Would The US Legislative Prohibit The Importaion Of a UK/Eero F-40 Please? | FerrariChat

Would The US Legislative Prohibit The Importaion Of a UK/Eero F-40 Please?

Discussion in '288GTO/F40/F50/Enzo/LaFerrari/F80' started by 512Tea Are, Jul 26, 2007.

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

  1. 512Tea Are

    512Tea Are F1 Rookie

    Apr 22, 2004
    2,742
    Dear American Comrades,

    I am interested to learn whether the American legislation would prohibit the importation of a UK/Euro F-40, please? I naturally realise that the US F-40's are different in some respects, but would a UK car need to meet the legislataive standards set for the original US F-40?

    Thank you.

    With kind regards,

    512 Tea Are
     
  2. joe sackey

    joe sackey Five Time F1 World Champ

    May 23, 2006
    57,525
    Southern California
    Full Name:
    Joe Sackey
    I wish I knew the answer to your question. Anybody?

    Joe
    www.joesackey.com
     
  3. peter5

    peter5 Formula Junior

    Aug 13, 2005
    519
    NoVa
    I believe that is the rule on all cars that are under a certain age. The 288GTO is soon going to be allowed into the US without need for conversion IIRC.

    Peter
     
  4. writerguy

    writerguy F1 Veteran

    Sep 30, 2003
    6,786
    NewRotic
    Full Name:
    Otto
    2 people around here that would know the answer

    Tom S
    Napolis

    Jim has a better handle on the import export side of things than almost anyone I have ever talked to
     
  5. msgsobe

    msgsobe Formula 3

    Aug 10, 2006
    1,316
    Miami Beach/Aspen
    Full Name:
    Mark Gold
    Here is the answer. Since an F40 is road legal, it cannot be brought here under the 'track' exemption. hence, it must meet epa and dot rules. So it must be federalized, which includes catalysts, bumpers, lights, side impact protection, etc.

    After 25 years, the cars are EPA?DOT exempt and may be imported without any changes, once a duty of 2.5 percent is paid. So an 89 f40 is eligible in 2014. mark your calender. for more info, contact dick merritt at nhtsa in DC, he is the author of ferrari by fitzgerald and merrit, and a wonderful source of info.
     
  6. 430fan

    430fan Karting

    Nov 20, 2005
    64
    In CA they still must meet EPA, since only cars built on and before 75 are EPA exempt. They did away with the rolling year exemption.
     
  7. Chaos

    Chaos Formula 3

    Sep 29, 2004
    2,346
    Cardiff. UK
    Full Name:
    Nick.
    why is CA allowed to have different laws to the rest of the USA - arent you one country ?
     
  8. Blown Z

    Blown Z Formula Junior

    Jun 22, 2006
    719
    Sometimes it seems that CA is a country of its own within the U.S., lol!
     
  9. frefan

    frefan F1 Veteran

    Apr 21, 2004
    7,370
    You'd have to get it federalized but since you wont find the bumpers the answer will be no.
     
  10. Ferraripilot

    Ferraripilot F1 World Champ
    Owner Project Master

    May 10, 2006
    17,856
    Atlanta
    Full Name:
    John!
    In 1999, legislation relaxed the laws regarding low-production import cars to allow non-complying cars of special interest to be imported-without having to meet crash tests or any other modification. However, epa standards for emissions are still in affect. The stipulation is that they are limited to 2500 miles a year.

    here's the link:
    http://maseratinet.com/MCI/importation.asp
     
  11. Kds

    Kds F1 World Champ

    But, as the F40 was imported to the US, show and display won't work.
     
  12. BMW.SauberF1Team

    BMW.SauberF1Team F1 World Champ

    Dec 4, 2004
    14,440
    FL
    It should be noted those are federal EPA requirements. Your State laws can still require you to meet their smog requirements. i.e. California.
     
  13. RufMD

    RufMD F1 Rookie
    Owner

    Jan 31, 2004
    3,246
    USA
    Full Name:
    Jas
    Any issues with the euro fuel tanks ?
     
  14. rodsky

    rodsky Formula 3

    Mar 24, 2003
    1,601
    Los Angeles
    Every state is entitled to have their own state law. Its a Union of 50 states. Just like you pay Federal taxes, AND State taxes. Sorta like what the EU is trying to emulate - a free trade zone but Each Country (state in the US) will still have their own laws.

    California is always a little ahead of the Country as far as I am concerned - :). Its the wealthiest and most progressive state. The rest of the Country always takes a while but they eventually follow suit. For example, I think Califiornia was the first state to outlaw smoking in various areas e.g. bars, restaurants etc. The rest of the Country will eventually get there. I still get pissed off when I go to a bar in another State and I can barely breathe.

    To address your point, California is the most restrictive State when it comes to auto emmissions etc.

    Now I know some smartass will prove me wrong and there's some obscure state that has tougher emmissions - but you know what I mean :)
     
  15. Chaos

    Chaos Formula 3

    Sep 29, 2004
    2,346
    Cardiff. UK
    Full Name:
    Nick.

    this seems somewhat self defeating, it must surely cause a great deal more money to be spent in regulating and implementing than a single body.
     
  16. rodsky

    rodsky Formula 3

    Mar 24, 2003
    1,601
    Los Angeles
    Probably so = long topic. Similar to why they dont eliminate wales, scotland ireland england and make it the UK or GB, right? Not to mention Europe or the EU which is trying to emulate the US and compete economically - but wont. Look at Airbus - 2 countries and its a friggin cluster. But this is a long topic and probably a hijack of the thread.
     
  17. Chaos

    Chaos Formula 3

    Sep 29, 2004
    2,346
    Cardiff. UK
    Full Name:
    Nick.
    until recently all the uk was run from one central office - the names simply referred to differing areas.
    currently things are devolving (and theres an interesting word) however im not sure this is the right way to go.
    but even with things as they are, only smaller laws are able to be implemented by the scottish and welsh parliaments.
    eg they couldnt implement rulings over what cars are allowed and what arent as vehicle licencing is centralised.

    your right it is slightly off topic, but not that much seeing as how the thread is about vehicle legislation.
     

Share This Page