Weight saving on 360/F430 ? | FerrariChat

Weight saving on 360/F430 ?

Discussion in '360/430' started by 360trev, Mar 21, 2018.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev
    I was recently asked to comment on what is the best weight saving measures on the 360 / F430 by member
    BAD430BENZ and thought its best to make this into a sharable discussion so people can participate and hopefully everyone learn something interesting along the way...

    Firstly some background and reasoning why the 360 and F430 are grouped together. Its actually because they share a lot the same basic chassis (and thus parts), called in Ferrari speak, F131 on 360 and F131 Evo (stands for Evolution), or evolved. on the F430. Ferrari have a tradition of retaining the same chassis (evolved) for 2 generations but revising the engine and styling on the next model generation before a whole new platform is ushered in (458 in this case and then the 488 turbo shared the same platform as 458 evolved). Get it? Its the reason why so many people swapped parts on their 348's to make them look like a F355...

    Anyway, to start with, lets give you some indication of what's possible, some ballparks and some difficulties people will face when they actually weight their vehicle for the very first time.

    The first one is that the real weight of the individual cars of the same model can vary by as much as 100kg's between US spec and European specification, so the figures below can easily be much higher than expected if your car is a US variant. Blame all the extra extra crash protection, emissions kit and so forth required to be fitted. All this is even before we factor in options list parts which can dramatically alter the weight too.

    The standard (Euro) claimed 360 Modena weight from factory (kerb) was 1,390kg's (so with upto 100kg's extra possible with options a US car could be as high as 1500kg's before you add the weight of the passengers!). That's quite a lot of difference.

    The standard Challenge Stradale kerb was 1,280kg's in its best possible configuration which included lexan side windows, no stereo, alcantara, you get the picture and in real world the vast majority of cars never had such a spec (infact it was actually illegal in the us to use lexan side windows and roll bar, which even if you could you wouldn't want the side lexan since they are horrible in a road car and scratch very easily).

    The regular 360 Modena with carbon sport seats, factory sports exhaust and several other weight saving measures could shed about 50kg's over stock weight. So already you can see that a well optioned European car could be as much as 150kg's lighter than the worse'd (for weight) spec'd US car! Incredible really, not to mention that the additional heavier main cats and header cats (not fitted on euro cars) and emissions kit and engine mapping all conspired to rob US spec cars of as much as 40 hp too. So with all the extra weight and less power a stock us car with the worst options can feel night and day different from a lighter spec'd car. It reallly is so different you just wouldn't believe it until you experienced back to back the cars.

    The most extreme variant of the 360, namely the 360 N-GT, which was in effect an evolution of the 360 Challenge car, shed over 400kg's (!) vs a worst offending 360 Modena. The official KERB weight including all fluids and fuel was rated at 1,070kg. That's pretty impressive and given it ran over 470hp in final GTC spec it was a rip snorting monster, its power to weight trouncing newer generation cars quite comfortably.

    In the next post I will also reveal the differences between the kerb weight and dry weights often quoted and why they add to the confusion even more... I'll also post a spreadsheet i developed to show the differences between various weight savings and how its the equivalent of adding extra power everywhere, not just at peak power.
     
    gtwhaley, VAF84, one4torque and 8 others like this.
  2. duck.co.za

    duck.co.za Formula Junior

    Jan 9, 2007
    981
    Cape Town South Afri
    Full Name:
    Dave
    Going to be a great read , thanks
     
    360trev likes this.
  3. ksanjana

    ksanjana Karting

    Oct 28, 2014
    112
    Houston, TX
    That is awesome info!! Keep it coming!!
     
  4. Monteman

    Monteman Formula 3
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 9, 2006
    2,323
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Full Name:
    Monte
    Not to take away from the thread but I raced cars for many years and I'll never forget a line from our crew chief when the car kept coming in about 10lbs over weight. "It's a helluva lot cheaper and easier to take weight out of the driver than the car. Lay off those Lattes!"
     
