Weber 44 DNCF Grose Valve Jet | FerrariChat

Weber 44 DNCF Grose Valve Jet

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by gcmerak, Feb 20, 2009.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    #1 gcmerak, Feb 20, 2009
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2009
    This particular valve jet has been around for years and has been used in racing applications. Production of these valves has been started. My intent is to start a discussion and generate interest in this now available jet. About two years ago a friend of mine told me about the Grose jets he had in his 44 DCNFs. He said they were worth their weight in gold. So as I went searching for them, they were no where to be found. Well, I guess so, they were out of production.

    They are now being made. Why are these jets so much better than the Weber float valve AKA needle & seat?

    What is and how does the Weber needle and seat [sometimes referred to as the carburetor float valve] compare with the Grose needle and seat [sometimes referred to as the Grose jet valve or Grose jet]?

    The Weber seat is basically a hollow brass fitting that is cylindrical in shape. It screws into the underside of the Weber 44 DCNF carburetor top cover. It directly receives the fuel flow from the fuel rail. The needle resides inside the seat. The needle is also a cylindrical solid piece of brass that on one end has a spring-loaded ball bearing and the other end has a conical tip. The needle has three ridges spaced 33 degrees apart to not only center it in the seat, but to also offer the smallest surface area of friction and allow for the greatest flow rate of fuel, these are the sliding surfaces upon which the needle slides up and down on within the seat.

    The conical end of the needle controls the rate of fuel flow into the fuel bowl. As the conical end of the needle is pushed further up into the bore of the seat, the area of the fuel inlet/opening is thereby narrowed, decreasing fuel flow. The other end rests against the float tab. The spring-loaded ball, acts as a shock absorber at the contact point of the tab. As the fuel in the bowl fills or decreases, the float will rise or fall accordingly, this in turn pushes the needle into the seat closing or opening the aperture of the bore in the seat proportionately to the fuel needs of the carburetor.

    The problem with this arrangement is that over time a ring wear pattern develops on the conical end of the needle due to repeated contact with the seat. Once this happens, the seal between the seat and needle is compromised. In time there will be an ongoing leak into the fuel bowl as well as overall carburetor performance being adversely affected.

    Enter Mr. Ansel B. Grose. Mr. Grose redesigned the needle seat arrangement. He used two ball bearings. The large ball bearing was in contact with the fuel float tab while the small ball bearing was in contact with the tapered bore of the seat. Since both bearings are constantly rotating, the mating surface of the smaller bearing never develops a wear pattern. The spherical face of the smaller bearing creates an optimal mating surface with the tapered bore of the seat. This in turn allows for consistent fuel metering, never develops a leak, allows for quicker fuel flow, and quicker fuel shut off [read improved throttle response].

    This particular Grose jet valve will fit any Weber DCNF carburetor. The seat bore is 2mm and can flow anything up to a size 200 Weber jet and possibly more. Additionally, a 6-8 psi. fuel flow is no problem for the Grose jet valve.

    These jets are on EBAy under Ferrari/Maserati.

    I hope this starts some interesting discussions.

    Ciao,
    George
     
  2. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    Correction - Weber 44 DCNF

    Ciao,
    George
     
  3. BigTex

    BigTex Seven Time F1 World Champ
    Owner Rossa Subscribed

    Dec 6, 2002
    79,368
    Houston, Texas
    Full Name:
    Bubba
    Interesting, as all of my carb rebuilds have started with "We had to they were leaking..."

    And it tends to park the car for quite awhile.......
     
  4. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    #4 snj5, Feb 20, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
    Hmmmm

    If they fit one DCNF they should fit them all as you say, as all dcnf tops are similar (between 4 screw versions). I know anything can go poopy, but I have read just yesterday about these things sticking open as well - something having to do with the initial run of these from the 70s being prone to failure. It seems these were initially designed for British cars, so that is interesting as well

    I guess they screw into where the needle valve goes - without modification I suppose, and then the float level is reset both open and closed?

    So - how much are these jewels? I could not find them on an Ebay search other than $52 for 3 for a Jaguar.

    Would be cool if they worked - I do read a lot of folks swear by them. Any other sources?
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
  5. fastradio

    fastradio F1 Rookie
    BANNED Professional Ferrari Technician

    Apr 26, 2006
    3,664
    New England
    Full Name:
    David Feinberg
    Wow..where to begin.

    This jet have been around for ages...True.
    The first applications were for British cars and back in the early 80's, we installing many hundreds of these jets because they were cheap, readily available and marginally more relaible than the junk coming from SU. When they fail, which was fairly often, the end result was massive flooding.

    Quicker fuel flow? Who cares? The carbs draws what the engine needs, if the pump and needle jet is sized correctly...and fuel flow (into the carb) is determined by the float rising and falling.

    Quicker fuel cut off? How so? Tapered needle and seats have been around for ages and work well up until the point of failure.

