US 308 QV CAT removal - Tech advise / step-by-step needed | FerrariChat

US 308 QV CAT removal - Tech advise / step-by-step needed

Discussion in '308/328' started by Nuno Andrade, Aug 18, 2020.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    Im looking for a step by step guideline and technical advises to remove the CATs from my 1983 308 QV.
    Im just looking for technical help...I understand the Fed restrictions on removing such equipment from our cars.
    My car has a TUBI exhaust and I really wanted to be able to enjoy the proper sound of the car.
    Im looking for answers and help on things like...
    • Is this just a straight conversion...installing for example a Fabspeed Cat bypass pipe?
    • Will this affect any parameters of the car (mixture settings, etc)?
    On a nutshell, what are all the steps needed for this conversion

    Thanks
     
  2. Brian Harper

    Brian Harper F1 Rookie
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 17, 2006
    4,078
    San Jose area
    Full Name:
    Brian Harper
    The 1983 FI system is "dumb." You can remove the cat and the system doesn't know. You will have to figure out what to do with the EGR and the "Slow Down" thermocouples, but it is just nuts and bolts.

    And please don't. We had a 308 drive last weekend with a dozen cars. I couldn't stand being behind the cat-delete cars - it was obnoxiously stinky even at 100+' and 50 mph.
     
    Brian A, Nuno Andrade and BLACK HORSE like this.
  3. SDDubbya

    SDDubbya Rookie

    Aug 10, 2016
    23
    Milton, GA USA
    Full Name:
    Scott Werner
    Agree with Brian, in fact I considered installing cats on my 1985 Euro QV. I replaced a Frankenstein-exhaust installed by a PO with a Tubi last year and though I love how it sounds, it smells terrible and I now rarely drive the car.


    Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat
     
    Nuno Andrade likes this.
  4. Dr Tommy Cosgrove

    Dr Tommy Cosgrove Three Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    May 4, 2001
    36,599
    Birmingham, AL
    Full Name:
    Tommy
    Same issue with my 84. Tubi with a test pipe. Sounded great but the eye watering fumes that made it into your clothes just killed the deal.

    Fun while it lasted, though.
     
    Nuno Andrade likes this.
  5. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    Is there a way to make the car sound better? Hi performance CATs? I saw some from Fabspeed but very expensive and not sure if it will produce the desired effect...and unfortunately being an 83 model I will need 2
     
  6. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    So what is the difference between the Euro and US to have that terrible smell? I've been driving along with a couple of Euro models and never felt that intense smell
     
  7. Dr Tommy Cosgrove

    Dr Tommy Cosgrove Three Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    May 4, 2001
    36,599
    Birmingham, AL
    Full Name:
    Tommy
    What you need to probably do is dig up a pair of generic plane jane vanilla test pipes (cheap), bolt them on and see what you think.

    Hyperflow, etc brand cats are not cheap (for you times two) and you dont want to blow 2k just to test the waters.
     
    Nuno Andrade likes this.
  8. mike996

    mike996 F1 Veteran

    Jun 14, 2008
    6,912
    Full Name:
    Mike 996
    #8 mike996, Aug 19, 2020
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2020
    A properly fueled, OEM warmed-up engine should not produce a noticeable smell and certainly no eye watering. The mixture is too rich or not being efficiently lit. Cats were for emissions and, initially (back in the day) , CAUSED an objectionable rotten eggs smell from exhaust that was commonly complained about. IOW, properly tuned engines didn't produce the odor being discussed. So...fix whatever the problem is that's causing the incorrect fuel mixture.

    If the car has aftermarket "performance cams," then it may not be possible to eliminate the improper mixture at idle or low/medium RPM.

    HOWEVER, like others, I suggest you leave the Cats in place. The idea that they reduce performance WAS true 40 years ago; it's not now. If the car has the original cats, replacement may be a good idea but you can get cats from a local muffler shop that will do the job as effectively/efficiently as any of the "high performance" cats.

    John Lingenfelter - famous Chevy engine builder, did a test back in the early '00's where they had a 700+ HP motor on a dyno and installed/removed cats. The HP change was considered not really verifiable because it was within the error range of the dyno itself.
     
