308 vs. Testarossa

Though I know what you guys are getting at, I don't think the Boxer/308/328 are truly "wedge" designs.

If you look at the subtleties of the design of their noses, from the nicely bowed profile, to the dished out or lowered center portion, there is much more to the design than just a door stop shaped wedge as found on other cars of the time like the Countach, 308 GT4, Lotus Esprit, Triumph TR8, etc.

I would consider the Boxer/308/328 to have more of a knife edge look.

When people, who admittedly aren't knowledgeable about exotic cars in general, see my car in person, think the car gorgeous and think it was built relatively recently.

Great design can be from a certain era AND be timeless, that is, attractive in any time. There is no doubt in my mind that these cars fit that description.

-F

 

No. I might have left by then, but mine was the red/tan next to it.

 

I remember having matchbox cars of both. The 308/328 has classic styling and is the best design of its time. But the Testarossa has an aura to it. It screams exotic. It's just a legendary car and the end of an era.
The 308/328 live on in the 458 Italia, but Ferrari doesn't make anything equivalent to the boxer/testarossa anymore.

 

+100000000

 

Jon, I take my hat off and salute your post.

"Hi I'm Robb."

"Hi Robb - says the group sitting in a circle."

"I am a 328 lover. No other car can do it for me in all the categories." Says Robb

"That's ok Robb, we've tried to like others also. Welcome to our support group for those that have reached the end of the journey." - says the group sitting in a circle. "Let's hear from our next owner, Augustine, what would you like to say?"

 

The 308 is a great Ferrari...not great starter Ferrari...great Ferrari. And if you had 9, only the first would be, in your words, the starter. The others are cause they are great

Old Lady? At 25? Sure wish I could find an "old lady" as my next girlfriend -- But then I will be labeled a "dirty old man"...again.

 

Bullfighter has nailed it, as usual.

 

+1

And for the record...that's what I was trying to say

 

The dude got it!

 

Drive a TR, drive a QV, drive a carb'd 308, and a 328. Drive a 355, a BB, and anything else you can get your hands around. Drive a 911, and a newer Vette as well.

Then decide which you like best, and search for the best example of that model you can find.

While maintenance costs should be a factor in the decision, it shouldn't be the only or main factor. If you love the car, you'll find a way to come up with the money for maintenance, or you will learn to do it yourself, or both.

The price appreciation factor should not measure into this decision at all.

You look to be about 60 miles from where I live, if you want to see/drive the best, most gorgeous '84 308QV out there you're more than welcome to come by.

Also, peruse the NYC part of F-Chat, the Jersey and NYC guys have quite a few get togethers especially this time of year, and you can see an assortment of cars up close and talk with their owners. I've met them a couple times and they are a really nice group of people.

Phil

 

Wedge? This doesn't look like a wedge does it?
Image Unavailable, Please Login

 

No wedge here. Just very beautiful flowing lines. Nothing to see. Move along. Move along. I agree the lotus esprit taking that trophy.

 

The reluctant second gear hasn't changed! it's not as hard as in the 328 so I still skip it for the first five minutes or so.

 

Great post, especially from my perspective of trying to decide between a 328 and a 360. As I mull the options, I keep returning to the 328, the fantasy car of my teen years. The newer 360 with its F1 transmission, more luxurious interior, and greater performance would be nice, but for me it's about fulfilling a dream, and no car would do that like a 328. So, I most likely will go with that when I buy. I originally thought that the car would be my "starter" Ferrari that I would sell to trade up with, but the more I think about it, it will probably be difficult to part with the car after owning it. Maybe I'll just have to get a larger garage so I can get her a sister.

Oh, and you guys may be interested to know that old Ferrari's aren't the only cars that are difficult to shift into 2nd with -- my '07 Vantage has the same problem in cold weather. I like to call such quirks "character."

 

I agree with pretty much everything Jon said with a slight adjustment to the above. If what you really want is a modern car and you buy a 308/328 to "have a Ferrari" then you'll probably be disappointed. However if you love all the cars and want to enjoy lots of different models, you can buy and enjoy a 308/328. Then when it's time to move up, they will repay you with excellent resale that is IMHO going to go up over the next five years. They are a great way to "drive your money" while looking at newer cars down the road. A TR is debatable because their values have fallen so far. Their values might go up but running costs will be higher. But you should still get your purchase price back when it's time to sell.