  5. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,502
    Lake Villa IL
    Haha, true for many, not for all. :D
     
  6. djempire

    djempire Formula Junior

    Apr 30, 2012
    613
    Toronto
    Full Name:
    Serf
    Looking forward to it.
     
  7. Mickster

    Mickster Formula Junior

    Oct 24, 2015
    608
    Sweden
    Full Name:
    Mikael Andersson
    Love a thread like this!
     
  8. azlin75

    azlin75 Formula Junior

    Jul 16, 2017
    785
    Kansas
    Full Name:
    Shawn Hicks
    Removing the insulation from under the carpets and behind many of the interior panels would reduce weight significantly while also increasing road and wind noise and heat inside the passenger compartment. Also installing the lightest seats and changing breaks from steel to CCB reduces weight more. I have also heard of fitting lighter rims to vehicles to save on weight. Installing headers that have no precats will more then likely save a minor amount of weight and possibly increase horsepower.

    In the "old days" racers would acid dip steel bodies to significantly reduce the weight of the body and would replace body panels with fiberglass hoods, trunk lids, fenders and door panels. In the 50s and 60s racers even fitted magnesium parts and rims to more reduce weight.

    I suppose today a person could install carbon fiber parts for more weight reduction though after reading horror stories of acid dipped cars I certainly wouldn't even contemplate that. For street use maybe I'd consider most of what I described in the first paragraph of my post. But I'm not a speed demon anymore and just enjoy the ride.

    most modern exotic sports cars are already constructed pretty light and most of the items you would remove to save weight would reduce the comfort of the driver and passenger.
     
    KC360 FL likes this.
  9. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev
    Kerb Weight/Curb Weight vs Dry Weight

    Sounds like it should be an easy thing to define right? Sadly its all a bit messed up and nobody seems to agree on anything so comparing like for like is very hard unless you have a pair of weighing scales, the truth is out there but very difficult to find out without doing your own leg work!

    Manufacturer quoted kerb weights cannot be compared between one another so they are quite useless. There are also various different definitions out there such as;
    • SAE method
    • DIN method
    • European Directive method
    • Japanese method
    • Manufacturer own method
    • US (SAE) method and so on.

    So in other words we need to do our own research to get to the truth!

    It may or may not shock you to discover that 'dry weight' is actually defined as the weight of the car without ANY fluids required to actually drive the thing anywhere, so you cannot even start the engine since their is no fuel, no oil and no coolant! Sounds ridiculous right? And you'd be right in thinking therefore that dry weights are a bit of a waste of time because nobody would ever see them!

    Its why its a bit of a silly thing that Ferrari chose to describe the Challege Stradale as having 2.8kg per bhp in their glossy sales brochure. In other words deriving a bhp per kilo for a dry weight is pretty meaningless and just marketing fluff. They really should have defined what constitutes kerb weight (on top of the dry weight) and then shown the bhp per kilo from there. Also it would also reveal that in the 360 there where significant weight penalties in some regions over others which would be difficult to stomach for some enthusiasts who would rightly feel 'short changed'.

    So, how exactly do we get real world weights?

    Well the very first thing we need to do is add fluids to the car before we can drive it ;)
    • Petrol (Gas) (how much depends on the definition of kerb weight used!)
    • Engine Oil
    • Gearbox & Differential oil
    • F1 Transmission Oil (not required H-gate)
    • Steering Box Oil
    • Hydraulic Steering Oil
    • Air conditioning gas,*optional, if you want air conditioing to work you need it!
    • Engine Coolant
    • Brake Fluid
    • Window Washer Fluid: *optional, not technically required but typically brimmed by most people.
    So the first question is how much fuel is defined by 'kerb weight'?

    Very good question! Sadly one that's not so easy to answer. It depends on whom you ask and what method they are using! Ugh!

    Some define Kerb weight as with all the fluids and equipment but wrt fuel, filled 90% of the fuel tank and some 50% and some 1/3rd of a tank, go figure. This also becomes very misleading too because if a car has a very small fuel tank it makes its kerb weight look better because its a percentage full! Some people like to use the term 'tare mass', this refers to a car that is fully loaded with all necessary fluids required except its got 10 litres of fuel in the tank. This is probably the best for comparisons between cars.

