The Absurdity of Consensus: Capitalist feminism and Derridaist reading

1. Foucaultist power relations and precultural narrative
If one examines capitalist feminism, one is faced with a choice: either reject Lyotardist narrative or conclude that the significance of the writer is significant form. An abundance of materialisms concerning precultural narrative exist.

"Class is used in the service of colonialist perceptions of sexual identity," says Derrida. In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a modern nationalism that includes language as a reality. If precultural narrative holds, we have to choose between Derridaist reading and the subtextual paradigm of context.

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the concept of conceptual consciousness. Thus, the primary theme of the works of Joyce is the role of the participant as artist. Any number of discourses concerning the defining characteristic, and subsequent genre, of posttextual society may be discovered.

"Consciousness is part of the futility of culture," says Bataille; however, according to Humphrey[1] , it is not so much consciousness that is part of the futility of culture, but rather the paradigm, and eventually the defining characteristic, of consciousness. However, the subject is interpolated into a capitalist feminism that includes art as a paradox. Baudrillard uses the term 'Derridaist reading' to denote the difference between sexual identity and truth.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. In a sense, Tilton[2] implies that we have to choose between precultural narrative and material theory. The main theme of Humphrey's[3] analysis of precapitalist objectivism is the role of the participant as poet.

Therefore, the closing/opening distinction intrinsic to Smith's Chasing Amy is also evident in Mallrats. Precultural narrative suggests that sexual identity, surprisingly, has intrinsic meaning, but only if Lyotard's critique of capitalist feminism is valid.

But Sartre uses the term 'Derridaist reading' to denote the fatal flaw, and thus the paradigm, of dialectic narrativity. Lacan suggests the use of precultural narrative to read sexual identity. Thus, Foucault uses the term 'Derridaist reading' to denote not, in fact, theory, but subtheory. A number of materialisms concerning precultural narrative exist.

Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a capitalist feminism that includes sexuality as a totality. The characteristic theme of the works of Smith is the rubicon, and subsequent economy, of neosemiotic society.

It could be said that Bataille promotes the use of semanticist posttextual theory to deconstruct the status quo. Foucault uses the term 'Derridaist reading' to denote a self-supporting reality.

However, if capitalist feminism holds, we have to choose between Derridaist reading and materialist deappropriation. Any number of discourses concerning the genre, and eventually the defining characteristic, of neodialectic class may be found.

In a sense, cultural situationism holds that expression is created by communication. An abundance of discourses concerning precultural narrative exist.

2. Realities of stasis
"Sexual identity is unattainable," says Derrida. It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a capitalist feminism that includes language as a paradox. Sartre suggests the use of the predialectic paradigm of consensus to analyse and attack society.

But the subject is contextualised into a capitalist feminism that includes consciousness as a whole. Lyotard promotes the use of precultural narrative to deconstruct class divisions.

Thus, any number of theories concerning the role of the artist as participant may be discovered. Baudrillard suggests the use of Derridaist reading to analyse sexual identity.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Humphrey, T. K. F. ed. (1993) Capitalist feminism in the works of Rushdie. O'Reilly & Associates
2. Tilton, S. M. (1982) Deconstructing Bataille: Derridaist reading in the works of Smith. University of North Carolina Press

3. Humphrey, N. D. O. ed. (1997) Derridaist reading and capitalist feminism. O'Reilly & Associates

 

This post was brought to you by the Post-Modern Generator, located here: http://www.elsewhere.org/cgi-bin/postmodern

Enjoy!