    Crowndog and Nuno Andrade like this.
  9. miketuason

    miketuason F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 24, 2006
    15,833
    Cerritos, CA.
    Full Name:
    Mike
    I deleted my cat on my 84 QV many years ago and I don’t smell fumes or any richness in the car weather while driving or while idling but you do smell it if you stand behind the car and that’s expected. I did however leaned out the fuel air mixture a little bit the car has been running flawlessly for since I did that.
     
  10. Dr Tommy Cosgrove

    Dr Tommy Cosgrove Three Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    May 4, 2001
    36,599
    Birmingham, AL
    Full Name:
    Tommy
    Disconnecting the O2 sensor will creates the fume issue in a big bad way.
     
  11. bill brooks

    bill brooks F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Jul 30, 2007
    6,090
    waynesburg,pa
    Full Name:
    bill brooks
    i removed my 328 cat thinking it was corrupted. i did experience the fumes like everyone else.

    i installed a straight pipe in place of the cat, but did not screw the o2 sensor into the test pipe in the port provided.

    will re-installing the o2 sensor alleviate the odor?

    since running ethanol-free fuel, the odor is more tolerable.
     
  12. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    Hi Mike, my main purpose to be honest is not to gain the 5 or 7 HP...I just want to have the car sound more close to what its should be. If there is an alternative with new CATs available that can give me that I will definitely have a look into that option to avoid any of the side effects mentioned.
    My car as far as I know is all original apart from the Tubi exhaust
     
  13. mike996

    mike996 F1 Veteran

    Jun 14, 2008
    6,912
    Full Name:
    Mike 996
    Well, cats at will reduce exhaust noise (as does a turbocharger) so a set of cats will automatically reduce the decibel level of the exhaust. So if you are looking for that maximum "raw" sound from the Tubi, cats would reduce the volume somewhat so it may not be the way to go to do what you want.
     
  14. miketuason

    miketuason F1 World Champ
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 24, 2006
    15,833
    Cerritos, CA.
    Full Name:
    Mike
  15. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    Hi Mike,

    I have the TUBI already...so if I need to spend money will be on the test pipes...to test the sound :)
    ....or looking for some hi-perf CAT that will "allow" more sound to come out
     
  16. kcabpilot

    kcabpilot Formula 3

    Apr 17, 2014
    1,614
    California SF bay area
    Full Name:
    Paul
    ‘83 doesn’t have an O2 sensor. You can make a couple of test pipes for about $30, just some 1 3/4 inch tube and four flanges. Use the original cats as a template.
     
    Nuno Andrade likes this.
  17. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    So...no O2 sensor on 83s? Interesting...never checked. So I guess it’s only temp sensors


    Sent from my iPhone using FerrariChat
     
  18. kcabpilot

    kcabpilot Formula 3

    Apr 17, 2014
    1,614
    California SF bay area
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Yes, overheat sensors only. The lambda was added to CIS in ‘84.
     
  19. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    Brian, I just sent you a pm. Do you know if the cat-delete cars were 83s? If they dont have O2 sensors the issue mentioned above by you and others should not be so significant, correct?
     
  20. kcabpilot

    kcabpilot Formula 3

    Apr 17, 2014
    1,614
    California SF bay area
    Full Name:
    Paul
    I think the offending car Brian was talking about had carbs. I have an ‘83 with no cats and have not smelled any problems. Nor has anyone following me lodged any complaints.
     
    miketuason likes this.
  21. Brian Harper

    Brian Harper F1 Rookie
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Feb 17, 2006
    4,078
    San Jose area
    Full Name:
    Brian Harper
    I smelled it behind a QV also (I'm not sure who it was, it was a red one...) , but it is possible that I could smell the old carbs that far back.
    True that carbs will smell worse than K-Jet.
     
  22. kcabpilot

    kcabpilot Formula 3

    Apr 17, 2014
    1,614
    California SF bay area
    Full Name:
    Paul
    My car used to smell pretty bad on a twisty road until I replaced all of the vent line coupler hoses between the tanks. It could have been something like that. Raw fuel does stink.
     
  23. Nuno Andrade

    Nuno Andrade Karting

    Aug 24, 2019
    154
    Houston
    Full Name:
    Nuno Andrade
    @kcabpilot, what else did you do apart from installing test pipes? What were the other steps? (EGR, temp sensors, etc)
    Any side effects that needed attention ...apart from the smell?
     

Share This Page