    Petrol/Gasolene

    Lets start now to define weight of petrol. Even something as simple as the Gas we use is confusing to get right. Why? Well did you know its weight actually depends on the chemical composition of the gasoline itself, its specific gravity can vary between 0.71 and 0.77, and thus its weight can slightly depending on brand! Yes that’s right! The specific gravity of gasoline used for vehicles is often therefore taken as an average of the min/max range, i.e. the calculation is 0.71+0.72+0.73+0.74+0.75+0.76+0.77 / 7. Its divide by 7 since there are 7 possible gravities. So the median gravity is 0.74.

    The specific gravity of a substance is defined as the ratio of the density of that substance to the density of water at 4 degrees Celsius. Density is defined as the mass of the object per unit volume. At 4 degrees Celsius, the density of water is 1 kilogram per litre, which equates that the density of gasoline is 0.74 kilogram per litre.

    Since 1 kilogram is equal to 2.20462 pounds and 1 US gallon is equal to 3.79 litres, density of gas can be calculated to be 6.183 pounds per gallon, for example, a gallon of gasoline weighs 6.183 pounds. Taking into consideration that the specific gravity of gasoline can be anything between 0.71 and 0.77, the weight of a gallon of gasoline can also vary between 5.93 pounds and 6.43 pounds.

    Q. Did you ever expect any of this to be easy!?

    So lets assume Gas/Petrol weight per litre is 0.74 of a kilo (median gravity)
    The 360's fuel tank is 95 Litres. So adding 95 litres of fuel (brimming it) doesn't in fact add 95 kilos, its 95 * 0.74 = 70.3kgs is 100% full.

    If we look in the workshop manuals on refilling of fluids we get the following (360, F430 differs!)
    • Petrol in tank: 35.15kg (assumed half full)
    • Engine Oil: 11.5 kg
    • Gearbox & Differential: 3.5 kg
    • F1 Transmission Oil: 1.0 kg
    • Steering Box: 0.2 kg
    • Hydraulic Steering Oil: 1.8 kg
    • Aircon Gas: 1.0 kg
    • Engine Coolant: 18.4 kg
    • Brake Fluid: 1.5 kg
    • Window Washer: 3.5 kg
    In this scenario we get 77.5kg's. Call it give or take 80kg's extra weight required to go from dry to a car with all the necessary fluids, half a tank of fuel but no passengers. That's right you need to add in the weight of a typical person (whatever that may be!). It obviously varies from country to country...

    So as you can see even something like defining kerb weight is well and truly a mine field!
     
  10. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev
    We will get to this in good time!
     
  11. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev
    Q. How much gain does weight saving really yield?

    Let us first consider some basic power to weight statements which can be used to determine exactly how much 'equivalent' horsepower the weight reduction is actually worth in comparison to the original weight and power. This is an interesting topic in itself and worth any sports car owner interested in performance spending some time to properly understand. Is it even worth it often crops up and that really depends on quite a number of factors and ofcourse how seriously you take it.

    It is worth at this point also understanding that reducing weight is never cheap but it is always preferred as the first option to gaining horsepower by engine tuning. Why? Well power output of an engine has sweet spots in rev bands, unlike electric power, engine torque and power rises as a function of revs. This means at say 1,000 rpm you may have very little of your peak torque available to accelerate the car away from the line. Electric motors are very different as they have all of the torque available instantly so they accelerate very differently to regular engine. You could say reducing weight acts a bit like this because the benefits are felt everywhere, not just at various points in the rev range. Around corners, its particularly apparent in the improved agility it brings since there is less mass to overcome.

    Lets now look at some basics (i've kept it as minimal as possible I promise);

    bhp / stock_kerb_weight_kg = stock_bhp_per_kg
    bhp / (stock_kerb_weight - kilos_removed) = new_bhp_per_kg
    stock_bhp_per_kg * target_bhp_per_kg = power_achieved
    power_achieved = bhp = power_gain

    Scenario #1:
    So using these basic, let us start with the assumption that the 360 Modena is a stock US spec car with 360hp (seems to be about right based on posted results) and its kerb weight is fully loaded example at 1490kg. If you know the rolling road power and the real kerb weight (from scales) you can work these figures out easily for your own car.

