Why are we so slow? | FerrariChat

Why are we so slow?

Discussion in 'F1' started by 635CSI, Mar 17, 2019.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. 635CSI

    635CSI F1 Rookie

    Jun 26, 2013
    3,001
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Graham
    Hopefully this will be a short lived thread and rendered redundant by a Bahrain 1-2.
    On the other hand maybe not.
    So what is it? Engine? Aero? Balance? Drivers?
    Maybe we will get some insights from the press over the next few days though , after testing, my trust in their anaysis is about zero.
     
  2. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    20,527
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    I don't know.











    really!!!
     
  3. crinoid

    crinoid F1 Veteran
    Silver Subscribed

    Apr 2, 2005
    9,414
    Full Name:
    LaCrinoid
    There are rumors of set up issues and an power issue for Seb. I’m also thinking maybe when designing the car they are designing for the majority of dedicated F1 circuits and not outliers like road courses...? I think that we need to see the car on a couple of regular tracks to know more. Also I’d rather them lose the first race and win the championship than what we’ve had before which is the opposite.
     
    stavura, Makuono, Robb and 3 others like this.
  4. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    20,527
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    Maybe this is a clue. Notice the green light on the upper left hand side of the steering wheel. Lift and coast. Seb aiding in whatever issue it may be but definetly not "attacking" the corners.


    https://streamable.com/seq60
     
    stavura and crinoid like this.
  5. davebuchner

    davebuchner Formula 3

    Jun 1, 2005
    2,487
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Dave Buchner
    I am not sure about that.

    If the car was designed with a bias to out-and-out race tracks as opposed to a part-time street track - I think Ferrari would have been expecting this scenario in Melbourne. The team seemed genuinely surprised and shocked by the lack of pace
     
    showme1946, Robb and 635CSI like this.
  6. Doctor Mark

    Doctor Mark Formula Junior

    Dec 15, 2005
    870
    Georgia
    Full Name:
    Mark Gronsbell
    Mercedes is once again in a class of their own. Almost 1 minute slower than Mercedes at the end is horrible. Another season of being either first or second loser.
     
    E60 M5, william, 375+ and 1 other person like this.
  7. 635CSI

    635CSI F1 Rookie

    Jun 26, 2013
    3,001
    London UK
    Full Name:
    Graham
    375+ likes this.
  8. A348W

    A348W Formula 3

    Jun 28, 2017
    1,741
    North Wiltshire, UK
    And what about Leclerc?

    Why was he able to ride Vettel's ass at the end? Is he that good; or was Vettal not on it?
     
  9. jgonzalesm6

    jgonzalesm6 Two Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Oct 31, 2016
    20,527
    Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Full Name:
    Joe R Gonzales
    Ryan... and 635CSI like this.
  10. SimCity3

    SimCity3 F1 Rookie

    Honda seems decent. Max could be in the hunt this year.
     
  11. andrewmr

    andrewmr Formula Junior

    Jun 7, 2005
    320
    Bucks County, PA.
    Full Name:
    Michael
    Don't know why they were slow, but they left one point on the table. With almost 30 seconds to the car behind them they should have brought one of them in for new softs (assuming they were available) and set fastest lap.
     
    Nospinzone likes this.
  12. DF1

    DF1 Two Time F1 World Champ

    Lack of risk it appears or lack of willing to risk anything at all. https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/142192/ferrari-explains-keeping-leclerc-behind-vettel

    Ferrari told Charles Leclerc to stay behind Sebastian Vettel in Formula 1's season-opening Australian Grand Prix because there was "no reason" to take a risk fighting over fourth place.

    Leclerc, making his Ferrari debut, caught his four-time world champion team-mate in the closing stages of the grand prix.

    He asked if he should stay behind Vettel, who was on older tyres, and was told "yes, and back off to have some margin".

    Explaining why Vettel was struggling so much compared to Leclerc, Ferrari team principal Mattia Binotto said: "When Seb pitted, put the medium tyres on, he didn't have the grip he was expecting.

    "And he was attacked by [Max] Verstappen, having been in the position to hold his position on track.

    "So, we decided to bring the car home. He was managing the tyres to the end.

    "I think 10 laps to the end, we decided not to take any risks and hold positions, bring the cars home and score points."

    In pre-season, new team boss Binotto had made it clear Vettel would be prioritised early on in the season if the situation required it, as he is Ferrari's initial title focus.

    But Binotto said instructing their drivers to hold position in Melbourne was neither "difficult" nor a "decision" that Ferrari had to make, because it did not make sense to let them risk fighting when it was not for the win.

    "As I said, Sebastian was managing his pace because of poor grip, and bringing the car home," he added.

    "Charles did a great second stint, [but] 10 laps to go, there was no reason to take a risk today.

    "They were not fighting for the first position."

    Leclerc ended up on the grass on the exit of the first corner after being accidentally squeezed by Vettel, who he had tried to pass on the outside.

    Risk-management was also the reason Ferrari opted not to pit Leclerc, who had a massive advantage over sixth-placed Kevin Magnussen, and put him on fresh tyres to push for fastest lap.

    "I think at that stage, whenever you pit it may be a risk," said Binotto.

    "It was more important for us to bring the car home, score the points.

    "Sometimes races where you are not the best, it's still important to score points.

    "That was our choice. We will review the race and eventually the decision, but it was for that reason."

