turning on a Ferrari and hearing the glorious roar, but I think this car is a step in the right direction for cars for the general populace.. GMs EV1 was quite popular, and I think Tesla will definitely help EVs improve urban environments.
     
  23. need4speed

    need4speed Formula 3

    Nov 3, 2003
    1,616
    Pacific Palisades
    They say they'll be in Monterey during the Historics. I'm going to try to get a test drive. This really intrigues me. I might just pony up for one.
     
  24. GT Fan

    GT Fan Formula Junior

    Jun 25, 2005
    312
    So... the powertrain plus the fuel tank (batteries) weighs 1160 pounds.

    The Elise powertrain and full tank weighs about 500 pounds.

    Remind me again, what's "breakthrough" about this car?
     
  25. need4speed

    need4speed Formula 3

    Nov 3, 2003
    1,616
    Pacific Palisades
    Uh...maybe reduced reliance on petroleum?
     

Share This Page