    360hp / 1490kg = 0.24161 bhp per kilo (stock)
    360hp / 1390kg = 0.25899 bhp per kilo (new)
    1490kg * 0.25899 bhp per kilo target = 385.9 bhp (equivalent power)
    385.9hp - 360hp = ~25.9 bhp (equivalent gain from weight saving)


    Now lets further assume we delete the header cats, fit high flow sports cats and the optional sports exhaust along with a the ecu's from the kit (or remap) you are now achieving between ~410-420hp with little else. That's a healthy gain of ~40-50hp over real world stock (shocking isn't it!!).

    So you could say Ferrari achieved the same (on the CS) as aftermarket options like sports cats (but actually leaving them stock), they did this by fine optimisation of other areas such as the heads, pistons, air intake flow, etc. What does this mean to the picture?

    Well if the cars really do produce 420hp its around a 40-50hp real world gain, at least in Euro spec cars, not the 20hp people you would initially believe from reading the stats (the 360's never really made 400hp unless fitted with the optional sports exhaust and even then its a tad optimistic, especially us cars!). From the rolling roads results I saw in Europe I believe the CS actually produces the power claimed.

    So lets assume they are 50hp up on power (EU cars) and in best scenario 100-110kg better weight then you get;

    -110kg saving (best spec cs)
    420hp / 1390kg = 0.30215 bhp per kilo (stock)
    420hp / 1280kg = 0.32815 bhp per kilo (new)
    1390kg * 0.32815 bhp per kilo target = 456.1285 bhp (equivalent power)

    456.12hp - 420hp = ~36.1 bhp (equivalent gain from 110kgs weight saving)

    What this means is this;

    36 bhp gain from the full ticket of weight saving
    50 bhp gain (real) from the optimized engine (real 420hp vs real 360-370hp)


    So your looking at ~86 bhp gain from real world vs a heavy optioned regular modena! No wonder people could tell the difference alright.

    All of this also assumes both cars are operating at peak performance too. If they have not had the exact cam timing done (with great care and precision) and matched across both left and right banks during the belts being done you can find yourself pretty much 'way down' on power too... More on that in another post to come later..
     
    imahorse, Mickster and MCASEY like this.
  12. Ingenere

    Ingenere F1 Veteran
    Owner Silver Subscribed

    Dec 11, 2001
    6,341
    On the Limit
    Full Name:
    Dino
    You've been busy, my friend! :)
     
    gtwhaley and 360trev like this.
  13. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,502
    Lake Villa IL

    Good thread!

    I have before/after for comparison.

    95 F355. Baseline weight/rwhp/acceleration-

    3,199lbs

    327 rwhp

    12.62@114mph


    After weight reduction and cat delete-

    2,987lbs

    340 rwhp

    [email protected]
     
  14. MaranelloDave

    MaranelloDave Formula 3

    Apr 27, 2010
    2,203
    LA
    Full Name:
    Dave
    While this may be true for many folks, not all of us have a significant amount of weight that we can lose. Plus, 10 lbs is not going to make a difference either way. When we're talking about 100 kg or more, however, that can make a difference, especially at the track.
     
  15. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev

    Attached Files:

  16. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev
    Ofcourse power to weight is only one part of the story, you have weight balance (which requires lots of effort using corner weighting scales) as well as mechanical grip (plus traction), braking, steering, you get the picture... but its a useful one to show just how rapid the latest set of supercars from Ferrari are headed. The fact that the new 488 Pista has so much power means its basically as rapid as a La Ferrari! Nuts times we live in!!!
     
  17. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,502
    Lake Villa IL
    Neat charts! ^

    Did you dyno your 360? If so on what type dyno? My car was rear wheel sae #'s on a Dynojet.

    Your chart numbers are estimated crank hp?
     