    Faster throttle response? There's no correlation between fslight to moderate loat level changes and throttle response, presuming the above mentioned components are sized correctly.

    The only possible real world advantage is that the Grose jet may last longer and potentially meter better, with less leakage only after many 1000's of hours of operation...In my opinion, again based on many years on installing them is that they are a solution to a problem that really doesn't exist...and border on "snake oil" promises of improved x, y and z.

    David
     
  6. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    Hi Russ,

    I know there was a production run of these jets some time ago. The quality control was of a marginal degree. This is a new production run by a friend of mine. He is obsessive on quality when it comes to his Webers. They are eighteen dollars a piece plus shipping, IIRC. BTW I have three on order.

    Yes, they screw directly into the top cover....no mods needed.

    As you know these jets were made for all sorts of carburetors. So, I am guessing it was the SUs that had all the problems in the 70s. Anyway, machining has come a long way in the last ten years alone. I'll try to find the correct site to locate them. Try googling [Jims Garage - The Grose Jet].

    All I can say is that they are easy enough to swap out and compare with the Weber needle & seat. As was told to me by another friend who runs these jets, the difference in throttle response/drivability is significantly better with the Grose. Only one way to find out.

    Ciao,
    George
     
  7. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    I know all of us are going to be interested in your first hand report about effect, as I cannot intuitively understand how they make a throttle response difference as David alluded to. I do understand the part about the ball seating and seat wear.

    There are some interesting web discussions, pro and con, on the Grose jets if one just googles 'grose jets'.

    Good luck with the installation and testing - we're all very interested in how this goes!
     
  8. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    #8 gcmerak, Feb 21, 2009
    Last edited: Feb 21, 2009
    Received my Grose valve jets today. They are very well finished, and are a direct screw in to the DCNF top cover. Such a simple and elegant design.

    Regarding past failures; those were obviously inferior knock offs made who knows where. The only way the large bearing could ever be dislodged from the seat would be with the help of a sledge hammer.

    I now can compare both the Weber and Grose side by side. The three cutouts for fuel flow in the Webers are significantly smaller than that of the 6 fuel holes in the Grose. Even more remarkable [to me anyway] is when I blow air through each jet, I get plenty of resistance from the Weber and virtually no resistance from the Grose. That must mean something in a high fuel flow demanding situation. The principle of the rotating bearings never developing a wear pattern is also most appealing. Consistent fuel metering and no leaking from the seat bore....whats to not like.

    I suppose in day to day boulevard driving, the Weber vs the Grose difference would be impercievable. However, under demanding driving conditions such as spirited mountain driving or track driving, I believe you would notice the difference quite readily.

    That's my story, and I'm sticking to it.

    Ciao,
    George
     
  9. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    PICTURES!!!!
    :) :)
     
  10. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    What exactly would you like to see, Russ?

    Ciao,
    George
     
  11. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    Picture of the jet installed, if possible. Was wondering how much the float tabs will have to be re-bent. The Jaguar ones I saw looked pretty big, and was wondering how the new tech Webers looked in the carb top.

    Test drive soon? :)


    Thanks
     
  12. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    By rough measurement it looks like the Weber needle has 9mm of travel. That seems consistent with the 48mm - 58mm float setting. The first 5 mm of movement of the needle is no fuel flow - full fuel flow. The Grose valve jet in contrast has 2 mm of movement for the full fuel flow range.

    Dimensionally, the two look the same in proportion.

    As far as the float goes, it looks as though it will keep the fuel bowl consistently full. It wil be in the 50mm - 48mm range I believe.

    I'll try to post some pictures tomorrow.

    Ciao,
    George
     
  13. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
  14. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    Great data - thanks; looking fwd to the photos and road eval.
     
  15. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    It will be a while before the road test, so don't hold your breath. One more carb to go, and then the intake manifold comes out for honing and polishing the runner interiors, followed by an exterior thermal ceramic coat.

    Ciao,
    George
     
  16. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    #16 gcmerak, Feb 24, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017
  17. snj5

    snj5 F1 World Champ

    Feb 22, 2003
    10,213
    San Antonio
    Full Name:
    Russ Turner
    Are you doing that "Extrude-hone" thing with media?
     
  18. gcmerak

    gcmerak Formula 3

    Mar 17, 2008
    1,663
    Engine Bay, Georgia
    Full Name:
    George C.
    #18 gcmerak, Feb 24, 2009
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2009
    Extrude hone is a whole new topic...in some cases it is good, in others not. I will start a thread on the manifold when I get started, in the Maserati Merak section of course. For the time being Russ, the answer is no. I will use grinding compound with a honing tool attached to a variable speed drill. I will final polish it with Mother's Metal Polish. Should feel like glass when I finish.

    Ciao,
    George
     
  19. higgy

    higgy Rookie

    Sep 20, 2008
    32
    #19 higgy, Mar 8, 2009
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2017

Share This Page