The Enzo reimagined.... Jim's Ferrari P 4/5 by Pininfarina | Page 101 | FerrariChat

The Enzo reimagined.... Jim's Ferrari P 4/5 by Pininfarina

Discussion in 'Special Projects & Concept Cars' started by MarkPDX, Feb 3, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. cntchds

    cntchds Formula 3

    Oct 22, 2005
    1,018
    San Jose, California
    Full Name:
    Peter Hatch
    What magazines will be represented at the unveiling or who will have articles on the car? I would suspect the normals: Car and Driver I would expect to have a fairly small article since they got the official first release. Motortrend? Road and Track? Some European magazines I'm sure as well. Just want to see which ones to look to buy in the near future.

    Peter Hatch
     
  2. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    This leads me to believe that there will be a few in a number...

    Personalized Results 1 - 10 of about 3,130,000 for ferrari P 4/5. (0.65 seconds)
     
  3. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
  4. Aircon

    Aircon Ten Time F1 World Champ
    BANNED

    Jun 23, 2003
    100,524
    Melbourne, Australia
    Full Name:
    Peter
    in that last photo it says "the technicians found they were substantially different from the original factory specs". What's that mean?
     
  5. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    This is normal. When a car moves into final production (The Enzo) minor things are changed for and sometimes on the production line. It happens with all cars for various reasons. What it meant to us was that we couldn't rely on the "Final Enzo Engineering Drawings" but had to physically disassemble and measure my Enzo to pick up the actual chassis hard points we had to work with. One thing that still amazes me is that P 4/5 is fit to an existing chassis. That took a lot of work.
     
  6. cntchds

    cntchds Formula 3

    Oct 22, 2005
    1,018
    San Jose, California
    Full Name:
    Peter Hatch
    Was any other car even considered for the base instead of the Enzo? Possibly the 599GTB or the F430...

    Peter Hatch
     
  7. AGNRDARNETW

    AGNRDARNETW Formula Junior

    May 13, 2005
    479
    Earth
    Probably not the 599, because it is front-engined. Though the F430 is mid-engined, it doesn't really have the right proportions IMHO.
     
  8. Townshend

    Townshend F1 Veteran
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Jul 20, 2005
    6,677
    Chicago
    Full Name:
    Walter
    From what I gather no car was ever considered being used aside from the Enzo, but I could be wrong.
     
  9. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
  10. cntchds

    cntchds Formula 3

    Oct 22, 2005
    1,018
    San Jose, California
    Full Name:
    Peter Hatch
    How much was the chasis modified? I know the Enzo was the most practical seeing as that was the engine you were planning on using. How much of the Enzo was recycled into the P4/5? Was it "just" the body, the radiators, and interior that were modified? If just for the engine and so forth then why not the new 599 with the new, faster transmission? Is the 599 the exact same engine from the Enzo? I understand that the P series race cars had rear engines, but if you put in the same amount of money total then a 599 could easily be made rear engined, with extensive body modifications as well as all other things that have been done along with possible extras that you couldn't fit in the budget wuth a car double the 599's base price (I read you picked up the Enzo for 650,000). I'm not in any way dissappointed that you chose to use the Enzo, it is a beautifully made machine, as is your creation, as is the 599. Just curious as to the thought process. Then again, the 599 isn't sold here yet, which would put a damper on the due date. I guess we have been through this before, but the answer I received back wasn't in depth enough to what I was hoping. I may have a lot of rereading to do.

    Peter Hatch

    You also said the Enzo pieces sold would bring back a small amount of money back, but I can't see any Ferrari Pieces going cheap. Especially since you would have spent less on the initial body. Maybe I'm just a naive fifteen year old.
     
  11. cntchds

    cntchds Formula 3

    Oct 22, 2005
    1,018
    San Jose, California
    Full Name:
    Peter Hatch
    Ok, well then it makes perfect sense they chose to use an Enzo.

    Peter Hatch
     
  12. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    This is from another thread but I thought you all might find it interesting.
    I've asked Hippo to join in.



    #34 Today, 11:14 AM
    hippo
    Formula Junior
    Not Subscribed Join Date: May 2005
    Location: KL,M'SIA
    Full Name: Andri
    Posts: 346

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Napolis
    What would you calculate Cx .338 frontal area (M2) 1.906 and 660 hp top speed to be? (weight 1200KG.) Also with 800 HP and 1000HP pls.

    Best

    "660bhp"
    alright,but i think you have to add around 85kg for driver
    as well as around 30-40kg for fluids,pads,etc.
    based on a kerb weight of around 1315kg with 561RWHP(660bhp-15%)and a Cx of 0.338 and fr. ar. of 20.516sq.ft.,you'd get a maximum of 224.9mph depending
    on gearing.

    "800bhp"
    1315kg,Cx 0.338,fr ar 20.516sq.ft with 680 RWHP(800-15%) Vmax:239.18mph

    "1000bhp"
    1315kg,Cx 0.338,fr ar 20.516sq.ft with 850 RWHP(1000-15%) Vmax:272.4mph

    why does the veyron "only" do 256.8mph?GEARing.TYRES(no manufacturer dared to make a road legal tyre capable of sustained 250+mph!!).PHYSICS(oil surge,coolant deficiencies,etc)and also it was STYLED first,then ENGINEERED.oops!still,the marvellous veyron doesnt make 1001bhp as quoted.
    it's actually 1365bhp!!!!!!!!!!