  18. duck.co.za

    duck.co.za Formula Junior

    Jan 9, 2007
    981
    Cape Town South Afri
    Full Name:
    Dave
    And how heavy the newer cars have got !
     
  19. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev
    I agree its ridiculous!

    Too much crap mandated by governments such as tpms, etc.

    Just found this rather nice list of weights and cars on the web (totally UNVERIFIED) but interesting nethertheless even if just as a ballpark...

    -- Cars upto 400kg's...

    380kg - Light Car Company Rocket

    -- Cars 400kg's to 600kg's ...

    505kg - Caterham Super light 1.6 - 1997 (138 PS)
    584kg - Ariel Atom 300SC
    585kg - Fiat Panda 1.8 CV 05
    593kg - Brooke Double R
    595kg - Caterham Super Seven Roadsport 1.7 1997
    598kg - Caterham Super Seven CSR 260

    -- Cars 600kg's to 800kg's ...

    630kg - Caterham CSR 200 - 2005 (200 PS)
    675kg – Donkervoort D8 180R
    733kg – Lotus Elise 96 1.8
    760kg - Donkervoort D8 RS06
    796kg – Lotus Exige MK1

    -- Cars 800kg's to 1,000kg's ...

    907kg – Lotus Exige MK2
    921kg – Opel Speedster Turbo
    941kg – Lotus Exige 240R
    993kg – Mazda MX5 93
    996kg - Lotus Europa S

    -- Cars over 1,000kg's to 1,200kg's

    1013kg - Citroen C2 1.1 SX
    1080kg – Lotec C1000
    1120kg - Renault Clio Trophy
    1143kg – Mazda MX5 2.0 06
    1150kg – Porsche 993 GT1
    1150kg – Ruf 964 CTR Yellowbird
    1165kg – TVR Tuscan S
    1193kg – Morgan Aero 8 Series 1
    1180kg - Mini Cooper S JWC GP

    -- Cars over 1,200kg's to 1,400kg's

    1205kg – TVR Tuscan MK2
    1207kg – Porsche 996 GT3 Cup
    1207kg – Mazda MX5 2.0 RHT rodster-coupe
    1212kg – Mini Cooper S Works
    1225kg – Wiesmann MF3
    1244kg - Honda NSX-R
    1246kg – Honda Civic Type –R
    1254kg – Ferrari F40
    1262kg – McLaren F1 ---
    1268kg - Marcos TSO GT2 Sports Package
    1275kg – Honda S2000 MK1
    1277kg - Ford Focus 1.6 Sport
    1288kg – Honda S2000 MK2
    1288kg - Renault Clio Sport 197
    1290kg - Wiesmann GT MF4
    1290kg – Lotus Esprit S4 Turbo 88
    1290kg – Subaru Impreza GT Turbo 99
    1293kg – Porsche 964 Turbo S
    1310kg - Audi TT 2.0 TFSI
    1320kg – Ferrari F50
    1320kg – Mazda RX-7 93
    1320kg – Mini Cooper S Cabriolet
    1322kg - Audi 2.0 TT TFSI (Supertest vehicle)
    1324kg – Lotus Esprit 350
    1324kg – Lotus Esprit SE 300PS 95
    1344kg - Vauxhall Astra VXR
    1348kg - Opel Astra GTC
    1350kg – Ferrari 355 Berlinetta +
    1356kg – Porsche 968 Turbo S
    1362kg – Porsche 993 Carrera 2
    1363kg - Fiat Stilo 2.2
    1370kg – Porsche Boxster 99
    1371kg – Pagani Zonda F *
    1371kg – Renault Megane Trophy Sport Auto Edition
    1373kg – Porsche 996 GT3RS *
    1376kg - Opel Astra GTC OPC
    1377kg - Chrysler Crossfire 3.2
    1378kg – Mazda RX8 Manual
    1381kg – Renault Clio V6 01
    1384kg – Mitsubishi Carisma EVO IV
    1386kg – Porsche Boxster S 99
    1387kg – Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale
    1388kg – Pagani Zonda C12S 7.3
    1388kg – Honda NSX 3.2 97
    1396kg – BMW Z4 3.0 SMG
    1400kg - Pagani Zonda C12S 7.0

