ya, I don't think the 4c is ugly at all. its nicer than some Ferraris IMO, without naming names I personally think its just really hard for a sports car in North America to be taken seriously with less than 300hp. This is Corvette country! We like thundering horsepower, not high revving track cars like the 4c, Lotus etc. HP sells cars in America. I also think Alfa don't have enough prestige or dealership presence here, so its not going to do well against a Cayman/Boxster.
Mayor we are mostly in agreement and I love your post. Hopefully it does not drive a certain segment of current newer car owners insane as happened to me on another htread when expressing similar sentiments. But then this thread is very much for those of us who feel not served by ferraris current offerings, or sales strategies which limit their more viceral cars to collector status/pardes..
I feel 4c would make a good basis for a new dino. 400 hp v6, stick or real dct (not the chrysler one), tarted up interior, etc. Sell for about $150k which is under 570, r8, nsx but above 911.
Right- thats my point- you have a pretty ideal fun car right there in the 4C and I hear its sales are dismal. I have to say I really enjoyed my test drive of the 4C. I thought the power was adequate and the car's personality felt a bit like "Scud Jr". You could also go with a Cayman- I think that's really the best value European sports car out there. It turns out the market split between normal and luxury products. Its not just cars- its just about everything. Who would have ever imagined people paying for: water, TV, radio, etc. Yet its happened. Those who have luxury brands can charge many times the going normal rate. Ferrari is really at the top of this game- for better or worse. My ideal Ferrari would either be: Vintage: a 250 series or 275 GTB alloy Modern: 458/F12 Supercar: F40 Do you know how the Miata is selling? I have no idea but it seems to me Mazda keeps it going really to fuel its "zoom zoom" image. Theres nothing wrong with that, but I don't think theres a big future there. Btw- I'm not saying you're wrong to question whether or not this is progress. But its just how I see the sports car world.
I can respect that. I think its good looking. I also submit that a sports car design is something that should generate an emotional reaction- so if you think its ugly, then its not a total failure. That would be a design to which you had no reaction.
4c looks like a mini enzo to me. Neither are good looking but both are purposeful, italian sports cars. Nothig wrong there
Something like this. I already have the 512M mtoor in box from factory. Maybe as prices becomming sane finding the shell will be possible. Image Unavailable, Please Login
Did you ever attend empire fca track days? Racing boxer can barely make one lap without a mechanical break down! Does look good though
Thats why new 512M engine, Tr tranny with newman diff carrier and essentialy a new build/rebuild. Nick Masons BBlm which is a 460 hp car laps faster than his f40, this would be quicker still because lighter, better brakes, better suspension, better tires and more power. In period BBLMs failed because of the tranny, that can be avoided now. Still a handbuilt old car, yes relaibility can be an issue, been through that with the Gt40, and so would prefer to be able to buy a new build ferrari from the factory. I were to buy a new ferrari based ona 4c, or somehting 488 lite minimal or no nanies with stick, much lighter 2800lbs and track optimised that would be ideal too. Which means ferrari needs to build it, and produce in sufficient number that one can actualy buy it, as opposed to a few collectors puttign them in grarages.
1 electric motor per wheel, 4ws, electronic active suspensions and active aero to make it the fastest car in the world or able to replicate the driving style, noise and wheelbase of every other Ferrari in hystory at will. I believe this will actually happen in about 20 years. Forgot turbine shaped wheels to extract air from under the car to create downforce. Wonder why almost nobody uses them
well if thats the case, then lets stretch the wheelbase for better ride and esthetics. Can use 4ws to get back the resulting loss of agility. Would be a 3000 lb, 500 hp beauty! I want it
In the 4c the motor is transverse, essentialy a FWD dart setup placed in the rear, as lotus does with its celica bits in the Elise. A wider v6 engine by necessity would stretch the wheelbase behind the rear bulkhead. 4ws gets back into complexity. With 500hp and lots of Tq a slightly longer wheelbase is going to be a blessing. Alternatively there is a version of the new Giulia sporting a 350hp TC 4cyl so 400hp porbably possible. However a 6 is refined in a way a 4 is not. I think I remember a thread where Jim G before he went all out to build his own chassis, had the idea of using 4c tubs and a TTv6. In any event doing something ferrari/dino with the 4c tub is a very appealing product idea and nearly all the necessary pieces exist. Basicaly what lotus did when they went to the exige v,6 a car they cant sell in usa because they didnt do the side airbags but still sells about 1k units per year I think.
That sounds pretty damn awesome. If sticking to a 300K budget (obviously current market prices), not creating my own or modify one, It'd be hard to beat a Challenge Stradale IMO. The best V8 noise ever (I take no argument), fast, beautiful, relatively analog.
