V-8 Weber dual plenum induction | Page 2 | FerrariChat

V-8 Weber dual plenum induction

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by snj5, Apr 5, 2006.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    I had this same discussion with several raceshops. It all has to do with pulsing and velocity. As it is set up, the stock 308 box is terrible.
    As you know, each bank has evenly spaced intake pulses. If you look at how the plenum is designed in this app and the 360 plenum, the entrance side is wider than the distal side. According to racers, this setup takes advantage of air velocity and pulsing patterns and they become effective at certain rpms.. I'll dyno to be sure, and post the numbers. We'll see if there is anything to this. I can tell you above 4500 rpm the engine seems smoother than with the stock box, but that is only subjective.
    I actually enjoy this kind of engineering development and discussion, as this must be what they talked about in Ferrari engine shops as racing engines were developed. And, it's great fun.
    thanks for the discussion.
     
  2. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways
    By all means the pulsing helps, but you've got to factor in the lag time of the distance that the air has to travel.

    And air that is headed toward a dead air zone is going to slow down as it encounters resistance. Likewise, if a carb on the right side is drawing in an intake pulse before a carb on the left side has *finished* drawing in a full gulp, then the right carb will steal some of the air that would have better been used by the left...in a dead air setup.

    You could get rid of the dead air either by opening up the left side of each plenum, or by removing the plenum and going with an air filter wrapped around each set of carb twins (side draw filter).

    Either of the above solutions should give you a more optimum air/fuel mixture, especially in the left side carbs.
     
  3. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways
    #28 No Doubt, Apr 13, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  4. No Doubt

    No Doubt Seven Time F1 World Champ

    May 21, 2005
    72,740
    Vegas+Alabama
    Full Name:
    Mr. Sideways
    #29 No Doubt, Apr 13, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  5. wildegroot

    wildegroot Formula 3
    Professional Ferrari Technician

    Nov 19, 2003
    1,522
    Frenchtown NJ
    Full Name:
    Wil de Groot
    Russ,

    Nice photoshop technique. It fooled ME!

    Not to criticize, I like your design, but if you wanted to you COULD replace the oil to air cooler with an oil to water cooler to take some advantage of the left air intake. As far as I"m concerned, the stock oil cooler is just an engine compartment heater-upper. On my GTB it was blowing at the oil tank. That makes a lot of sense. Cool the oil and then warm it up again before going back to the engine!

    On the other hand, this is how I got on my treadmill 308 project. Every mod leads to another one.

    Wil
     
  6. chrismorse

    chrismorse Formula 3

    Feb 16, 2004
    2,150
    way north california
    Full Name:
    chris morse
    Will,

    Could you give us the Mfrg part number and more details on the cooler/exchanger?? I am seriously thinking about doing this, rather than going the thermostat route.

    As a side benefit, the filter could be moved in line and a dual snout air cleaner, or dual box unit could be installed.

    thanks,
    chris
     
  7. wildegroot

    wildegroot Formula 3
    Professional Ferrari Technician

    Nov 19, 2003
    1,522
    Frenchtown NJ
    Full Name:
    Wil de Groot
    Chris,

    I'm not being a wise guy here. Didn't you receive my answer to your PM on the oil cooler subject?

    Unfortunately, I pitched the box from the (oil to water) oil cooler and have no idea where the invoice might be at this point. If you go to the Setrab web-site you'll find the phone number for Setrab ( I think they're in California). Tell them you want their largest model and you need it with AN16 oil line fittings.

    I think by "filter" you mean the OIL filter? I have my 308s filter relocated because the supercharger/intake manifold needed the space occupied by the oil filter. Unfortunately you have to MAKE a manifold to adapt oil hoses from the oil inlet and outlet on top of the engine block. You can't just buy one although if you could spare the room you could leave the OEM cast aluminum oil filter adaptor and try to adapt a commercially available block-off plate for a Chevy, Ford, Nissan, etc. I have another car with a Maserati V8 and a Nissan block-off plate fits the oil filter mount perfectly so that I can remote mount the filter (double Fram HP1).

    Wil
     
  8. chrismorse

    chrismorse Formula 3

    Feb 16, 2004
    2,150
    way north california
    Full Name:
    chris morse
    Thanks Wil,

    I cruised through the "Bulk" email inbox this morning and found your response, I will give Setrab a call and look into the block off plate possibilities.

    best,
    chris
     
  9. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    #34 snj5, May 21, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Have settled on the original air horns for now; could not get Kermits low rise to fit as well (Kermit - will need a special version).
    One of the things that is amazing is how open things are and easy to work around and inspect when compared to the original airbox. I am hoping that it will also help to increase airflow and keep the carbs cooler in the Texas heat.
    The induction sound is now a bit more hard. Have not pushed up in high rpms, but low end is still very good.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  10. thecarreaper

    thecarreaper F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2003
    18,127
    Savannah
    amazing work Russ...

    edit : by the way, what sort of numbers a in the "ok" zone for a stock 79 308 GTS with the LM-1. i have been helping a friend sort out his car, and the numbers get confusing.
     