    Image Unavailable, Please Login

    Leclerc said he pushed for the bonus point for fastest lap anyway, on his existing tyres, but accepted that race winner and eventual fastest lap earner Valtteri Bottas was too fast.

    "We tried on the last lap but obviously [it] was not enough, by quite a bit," said Leclerc.

    "I don't think we wanted to take the risk to do a pitstop.

    "There are a lot of risks with a pitstop obviously and we just wanted to finish this race clean.

    "I tried myself but it was definitely not enough and by quite a big margin."
     
    sampelligrino likes this.
  13. Robb

    Robb Moderator
    Moderator Lifetime Rossa Owner

    Feb 28, 2004
    13,874
    Full Name:
    Robb
    LeClerc would have put the car in the wall going for a fastest lap toward the end of the race.

    Vettel is just done... unfortunately. He will be down in the dumps rest of the year.

    They should let LeClerc race.

    Strategists for Ferrari are still clueless and team and new boss appear to be hurting with arrivabene change - not that they were going to be better with him...

    Mercedes may be tops in f1 the last number of years but I would not desire one of their high speed cars over a Ferrari. Just no way. So I’m really not sure if anyone really cares Mercedes is winning as far as Branding goes. When will they be done and move on to their next twin turbo hatchback diesel? :D

    Robb
     
  14. classic308

    classic308 F1 Veteran

    Jan 9, 2004
    6,793
    Westchester, NY
    Full Name:
    Paul
    Max is going to win the WDC this year. No one outdevelops RB and the engine power is there and will mostly likely increase, and thus far reliability has been excellent.

    IMHO Ferrari were simply too cautious and evolved a car that was last year’s first loser, although this track is weird per Binotto. Let’s see after the first three races but I’m not feeling it thus far.
     
  15. A348W

    A348W Formula 3

    Jun 28, 2017
    1,741
    North Wiltshire, UK
    Cheers for the detail; appreciated.

    Very conservitive approach; but given the gap above vettel and behind leclerc probably sensible.

    Be interesting if leclerc takes the fight to vettel at the next race!
     
    SWB and DF1 like this.
  16. 375+

    375+ F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 28, 2005
    11,882
    Vettel knew there was no hope in gaining position so he was saving the car/engine IMO.
     
  17. P.Singhof

    P.Singhof F1 Rookie

    Apr 19, 2006
    4,810
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Full Name:
    Peter Singhof
    They stopped him way too early. Both Max and Charles pitted much later and were both faster at the end...

    Gesendet von meinem SM-G930F mit Tapatalk
     
    daytona355 likes this.
  18. TheMayor

    TheMayor Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    98,534
    Vegas baby

    Vettel was coasting the car home to save it. No point to try to catch Max.

    Blame the STUPID rules that penalize you if you try hard.
     
    daytona355, stavura and Bas like this.
  19. bcmarly

    bcmarly Karting

    Mar 6, 2004
    61
    I'm pretty sure Seb had PU problem. His car was planted and he wasn't fighting with the steering wheel. More shall be revealed.
     
    cmos likes this.
  20. maulaf

    maulaf Formula 3

    Feb 24, 2011
    1,422
    Cape Town
    Melbour
    I suppose they were aware beating any of the Merc on pace was unlikely so they had to select a daring strategy. The assumption of keeping Max behind would not be far fetched as this is not an overtaking course. Best case go up to 2nd, worst case drop down to 4th instead of maintaining 3rd.
     
    daytona355 likes this.
  21. TheMayor

    TheMayor Nine Time F1 World Champ
    Rossa Subscribed

    Feb 11, 2008
    98,534
    Vegas baby
    kandi, 375+ and william like this.
  22. jtremlett

    jtremlett F1 Rookie

    Feb 18, 2004
    4,696
    Firstly, I don't see any issue with the logic of not letting Leclerc pass or fight with Vettel. To catch Vettel he was lapping about the same pace as Hamilton and Verstappen so wouldn't have caught them. So they would either be ordering the two cars to swap positions for no net gain for the team or risking them fighting each other. So the right call for me.

    Secondly, the analysis of Barcelona testing looked correct. All the cars were pretty much where you'd expect from testing. Except for Ferrari. Mercedes were better but you can factor in some sandbagging in Barcelona, progress since then and a circuit that particularly suits them. But even so, based on testing and looking at where the other cars were, Ferrari should have been right with them or ahead, So clearly Ferrari underperformed (to say the least) compared with testing. So the question then is does the car only work at Barcelona, did they make a fundamental set up error in Melbourne or what? Time will tell but let's hope they made a setup mistake, realize what it was and don't make it again because otherwise it is going to be another very long tedious season of Mercedes walkovers.
     
    vinny84, daytona355 and MalcQV like this.
  23. 375+

    375+ F1 World Champ
    Silver Subscribed

    Dec 28, 2005
    11,882
    You nailed it man!:D:D
     
  24. Ferrari 308 GTB

    Ferrari 308 GTB F1 Veteran

    Feb 21, 2015
    7,716
    Tropical
    Vettel did not make any attempt at all to hold up Max ...so why should he try to race Leclerc who was also clearly faster?

    Leclerc should shoot first then ask questions later.
     
    kandi likes this.
  25. Igor Ound

    Igor Ound F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2012
    8,102
    The Horn
    Full Name:
    Igor Ound
    Sandbagging fooling you too I see. Who wants a winning Ferrari apart from us? And we’ll watch anyway. If Ferrari starts winning again the whole sport will implode so smart move there! ;)
     

Share This Page