Comparing
the ultimate supercars is much like comparing the various attributes of the
world’s top supermodels: It’s all about what fantasy turns your crank, as
few of us mere mortals will ever get to test drive the cars or date the
models. Those few who own both an Enzo and an F1 will tell you straight-off
that the performance level of either car is so high that only professional
drivers can explore and compare the limits.
THE CHAMP: MCLAREN F1
Developed by McLaren Cars and designer Gordon Murray, the motivation behind
the F1 was to build the best street car ever, regardless of cost. The design
goal was to create the highest power-to-weight ratio possible in a
user-friendly, roadworthy machine. To this end, the McLaren F1 was the first
road car to use a complete carbon fiber chassis and body with lightweight
composites and exotic metals throughout. A magnesium-cast BMW engine mated
to a very lightweight (and very expensive) transverse gearbox further helped
weight savings. The F1 is surprisingly small on the outside, but it actually
seats three people, with two passengers flanking a center-positioned driver.
The driving position is difficult to get used to, but it makes for an ideal
weight distribution. Appropriately, the first two pages of the owner’s
manual are entitled “getting in” and the next two cover “getting out.”
Once you master entry, the McLaren’s controls fall perfectly to hand, with
the shifter to the right at four o’clock. The panoramic view from the
wrap-around windshield and the gauges’ big, bold numbering on a white
background are a study in efficiency. But despite the excellent ergonomics,
the McLaren dash layout and shifter feel dated, especially when compared
with the cutting-edge styling of the Enzo.
Behind the wheel, the steering and brakes are on the heavy side, but with
incredible feedback, as should be expected, while the 6.1-liter V12 gives
staggering performance, with torque that never ends, in any gear, at any
time. Fifth is absolutely usable from 35 mph all the way up to 210—the push
just increases astronomically as the revs rise.
McLaren chose to reject technology like power steering, power-assisted
brakes, anti-lock brakes, traction control, and stability control, all well
known and accessible at the time by virtue of its relationship with the
McLaren Formula One race team. But really, only the ABS is missed—and how—as
it takes a top-level racing driver to feather the brakes on this car in the
wet or a panic situation. Even so, the savings in weight with all the
electronics absent is huge: The F1 weighs a mere 2,500 pounds, vs. 3,230 for
the Enzo.
For all that it “lacks,” the car does incorporate active aerodynamics, with
a pair of lightweight fans that suck air from diffusers under the car so
that no huge rear wing is needed to maintain stability at speed, though a
small tail spoiler does rise to lend some rear downforce. Your greatest fear
when driving an F1 is that the car is simply so good that it eggs you on to
drive faster and faster, entering a performance fantasy land that can bite
back when you exceed your own talents.
THE CHALLENGER: FERRARI ENZO
The Enzo is certainly
Ferrari’s best effort in the supercar wars to date, but it still comes up
second in the running for the fastest car title. Styled by Pininfarina, the
Enzo is built to resemble a Formula One racecar, but without McLaren’s
hell-bent-for-speed attention to maximizing power-to-weight. The result is
that the Enzo tries too hard to merge the design of a road car with an
open-wheeled racer, and at least to my eyes, the styling suffers, especially
when compared to Ferrari’s previous efforts, the much more attractive F40
and F50. As is now standard practice in most supercars, the Enzo’s chassis
is made of carbon fiber, while the bodywork uses a combination of aluminum
and carbon fiber. Huge air intakes allow the Enzo to generate immense
downforce, while a small retractable rear spoiler comes up at speeds in
excess of 100 mph. The cab-forward interior sports lots of carbon fiber, a
semi-automatic six-speed gearbox, launch control, and a variable damping
suspension for luxury cruising.
The Enzo’s 6.0-liter, naturally aspirated V12 can rev to 8,000 rpm, yet 80
percent of its torque comes in at only 3,000. In keeping with the
lightweight theme, its V12 is one of the lightest in the world at just 496
pounds. By comparison, the 427-ci engine in the Cobra weighed 680 pounds.
Stocked with all the latest high-tech gizmos adapted from its own F1 racing
program, the Enzo is a techie’s dream. Advanced technology like stability
control, electronic brake-force distribution, traction control, and ABS keep
the car in check, making it more user-friendly than the McLaren. The Enzo
also has a driver-controlled, up-down lift in the front, which takes the
crunch out of getting in and out of driveways.