360 Cs a good choice, but not a new car from the factory, Ie what car would you like to see the factory build, more or less utilizing current production pieces. Or put another way, we know most new ferraris are Gt cars for going to the resteraunt or C&C. But there are also a lot of great pieces there. Maybe the answer is as simple as a stradale produced in enough numbers to actualy be able to buy and use one. Given we are now in the 488 era my call is for something viceral off the 4c platform as above. Or a 488 lite, soemthign stripped of most superflous parts and electronics, but no need to inflate price with Cf flourish. The turbo motor has lots of Tq and a relatively lower redline so would work with a stick. My ideal then would be something built of a 488 but light through elimination down to under 2900lbs without breaking the bank with Cf and ceramic discs just for the sake of it. Manualy adjustable suspension manual steering. Basicaly you would get a slightly more civilised F40 for 300k. Even still i think the 4c route would be even better, runs no risk of dilution, and is an additional model.
for sure a hipo version of 488 is coming just like cs, scud, spec. probably sticker at $400k and sell for extra $100k on top doubt they will get 3-400 lbs of of it though. esp if dont want extensive cf. do you want manual steering in a 3200 lb car? not me even though i love it in my 2000 lb lotus. and obviously forget stick. i also dont want to eliminate the electronic driver aids. not only can they save an accident, they can also help an advanced driver work towards the limit. they weigh nothing and can be shut off with a button so whats the big deal? keep them
Stick would loose 50lbs, imo make it more enjoyable on road and while slower on track more fun, making a car a keeper as opposed to yesterdays news 5 years later. You can scrap probably 100lbs of sound deadening, and a whole lot of inetrior crap. What does PS weight, what do the electrics and wiring to make so much stuff weigh. I think there is a lot of stuff to loose weight wise, even one can loose screens complex dash, auto ac controlls. My BBi is 3500lbs and no ps, once on the roll its really not heavy, the new ferrari steering sytsems really precise and acurate, but so light it could be a 1974 ford.. CF works great in one place, thats seats, lots of weight saving. Wheels would be another. CF diffusers, engine covers intake blades, and interior bits thats more cosmetic and just adds $$$. As to electronic drivers aids. In my experience, yes they are a safety net, but also a double edged sword. It does not take too long before they are fighting you and filtering ability to balance the car. Maybe the ferrari systems are much more complex, so I dont know what I am saying, the only modern ferrari I drove on track was a 599 which felt like a fast bus, and really isloated. The 458 I drove on street also felt isolated. Yeah theyl make the next speciale. But I think we are talking about a more raw and light car like a CS even more so. Two ways to skin the same cat, the 911GT3RS way and the 911R way. Part of the equation is to get far better on track durability and easier cost to run, while avoiding all those superflous add ons that add cost, make a car instantly "collectable" and therefore a garage car. In any event, if ferrari only makes 500 or 1000 speciale replacements, theyre collctables, loaded up wth options, not cars to go to the track and run hard on road. Somethign more raw with a lower customer bandwidth might be more acessable and useable, plus like the 288/F40 I'll bet 20 years later it will be discovered as the one to collect. Sonething off the 4c platform would probably be even better given what a number of us are looking for.
Wouldn't that be great? A 3.0 liter v12 with ~350HP would be awesome in a sub-3000 pound car. Ahh...the old days. I guess I'm old enough now to to pine for them.
I just don't want a car with 500HP+. Probably makes me a *****, but whatever. A 4C with the v6TT maser engine (also in the upcoming 4-door Alfa?) would be perfect for me. As it is, since that isn't offered, the little 4-banger turbo 4C is pretty high on my list. Small, light, agile, fast "enough". That's what I want in a sports car. Not $100k in designer options, $300,000+ price, 3400lbs+, 600HP+ that results in owners barely using the things. [edit - obviously an NA v6 would be way better imho, but I just don't see it happening. A tiny "higher" revving turbo v6 with no more than 400HP would be great in the 4C]
We are agreed. As the Alfa TTV6 is supposedly designed by ferrari and exists that seems the likely candidate assuming the fantasy car is built, and so we get 500hp. As you know the difference between 400hp and 5000 is not linear so its not really that much more. In theory we would all love a really high revving NA v6, but as you say its not happening. Still whatever the final spec, the pieces already exist. The barrier to the 4c based ferrari or vicerla drivers car seems to be Fearraris sucess with "$100k in designer options, $300,000+ price, 3400lbs+, 600HP+ that results in owners barely using the things."