    -- Cars over 1,400kg's -to 1,600kg's

    1401kg – AC Schnitzer CLS E36 II
    1406kg – Ferrari Enzo **
    1408kg – BMW Z4 3.0CSi
    1410kg – BMW Z3M Roadster
    1410kg - Ascari KZ1
    1412kg – Porsche Cayman S
    1416kg – Alpina Roadster S
    1416kg - Manthey Porsche M700
    1418kg – Koenigsegg CCR
    1418kg - Cargraphic Porsche 996 GT3 RSC
    1419kg – Renault Clio V6 255
    1420kg – Porsche 996 GT3 MK2
    1420kg – Honda NSX-T 3.2 05
    1421kg – BMW M3 CSL
    1421kg – Volkswagen Golf GTi 05
    1422kg – Porsche 993 Carrera 4
    1422kg – Ruf 993 CTR Sport
    1427kg – Alfa Romeo 147 GTA
    1427kg - Mazda 3 MPS
    1430kg – Chevrolet C5 Z06
    1440kg – Porsche 997 GT3 *
    1440kg – Ferrari 348 GTB
    1442kg – Chevrolet Corvette C6 Z06
    1444kg – BMW Z4M Roadster
    1445kg – Alfa Romeo GT V6
    1445kg – Alfa Romeo 156 GTA
    1445kg – BMW Z3 M Coupe
    1448kg - Audi TT 3.2 quattro 06
    1450kg – Porsche 996 GT2 *
    1453kg – TechArt GT Street
    1453kg - Volvo C30 T5
    1452kg – Chevrolet Corvette C5 CE
    1453kg – BMW 130i M
    1454kg – Mitsubishi Carisma EVO VII
    1461kg – Audi TT 1.8T MK1
    1461kg – Porsche 997 Carrera S *
    1463kg – Porsche 996 GT2 MK2 *
    1464kg – Ferrari 360 Modena
    1466kg – Porsche 996 Carrera 4
    1466kg – BMW Z4M Coupe
    1466kg - Mistubishi EVO FQ-340
    1467kg – Porsche 996 Carrera 2
    1468kg – Chrysler Crossfire SRT-6
    1471kg – Porsche 964 Turbo
    1472kg – Ford Focus ST
    1472kg – Porsche Carrera GT
    1480kg – Mercedes-Benz SLK32 AMG
    1482kg – Gemballa 600 GTR
    1487kg – Subaru Impreza WRX STi 03
    1489kg – Audi S3 MK2
    1490kg – Lamborghini Countach 5000S
    1491kg - Startech Crossfire 6.1
    1492kg – Chevrolet Corvette C6
    1493kg – Ferrari F430 * +
    1493kg - Audi S3 MK2
    1494kg – Ferrari 348 TB
    1495kg – Alpina B3 3.3
    1505kg – Porsche 993 Turbo
    1506kg – Volkswagen R32 MK1
    1506kg – Porsche 993 Turbo S
    1506kg - Chrysler SRT-6 Cabriolet
    1506kg - Mercedes-Benz SLK55 AMG Black Series
    1510kg – Chevrolet Corvette C5 Cabriolet Manual
    1510kg – Chevrolet Corvette C6 Cabriolet Automatic
    1512kg – Ferrari 355 Spider +
    1526kg – Nissan 350Z
    1528kg - Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera * +
    1531kg – Maserati MC12
    1550kg – Gemballa GTR 750 EVO
    1555kg – Jaguar XJ220
    1557kg – AC Schnitzer V8 Topster
    1558kg – Lotec 993 Bi-Turbo
    1560kg – Mercedes-Benz C350 Manual
    1560kg - Wendland 997 Turbo
    1560kg - Citroen C5 HDI 05
    1562kg – Porsche 997 Carrera S Cabriolet *
    1565kg – 99 Callaway C12
    1565kg - Reiter Lamborghini Gallardo GT3 Strada
    1566kg – Mercedes-Benz SLK55 AMG
    1566kg - Porsche 959 Sport
    1567kg - Viper GTS 97
    1568kg - Wendland 997 Turbo
    1569kg – Porsche 996 Turbo
    1571kg – Mercedes-Benz C43 AMG
    1576kg – Lamborghini Diablo 96
    1579kg - 9ff T-2
    1580kg – Porsche 997 Turbo *
    1584kg – BMW E46 M3
    1586kg - Geiger Viper GTS
    1589kg – Audi TT 3.2 DSG 04
    1590kg – Lamborghini Diablo SV
    1591kg – Volkswagen R32 MK2
    1592kg – Audi S4 MK1
    1592kg – Brabus 5.8
    1593kg – Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG 99
    1593kg - Viper RT/10 94
    1595kg - Gemballa GT550
    1595kg - Audi R8 + *
    1599kg – Ford GT
    1599kg - Ferrari F430 Spider + *
    1600kg – Alpina B10 3.2
    1600kg – Dodge Viper SRT-10
    1600kg – Porsche 996 Turbo S