Griots
THE PERFORMANCE VERDICT
The numbers tell the story: While the stock F1 has a “mere” 627 hp versus
the Enzo’s 650, and the McLaren must make do with 479 ft-lbs of torque
versus the Ferrari’s 485 (not to mention a redline of just
7,500 rpm for the F1 against the Enzo’s 8k limit), its smaller mass puts the
McLaren out ahead. The Enzo is a leaden 717 pounds heavier than the F1.
The McLaren goes from 0-60 mph in 3.2 seconds; the Ferrari in 3.5 seconds.
The McLaren’s 0-100 mph time is 6.3 seconds, while the Ferrari takes 6.6
seconds. And finally, 0-150 mph in the McLaren takes just 12.8 seconds while
the Ferrari is a few tenths back at 13.1.
The Enzo’s front-end aerodynamics and many high-tech gizmos weigh the car
down to the point that top speed is only an estimated 218 mph, well below
the McLaren’s documented 240 mph. Yes, the F1 is still the fastest road car
of all time, even with its decade-old technology. While the F1’s mid- and
high-speed acceleration easily beats the Enzo, a factor of its much lighter
weight, all who have driven both cars will agree that the huge,
state-of-the-art ceramic disc brakes of the Ferrari easily surpass the
McLaren’s steel brakes.
The McLaren F1 was a successful attempt to build the best road car ever,
regardless of costs, while the Enzo was always intended to make money for
Ferrari, which it most certainly has. This, by its very nature, creates
entirely different production criteria: While the build quality of the Enzo
is good, the McLaren is simply perfect.
Exclusivity is in the F1’s favor as well, with only 64 road-going cars
built, against 399 Enzos (plus six to ten pre-production prototypes that
will eventually find their way into private hands). This makes the ultra
rich buyer’s odds of meeting anther Enzo on the street versus meeting
another F1 a healthy six-to one, causing the Ferrari to seem almost
“common.”
MONEY TALKS
Maintenance costs on both cars are staggering; though doubtless their owners
are not concerned with the shop bills. An F1 will need a new clutch every
3,000 to 6,000 miles, at a cool $12,000. Its $25,000 fuel cell needs
replacing every five years. A starter motor replacement is a 90- hour job,
as the engine has to be removed, and that runs $12,000. Should you break the
transverse transaxle, expect a $100k repair bill.
As for the Enzo, they are all still under warranty but soon enough that will
change and many Ferrari service managers will go shopping for new luxury
boats. Once off warranty, a full brake job with new carbon fiber pads
($2,300 front and $2,100 rear) and rotors ($7,400 each) will be in the
$40,000 range, while a new clutch assembly should cost only a modest $6,000.
The ultimate test of the cars is, of course, the market. The first U.S.-
spec Enzo sold on the private market brought $1,350,000, but prices have
been dropping and the current “ask” is in the $1,150,000 range, while the
actual “sell” is certainly less. In the next few months, almost every
U.S.-spec Enzo is due to pass its one-year, “you-can’t-sell” date imposed by
Ferrari, and I personally know of six owners who are planning on putting
their cars on the market. This will only further drive down prices.
Only a few McLaren F1s change hands every year, with the last recorded sale
at the Christie’s auction in London on Dec. 2, 2003, for $1,257,750. (See
English Profile, page 48.) Christie’s sold another F1 for $961,875 on June
16, 2003. While the Enzo may have the market edge as of this moment, the F1
has clearly passed the test of time, and should appreciate, while the Enzo
loses value, albeit slowly, for the next ten years or so. In the long haul,
the difference in production numbers means the
F1 will always be worth more than the Enzo. How much more? At least 25
percent, in my book.
Both the McLaren F1 and Ferrari Enzo are cars few ever see, let alone drive
or ride in, not to mention own. While I’m a Ferrari guy at heart, it simply
must be said that the F1 is the fastest, most expensive and most exclusive
supercar I’ve ever had the opportunity to drive. And either would certainly
be welcome in my garage.
______________________________________________________________________________________
|