TR-Any downside to taking off catalytic converters and ECUs? | FerrariChat

TR-Any downside to taking off catalytic converters and ECUs?

Discussion in 'Boxers/TR/M' started by LW RedTR, Jun 4, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. LW RedTR

    LW RedTR Karting

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    173
    Location:
    California
    I've had a thread running on my Slow Down light coming on for bank 1-6. I already had 7-12 replaced. The fear seems to be that the catalytic converters will overheat and burn down the car.

    What is the downside to removing the catalytic converters, and just putting them back on every other year for the visual "test only" smog? At that point, I'm guessing both ECUs could be disconnected, and there would be no more fear, and no more buzzing lights, and the car might run a bit cooler underneath.

    Any downside to doing this, other than having to put them back on to get smogged about 1 to 1 and 1/2 years out?
     
  2. WILLIAM H

    WILLIAM H Three Time F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2003
    Messages:
    35,532
    Location:
    Victory Circle
    Full Name:
    HUBBSTER
    No downside, sounds a lot better too :)
     
  3. parkerfe

    parkerfe F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2001
    Messages:
    12,887
    Location:
    Cumming, Georgia
    Full Name:
    Franklin E. Parker
    The major downside I see is that it is a CRIME to tamper with or remove emission control devices...
     
  4. MS250

    MS250 Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Messages:
    26,577
    Full Name:
    Avvocato
    FYI : Here in Toronto, Onatrio we have a smog test every two years. About 7 yrs ago i went straight with the borla exhaust no cats. runs smooth and strong. Passes the emmisions here the car is 20 yrs old 86tr this year will be the last year for the car to test. Dont worry about hurting the car, it breaths better, and you get more hp out of it......as for the environment, the hole 1,000 miles a year i do..well, maybe Nasa can find a way to save on emmissions to help the ozone better than me since everytime the shuttle goes up it pollutes more than i ever could.
     
  5. Simon^2

    Simon^2 F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2005
    Messages:
    12,313
    Location:
    At Sea Level
    NASA seems to have cut back their emissions from shuttle launches >90% in the last couple years!
     
  6. mgtr1990

    mgtr1990 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,580
    Location:
    Naples Florida
    Full Name:
    Martin Graham
    Another alternative as I did to stay legal was to add a set of Hyperflow Cats and remove the Pre-cats with my tubi the car sounds great and passes the State Inspection with no problem
     
  7. mgtr1990

    mgtr1990 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,580
    Location:
    Naples Florida
    Full Name:
    Martin Graham
    Another alternative as I did to stay legal was to add a set of Hyperflow Cats and remove the Pre-cats with my tubi the car sounds great and passes the State Inspection with no problem
     
  8. LW RedTR

    LW RedTR Karting

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2006
    Messages:
    173
    Location:
    California
    The reason behind which was to control emissions. I've been advised that there is NO difference in the emissions level without the cats on my specific car, and that in fact it can pass emissions testing (other than visual inspection for cats) WITHOUT THEM.

    It is also a CRIME in California to not put on your front license plate. Any CRIMINALS out there?

    It is also a CRIME to speed. I wonder if any FERRARI owners are CRIMINAL speeders?? What do you think?

    In any event it is academic. I have been advised that catalytic converter problems are not spontaneous, if that is what it is, but indicate that something else is going on, or alternatively that the ECU has malfunctioned, neither of which problems would indicate catalytic converter removal.
     
  9. parkerfe

    parkerfe F1 World Champ

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2001
    Messages:
    12,887
    Location:
    Cumming, Georgia
    Full Name:
    Franklin E. Parker
    But speeding and no front tag charges result in small fines...an emission control device tampering and/or removal charge can result in $50k to $100k fine, jail time and confiscation of your car...and if you are a doctor, lawyer or other licensed professional you also risk sanctions by your licensing Board/Bar if convicted which since it is a felony can cause you to lose your license... is it worth that risk for a little more sound or to save a few hundred bucks on a high performance cat?
     
  10. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2001
    Messages:
    26,825
    Location:
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    Strictly speaking this is not scientifically true. It is true that a TR running without cats has CO and HC levels that are often less than the required (loose) limits, but, whatever HC and CO a car is producing out the tailpipes without a cat, it will be reduced by a functional cat.

    I'm not a smog nazi (and would much prefer that some people would have far fewer offspring ;)), but I run with Martin's configuration, and think it's a reasonable balance between complexity and emissions.

    One minor point is that a catless TR will smell a little more hydro-carbony at idle; whereas, a cat-equipped TR will smell more neutral (if the cats are in good shape and things are as they should be).

    JMOs
     
  11. mgtr1990

    mgtr1990 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,580
    Location:
    Naples Florida
    Full Name:
    Martin Graham
    Steve what did you replace the Pre-cats with, I bought a set of Fiaorno Straight pipes which had a pre-cat piece on them and had Norwoods cut it off and make the connection to the Hyperflow/Tubi. I have to say the Tubi on its own was a little disappointing, but with this combination when you stand on it its a great sound.

    Martin
     
  12. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ Lifetime Rossa

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2001
    Messages:
    26,825
    Location:
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    I purchased the insulated pipes as shown in the TR SPC (that are used in place of the pre-cat on a CAT version TR). I have to agree with you that the pre-cats+cats+Tubi is still fairly muted (although better than the downright quiet stock silencer) and that cats+Tubi isn't too bad overall acoustically (and lets you fly under the radar when necessary ;)).
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  13. mgtr1990

    mgtr1990 Formula 3

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,580
    Location:
    Naples Florida
    Full Name:
    Martin Graham
    True, yours looks like a clean installation I will grab a picture of mine and post it this evening.
     

Share This Page