    -- Cars over 1,600kg's -to 1,800kg's

    1604kg - Speedart TTR 530
    1610kg – Jaguar X – Type V6
    1610kg - BMW 335i Coupe
    1613kg – Lamborghini Gallardo +
    1614kg – Maserati 3200GT
    1614kg - Abt VW Eos 2.0 TFSI
    1615kg - Abt VW Eos
    1616kg – Mazda 6 MPS
    1617kg - TechArt Turbo
    1620kg – Lamborghini Diablo GT
    1620kg - Lexus IS250
    1630kg – Porsche 928 GTS 5 94
    1631kg – Ferrari 512M
    1634kg – Lexus IS220
    1635kg – Brabus CV8 Sports Coupe
    1635kg – Ford Mustang 4.6 05
    1636kg – BMW E90 330i Saloon
    1636kg – Aston Martin V8 Vantage
    1640kg – Lamborghini Gallardo SE +
    1644kg – Ferrari 512 TR
    1648kg – Mercedes-Benz C32 AMG
    1651kg – Nissan 350Z Roadster
    1651kg – BMW Z8
    1652kg – Alpina Z8 Roadster
    1664kg - Nissan 300ZX 94
    1672kg – Maserati GranSport
    1675kg – Audi RS4 MK1
    1678kg – Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM
    1679kg - Roush Mustang 420RE
    1680kg – Mercedes-Benz C55 AMG
    1686kg – Maserati 4200 CC +
    1695kg – Mercedes-Benz E55 99
    1703kg – Jaguar XKR MK1
    1720kg - Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4 '91
    1721kg - Jaguar XK8 4.2 06
    1724kg – Ferrari 550 Maranello
    1726kg - BMW 650i
    1728kg – Audi RS4 MK2 *
    1733kg – Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 V6
    1747kg – Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren
    1748kg – Lamborghini Gallardo Spider +
    1749kg – Maserati GranSport Spider
    1753kg - Ferrari 599 GTB + *
    1760kg – Jaguar XJ8 05
    1761kg – BMW M6
    1771kg - Audi RS4 Avant
    1775kg – Ferrari 575M Maranello +
    1775kg - Jaguar XKR, 2007
    1778kg - Alfa Romeo Brera 3.2 JTS V6 Q4
    1780kg – Jaguar XK8 Cabriolet 06
    1790kg – Mercedes-Benz CLK DTM Cabriolet
    1796kg – Bugatti EB110
    1797kg - AC Schnitzer 6er Tension
    1788kg – Mercedes-Benz CLK63 AMG