    #35 Today, 12:41 PM
    Napolis
    F1 Veteran
    Honorary Join Date: Oct 2002
    Posts: 8,583

    Thanks so much.

    Our weight includes all fluids etc as we set off on test drive. Our gearing is higher than Enzo's as we have larger tires. (Same size as Veryon but not run flat) Weight also affects tire safety and as we're lighter I think we're ok.

    It's interesting to note because of the requirement that you must be able to run at max speed for a tank of fuel that why the Veryon's tank only gives you 12 minutes at max V.

    What is the max V of the Veryon in normal mode? That's a more fair comparison as in high V mode you can't turn or touch the brakes.

    How fast would we go with 1365HP?
    __________________
    Ec KrEw mAn uP an KnO ZeN.



    #36 Today, 05:24 PM
    hippo
    Formula Junior
    Not Subscribed Join Date: May 2005
    Location: KL,M'SIA
    Full Name: Andri
    Posts: 346

    the veyron in it's current configuration of Cx 0.35 with fr ar of 22.864sq.ft.
    and 4150lbs kerb weight plus 1365bhp(1160rwhp) could theoretically do
    271.1mph.
    the veyron's "normal" Vmax is 232.6mph.(with all spoilers innactive)
    still an incredible speed!

    #37 Today, 09:27 PM
    Napolis
    F1 Veteran
    Honorary Join Date: Oct 2002
    Posts: 8,583



    Looks like we need about 340 more hp to be sure...

    :)
     
  13. cntchds

    cntchds Formula 3

    Oct 22, 2005
    1,018
    San Jose, California
    Full Name:
    Peter Hatch
    Is that rear wheel horsepower or at the flywheel?

    Peter Hatch
     
  14. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    Flywheel to go 270. (Not that I would or the tires could)
     
  15. cntchds

    cntchds Formula 3

    Oct 22, 2005
    1,018
    San Jose, California
    Full Name:
    Peter Hatch
    I don't think I'd feel safe going those speeds in any car.

    Peter Hatch
     
  16. Italteen3

    Italteen3 Formula 3

    Oct 14, 2005
    1,074
    New York
    Full Name:
    Anthony
    Planning anything?

    :)
     
  17. aw2809

    aw2809 Rookie

    May 31, 2006
    27
    UK
    Full Name:
    Andrew Wood
    While the engine topic is there, I'm just wondering what an enzo block would make with a lemans restrictor plate in place?

    Hypothetically..... seeing as you've already got the FIA cage and gas generation fire extinguisher, how close would your wonderous creation come to passing entry into GT1? What fuel tanks do you have - conventional or fuel cell?

    Most comfortable race car ever, or 270/340 bhp more and a trip to bonneville? :D
     
  18. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    :)
     
  19. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
  20. Maranello Guy

    Maranello Guy F1 Rookie

    Jun 5, 2005
    3,290
    -)
    Full Name:
    MG
    #2521 Maranello Guy, Aug 10, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  21. aw2809

    aw2809 Rookie

    May 31, 2006
    27
    UK
    Full Name:
    Andrew Wood
    Good Ol' Auto Express - Can't quite get the name right, and I kind of get the feeling that they don't really get it!

    @Napolis, I'm tending to think that you're just enjoying the tease and wouldn't race her, as something in the back of my mind is saying that homologation would surely be an issue? Also taking the precident of the MC12, you'd be so restricted that it'd be hard to make an impression?

    Don't get me wrong though, i'd love it for you to prove me wrong. Having made the pilgramage to the 24 hrs of Le Mans a number of times now, it seems to be losing a little soul with the domination of Audi and their £55m budgets. Taking nothing away from the increadible engineering achievment of engineering a diesel to win lemans, sitting in the crowd, it felt like watching a marketing exercise in full swing.

    With it's roots firmly cast from the seed of the P3 and P4, the spiritual home of the P4/5 is surely at La Sarthe, not on a salt flat chasing a VW for what is quickly becoming a meaningless marketing figure. P4/5 would be more of an enjoyment to watch coming last, than the watching the ghostly quiet Audi come first again!

    Rant over, I'll get back to my lurking!

    P.S. That said, the spykers and the Corvettes were bloody good fun this year!
     
  22. Single Serving Jack

    Nov 15, 2005
    37
    That front view is just stunning. So clean and modern, yet so reminiscent of the older cars. Once again, congratulations Mr.G :D
     
  23. Napolis

    Napolis Three Time F1 World Champ
    Honorary Owner

    Oct 23, 2002
    32,118
    Full Name:
    Jim Glickenhaus
    Please don't read anything in to this but random thoughts. I agree with much of what you say but I do have tremendous respect for Audi. That said I too miss the days when even the Prototypes looked like cars at as they raced down the Mulsanne...
     
  24. aw2809

    aw2809 Rookie

    May 31, 2006
    27
    UK
    Full Name:
    Andrew Wood
    Shame shame - maybe a racing team could be your next project :D

    On the Audi front, in no way was I bashing on their achievement, I too have tremendous respect for Audi for what they've done as the R10 is a technical masterpiece. It's just that for me it seemed like they made a statement that they were going to win lemans with a diesel, and then threw money at it until they did.. A bit like the Veyron really, again a technical masterpiece, but somehow a little lacking in soul.

    P.S. Don't get me started on the Mulsanne.... I'll start ranting about chicanes! Still a good laugh if can sneak through the woods for a look. In the dark as you approach it sounds like some wailing dinosaur!
     

Share This Page