  11. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    #36 snj5, May 21, 2006
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Michael
    Thanks
    The LM-1 numbers are widely variable depending on lots o' stuff. I can give you some of mine, remembering this is an aggregate and I am set up for different parameters than you are:
    Idle when warm - about 12 - 13
    'Trundle' cruise - 2500 - 3000rpm - 11.5 - 12.8; sometimes lower.
    This is why Weber carb's Ferraris are famous for fouling plugs around town when not opened up.

    Full throttle, dumps to 11.5 when the accell jet fires then pulls up to and holds around 13 all the way up.

    Off throttle cruise at 3500 5th geat rpm highway: 13.5

    In general, It starts to miss at about 15 - 15.5 under load. I keep mine tuned a wee bit rich. It is my experience that Ferraris like it a bit rich, and plug fouling is not as much a problem with the MSD and a sl hotter plug.

    Remember, these numbers fluctuate widely depending on load, throttle position, temp, etc. I've posted some graphs earlier - search on LM-1.

    Would be equally interested in your numbers. Perhaps we should start another thread on carb Air/Fuel ratios... I have lots of dynos and on the road graphs.

    best
    rt

    <edit>
    as an example, here is an LM-1 tracing driving around in traffic on the interstate - on throttle, off throttle, part throttle quick, wide ranging throttle movements, hills up and down - remember everytime you depress the throttle the accell jet fires. It's hard to get a true steady state due to traffic, but you get the idea. This is an early test run with 140 mains 36mm venturi and 60 idles.
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  12. thecarreaper

    thecarreaper F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Sep 30, 2003
    18,127
    Savannah
    excellent info !!!! Jfrazar on here owns both the car and the LM-1 i have been using, we are both still learning what its telling us. i will let him know about this thread and see if he can post our notes. all of my notes are at his house, 30 minutes away. i also noticed a mid throttle rich condition, with the car seeming to be lean a bit at idle. he is running 60 /125 /200 with individual aircleaners and Crane x700s. we are thinking the 60s are too big, which is why he is running so rich in the progression and mid range. i am set on 55 /135 / and then tweaking the air correctors between 190 -220 depending on seasonal weather and driving use. i think his lean main jet is allowing the plugs to clean up and make up for the fat idle jet. i really dont like the 60s for around town street car driving as there is little chance to clean off the plugs without getting harassed by cops :) . he does blow some carbon / rich fouling out now and then, and has a mid range pop from some of the intakes thru the carbs. we are trying to get that last few % out of the car as it runs *almost* perfect and we are shooting for *perfect* !!

    my 911 with the Motronic has been fun to learn on. i may keep the 911 awhile , but i am now on the market for a early carb 308 or euro spec Jalpa early Lambo of some sort. no 12 cylinders for me yet... cant justify the expense!


    i would love to join you in a seperate thread on a/f ratio numbers, perhaps Brian, the current owner of my old GTB will allow us to get some numbers of a points carb car with the open air cleaners, versus Joes with the later emissions cams ect. Joe has a mechanic that is a genius with old ferrari airconditioning systems, and the load the a/c places on the car noticablely changes the a/f numbers. the a/c in his 79 308 will freeze you out of the car with the mods thay have come up with. my old GTB is supposed to be getting re fitted as well, and we can post the swings in the a/f numbers.

    Michael ..... currently ferrari and carb car-less!!!!!!!!
     
  13. Artvonne

    Artvonne F1 Veteran

    Oct 29, 2004
    5,379
    NWA
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Back in the older thread on gutting the carb 308 airbox, when this dual plenum subject was first being broached, it was questioned as to what a wall down the middle (left to right, seperating the front and rear carbs) of a stock aircleaner housing would provide. I can appreciate that it would NOT be anywhere near close to what you have built for your car in any performance gain, but what would the consensus be that it would provide some benifit, considering that the airbox in question has had its sound deadening guts removed.

    Or, what of possible baffles between all four carbs, a sort of X pattern, forcing the carbs to drink from thier own part of the airbox?
     
  14. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    I think the divider down the middle of the airbox WOULD be a good option IF the filter was moved upstream of the airbox. i.e, the split airbox was ducted to a remote filter at the scoop. I am not familiar with the gt/4/b/s air scoop plumbing, but I do not think it would be that hard.

    As for the airbox split, it would also be straightforward with two pieces a thin sheet aluminum riveted or screwed to either side of the two center post mounts
     
  15. Artvonne

    Artvonne F1 Veteran

    Oct 29, 2004
    5,379
    NWA
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Russ~

    In your dyno pulls with and without the airbox, did you ever run the box without the aircleaner element? It seems, looking at the box, Ferrari was simply trying to "make it fit", and didnt concern themselves a great deal with how restrictive it was. While you are not familiar with the GT/4/B/S, I am also not familiar with a GT/4 or a Mondial. But the GTB I have is very constrained for space. The neck from the airbox goes directly into the airbox from the tube from the fender port. It may be possible to run the airbox into a pipe and fit a K&N cone filter that sits up in the pillar/flying buttress area. I could try to remove the air tube and simply allow air from the fender port to feed the space in the area of the K&N. I will go take a look, this may prove to be quite simple.
     
  16. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    Yes, of course. With a closed airbox, without a filter, the loss was about 8+ rwhp, or about 10 flywheel hp as compared with an open topped airbox.
     

Share This Page