One more nail in the coffin! Notice her post date! Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
The only thing good about Karen is the way she gets F-chat team all united and working together to roast her over the coals. Pathetic person - there are so many of us that love Ferraris but don't own one and don't lie about it. Very, very immature!
I kept my nose out of this thread, but DAMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN you guys are good. Image Unavailable, Please Login
The sad part? I think we're just building a better troll by tearing them down when they make a mistake. As an aside, I'm sure V1 can come back in a year and write an article in Velostrada re: redemption.
I just dont get why somebody feels like they have to lie to people they most likley will never meet about something like this. Amazing.
one more nail. Since the sticker was present on the windshield on 8/5/2004 (pic posted by her on that date and then posted again 2/25/2006) PRIOR to delivery to her, then how could they be HER work parking and SCCA Club sticker?
Karen. I'm only gonna write this once, and I want you to pay attention to it. For most of the people here, having a Ferrari and the means to get one is irrelevant. The Ash's, Darths and the Vincents and the Carbons and the Bruces and the Jims and the CMY's and the Yins and the Eriks of the world could own nothing more than a skateboard and we would love them just the same because there is a passion in who they are and what they like, not for what they have. You think that owning a Ferrari is grants you a path to endless vindication, because of the Ferrari. How bout you coming clean once and for all? I think you'd have a lot more fun as Honest Karen than Karen The Pretender. I think you could have a lot of fun as honest Karen. Just IMHO.
"...building a better troll..." LOL! But, accurate. What's really sad--and I mean this--is that B1 (or whoever it is) felt compelled to maintain this facade for so long. That's pitiful.
Ok, I’m coming clean. My Ferrari is at Andy Greene’s Sports & Vintage Racecars while I am doing some work on my garage. The photos I posted I did so to shut you guys up about proof of ownership. I knew if I told you the truth it would be unacceptable & provoke further abuse. While I did not take that “garage” shot (but it is my car), I did take the others & I do have a black interior (Nikon D70 & Canon Power Shot A75 –I can’t remember which for the interior as I have 4 digital cameras). The light area behind the seats is just that. Michael Charness can verify I bought the carbon fiber shift knob shortly after I received the car. The VIN #: ZFFXA20A3K0079863 - check it out. The Georgia license plate is clearly visible in the attached photo – Search the DMV to see it is registered to me. What now? As for "endless vindication" It's these members that alway want to start something with me & dis my other sports cars. Image Unavailable, Please Login Image Unavailable, Please Login
Venus, WHY did you not do this months ago when you asked me for the same? All the ducking and dodging made it worse. If this is true, please accept my apology. Matt
I think you just like the fight. No matter what I say you will confront me. That is ok & makes for an interesting conversation & worthy slam bam thank you mam retort. Keep it coming.
Guys just a small point about photo exploring, if the time and date is not set on the camera a random selection will appear when you explore, i have not set the time on mine, yet the photo below was taken today, if you save and explore it i bet that todays date will not be on it. Image Unavailable, Please Login
Ok, so I guess Matt apologized. Ok, all remarks are forgiven. Now, lets see if Matt can sling it as well as he can take it. Competition is good. Peace.
Yes, that is correct, although in her case the times matched up perfectly. The pictures taken in the dealership were done at 1PM and she posted on FChat at 4PM, same date, so it all made sense. What's weird is that in her "coming clean" post she stated that she didn't take the garage pictures. That doesn't make any sense. She did take them back in 2004, with a D1X camera. A D1X camera is very expensive, and not the kind of camera one has lying around at home. It's more the kind that could be borrowed by someone working in the photography field that has access to $6000+ cameras. I dunno. Why lie about something so trivial as that? It all seems so... slippery.
I understand that & see what you are saying. Nikon does that on any digital camera. What is shot is shot & has history I guess in the Nikon system. What ever. My goal is to produce an excellent photo from the original. I do that & disreguard the orriginal info in processing the photo.
Many years ago, like you, I used to take pictures of magazine photos and show them to people, then somebody told me what a complete tool that made me so I haven't done it since.