    -- Cars over 1,800kg's -to 2,000kg's

    1805kg – Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 + *
    1805kg – Jaguar XJR 05
    1813kg – BMW 550i Auto
    1820kg – Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2
    1825kg – Cadillac XLR
    1826kg – Audi S4 MK2 Avant
    1833kg – Aston Martin DB7 GT
    1833kg – BMW E39 M5
    1835kg – Alpina B5
    1837kg – Audi A8 4.2 05
    1844kg – BMW E60 M5
    1847kg – Aston Martin DB9 Automatic
    1847kg – Aston Martin DB7 Vantage
    1852kg – Mercedes-Benz SL500 03
    1856kg – Jaguar S-Type R 03
    1885kg – Cadillac STS 4.6 05
    1881kg – Lexus GS450h
    1886kg – BMW 840 CSi
    1886kg – Aston Martin DB9 Volante Auto
    1888kg – Aston Martin V12 Vanquish
    1890kg - Chrysler 300C 5.7
    1900kg – Aston Martin Vanquish S
    1908kg – Audi RS6
    1916kg - Audi RS4 convertible
    1931kg – Lexus LS430 02
    1935kg – Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG
    1950kg – BMW 645Ci Cabriolet
    1951kg – Mercedes-Benz SL73 AMG
    1953kg – Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG
    1954kg - Citroen V6 V6
    1961kg – BMW 850CSi
    1968kg – Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG MK1
    1970kg – BMW 650Ci Cabriolet
    1988 kg - BMW M6 convertible
    1990kg – Ferrari 456 GTA
    1994kg – Chrysler 300C SRT8

    -- Cars over 2,000kg's -to 2,200kg's

    2001kg – Mercedes-Benz SL600 03
    2003kg – Audi S6 MK2
    2004kg - Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG MK2
    2049kg – Mercedes-Benz SL65 AMG
    2068kg – Audi A8 W12 05
    2080kg – BMW 750i
    2096kg - Lexus LS460

    -- Cars over 2,200kg's -to 2,400kg's

    2275kg - Dodge Ram SRT-0
    2238kg – Mercedes-Benz ML500 06
    2300kg – BMW X5 4.4 04
    2395kg – Audi Q7 4.2

    -- Cars over 2,400kg's -to 2,600kg's

    2424kg – Bentley Continental GT
    2480kg – Bentley Flying Spur
    2504kg – Porsche Cayenne Turbo

    -- Cars over 2,600kg's -to 2,800kg's

    2633kg – Range Rover Sport 4.2 SC

    -- Cars over 2,800kg's...

    3045kg – Lamborghini LM002
     
  20. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev
    Over the years had quite a few different ones, these pics are from a few years ago. I'm due to get it done again soon as I'm highly interested to see what my new perfect cam timing has done to power output, my cam timing wasn't perfect to say the least and was still making great power with all the optimisations previously done so it might even be better now than before!

    Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    RANDY6005 likes this.
  21. INTMD8

    INTMD8 F1 Veteran
    Owner

    Jun 10, 2007
    6,502
    Lake Villa IL
    Looks like a Maha? Nice! So would I be correct in guessing they estimated crank hp at the 445 you have listed?

    I'm sure fixing the cam timing could only help, especially if off bank to bank.
     
  22. CarAholic

    CarAholic Formula Junior

    May 10, 2016
    514
    Great thread, currently looking at removing all sound insulation in my F430 and potentially new seats. Looking for a more raw experience.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
  23. G. Pepper

    G. Pepper Three Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Mar 15, 2012
    33,927
    Texas/Colorado
    Full Name:
    George Pepper
    I removed about 40 pounds of aftermarket electronics from my 360. :D
     
  24. RANDY6005

    RANDY6005 Formula 3
    Silver Subscribed

    Jan 9, 2017
    2,270
    Jacksonville
    Full Name:
    RANDY
    Hey Trev I have been watching post for a good while now you have been very help full , I just knock a huge amount a weight off my 360 installed all factory lexan side glass for doors removing wind shield wiper and arms and bottle . Ferrari just made a new run on front and rear CS bumpers euro specs big help on saving weight over US cars removing all DOT even removing air bags and install factor four point harness and roll bar way to much to list Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
    Image Unavailable, Please Login
     
    BAD430BENZ, Mickster and 360trev like this.
  25. 360trev

    360trev F1 Rookie
    Project Master

    Oct 29, 2005
    4,252
    Gibraltar
    Full Name:
    360trev
    Well done Randy on an excellent looking car! These cars are all about weight savings, transforms them! Did you weigh how much you shed?

    Thanks for sharing!
     

Share This Page