Wheel rate data | FerrariChat

Wheel rate data

Discussion in 'Technical Q&A' started by luckydynes, Apr 20, 2008.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. luckydynes

    luckydynes F1 Rookie

    Jan 25, 2004
    3,931
    CA and OR
    Full Name:
    pit bull
    Anyone have any actual suspension wheel rate data (or geometry laid out) for any Ferraris? 308 or 348 would be especially interesting especially for a track car.

    I have some for a Porsche GT3 . .. 35 N/mm front and 65 N/mm rear
    "Regular 996" 29.6/41
    Sport 33/50 while I'm at it.

    Edit: Conversion factor multiply by 5.7 which gives front wheel rate on the GT3 about 200 in-# which felt really hard to me


    The "softest" of these setups still feels harder than my 308 with 375/325 front/rear springs with qa1's dialed on 9 and 5 respectively. Trying to figure out if it's shock dampening or springs that gives this solid feel on the P cars.

    Thanks,

    Sean
     
  2. TopElement

    TopElement Formula 3

    May 14, 2005
    1,540
    OC & Vegas
    Full Name:
    A Montoya
    Stiffer springs require less bump and more rebound stiffness on the dampers. The solid feel is likely from shock valving.
     
  3. luckydynes

    luckydynes F1 Rookie

    Jan 25, 2004
    3,931
    CA and OR
    Full Name:
    pit bull
    Hee hee . . . giving me more reason to order double adjustable QA1's this time but then I have to buy 4 . . . don't want to do that if they're not up to the task to begin with (had failure on single adjusties). Probably will call them tomorrow and tell them what's up but I'm sure they'll need wheel rates if I talk to someone with a clue.

    In one of the suspension mod threads there was problems and I thought the reccomendation was to increase spring and not run the shocks on such a high setting . .. probably only applies to single adjustment and the less expensive shocks.

    Someone mentioned 750# springs to me on a 348 but I can't imagine that would be required based on the wheel rates on that GT3.
     
  4. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    26,931
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    The mechanical advantage of the 308 front suspension is fairly high (because the shock is laid over at about 45 deg):

    wheel deflection/spring length change = ~1.8 (it's not perfectly constant -- "up" is about 1.7 and "down" is about 1.9 for wheel deflections on the order of ~1 in)

    so you'd need ~650 lb/in springs at the front in order to get a wheel rate of 200 lb/in:

    650/(1.8^2) = ~200 lb/in at the wheel

    At the rear, the shock is more upright so the mechanical advantage is less -- about ~1.4

    Shoot me a PM with your email address, and I'll send you some CAD layouts I did based on the drawings from the 308 WSM.
     
  5. luckydynes

    luckydynes F1 Rookie

    Jan 25, 2004
    3,931
    CA and OR
    Full Name:
    pit bull

    thanks . .. will do .. .why you ^2 the ratio . .. that would matter with velocity (2nd derivative) but not spring rate right?

    edit: the ^2 must make sense I guess 'cause just did a search and cup car GT3 spring rates are 240 N/mm in front
     
  6. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    26,931
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    Yes, the mechanical ratio gets in there twice because it affects the forces and the deflections -- i.e., a 1 lb force at the wheel requires that the spring exert a 1.8 lb force to resist it, and, if that 1 lb force at the wheel causes a 1 inch deflection at the wheel, this results in only a 1/1.8 inch deflection at the spring. So in this simple example:

    the wheel rate = 1 lb/1 inch = 1 lb/inch

    the spring rate = 1.8 lb/(1/1.8) inch = 1.8^2 lb/inch
     
  7. luckydynes

    luckydynes F1 Rookie

    Jan 25, 2004
    3,931
    CA and OR
    Full Name:
    pit bull

    that's not that obvious at first . . thanks
     
  8. Steve Magnusson

    Steve Magnusson Two Time F1 World Champ
    Lifetime Rossa

    Jan 11, 2001
    26,931
    30°30'40" N 97°35'41" W (Texas)
    Full Name:
    Steve Magnusson
    On other thing to consider Sean is that these types of wheel rate calculations are just for the suspension bits. At the very high stiffnesses that you are interested in, the tire's vertical stiffness will start to limit things so you might need to consider the tire vertical spring rate acting in series with the suspension spring rate (if your tires are significantly different than the other car's tires) -- i.e., the overall wheel rate = 1/(1/X + 1/Y) where X is the tire's vertical stiffness and Y is the suspensions' vertical stiffness.

    Seems like you're heading to having a 308 German DTM car -- a brick with hard rubber rollers for tires ;)
     
  9. luckydynes

    luckydynes F1 Rookie

    Jan 25, 2004
    3,931
    CA and OR
    Full Name:
    pit bull


    thanks for more info . .. when I installed the 375 # springs on my 308 it didn't feel as firm as my stock setup until I had turned the shocks all the way to 5 . .. my Konis had been rebuilt by Truechoice back in '97 and I think I recall them telling me they'd turn them up a few clicks for spirited drving.

    Here's some thoughts on side wall deflection/tire profile . .. my P race car is way stiff like the GT3 with 275-45-16 hoosiers on the rear . .. 245-45-16 on the front . .. same size tires on the front as on the rear of my 308. I do not like the way it drives on the street . .. but the car is insane on the track . .. I'm sure the sidewalls are super stiff as tires go and are I have a set of the same Hoosiers for the 308.

    Guess where I'm going with this is it seems like for the track the 308 would benefit from WAY WAY more spring . . . even more than the 450 . .. I was really surprised how "soft" the 375 springs felt with the shocks turned down . .. thought it would be at least like a stocker P car but it's obviously nowhere near that wheel rate.
     
  10. fatbillybob

    fatbillybob Two Time F1 World Champ
    Consultant Owner

    Aug 10, 2002
    29,213
    socal
    Have you looked at what you have? 355C run even heavier! Rob at delta vee did a post on wheel rates for 355s it is in the archives somewhere. You may be surprised at what you see. Rob setup my car and it works very nice. He was thinking the change would be a larger front sway like 2" hollow bar!!!
     
  11. luckydynes

    luckydynes F1 Rookie

    Jan 25, 2004
    3,931
    CA and OR
    Full Name:
    pit bull
    I'm messing with my 308 again . . . I got side tracked on it after a shock failure. .. I'll be going thru all this on the 348 one of these days :) . .. I've started grading for the construction of my seperate "stable" in my spare time :).

    I wasn't ^2 the leverage ratio so that's why 750# seemed so heavy . . makes sense now.
     

Share This Page