BTW my 308 from cold shifts pretty well into all the gears and gets better as it gets warm. Compared to my 928 it is Honda-smooth. IMO those who knock the shifting are used to speed-shifting or powershifting some modern box up the drag strip. Treat it properly with a slight pause between the gears, and it will shift from cold just fine.

I've also driven a number of flappy-paddle gearboxes (Ferrari F1, Maser Cambio, BMW DSG, Porsche PDK, Audi and VW) and they do nothing for me. I keep trying them and just can't stand it, totally boring to drive on the street, appeals to the video game generation I guess. The last was a new Cayman PDK and it was impressive but completely boring. Stick with a nice mechanical gearbox and enjoy driving the car.

 

I love the classic cars and the modern ones. In my mind, they're kind of like apples and oranges, different categories. That's why, in a better world, I'd have both. Maybe someday.

As far as the newer cars and the F1 transmission, I've never driven one so I can't say I wouldn't hate it also. That said, driving a car that can go from 0-60 in around 4 seconds and shift in about 100-200 milliseconds excites me. For me, the performance that is possible with the flappy paddles (thank you, Mr. Clarkson) is what's appealing, not the novelty of shifting without using a stick. Also, I must admit that being able to put the car in automatic has its appeal too, like when you're stuck in Atlanta traffic or if you ever need your girlfriend/wife to drive the car for some reason (and hopefully, that reason doesn't arise very often).

As for the original point of the thread (and sorry that we've digressed a bit), I personally would go with a 3x8 over a TR. I'm not sure which will hold/increase its value better but, in my very humble opinion, the TR is indelibly linked to Miami Vice and the 80s, and that's not a good thing. Then again, it's a matter of personal taste and maybe I'm alone in feeling that way. If you like the car and want a V12 then go for it.

 

It really was a hell of a post.

IMHO that's the right philosophy. If/when I next move a bigger garage is a priority.

 

Not a good thing? And the 308 is linked to Magnum, so is that any better, PAL!!!

Sonny Crockett

 

I gotta chime in - I love pretty much all Ferrari's. The way they're built, designed, drive. The topic here is TR's and 308's. I think the TR is fantastic. I drove the F512M around and thought it was awesome, I've also driven an early TR and felt it was great imho: I look at the 308, and the only thing that can distract from the awe of overwhelming beauty is the Lusso, 365GTB/4, 275GT, and the Dino's. I love the BB too for its 308-esque lines and that magnificent flat-12 engine.

As for "starter Ferrari", I think the Fiat X1/9 with its 4 cyl, electronic ignition, $10 a piece brake rotors contained by a very stylish Bertone body is a tough act to follow.

 

My apologies if I've offended you, Scaledetails! We all have our opinions and that's just mine.

 

Not a problem

 

I gotta chime in - I love pretty much all Ferrari's. The way they're built, designed, drive. The topic here is TR's and 308's. I think the TR is fantastic. I drove the F512M around and thought it was awesome, I've also driven an early TR and felt it was great imho: I look at the 308, and the only thing that can distract from the awe of overwhelming beauty is the Lusso, 365GTB/4, 275GT, and the Dino's. I love the BB too for its 308-esque lines and that magnificent flat-12 engine.

As for "starter Ferrari", I think the Fiat X1/9 with its 4 cyl, electronic ignition, $10 a piece brake rotors contained by a very stylish Bertone body is a tough act to follow.

 

Funny how it's the exterior that is getting so much mention. It's the interior of the TR that makes it easy for me to not compare the two. It has that rectangular lense to house the instrumentation which is far from the 308 gauge cluster, not to mention the other switches. This, for me, separates the two from comparison because the contemporary form of the TR's interior places it in a different category in my mind. Oh yeah it is a hot car, but it is too far evolved to compare in my mind.

 

Seeing a TR drop in price to what a 308 QV is going for, is normal.

New cars depreciate and old cars appreciate. It's a cycle that shouldn't surprise anyone - especially car guys.

Thirty years from now, a depreciating 458 Italia will drop to what an appreciating 355 is going for.

Look where the 246 Dino was 20 years ago, and look at it today

 

I think Stephane was doing a pretty good impersonation of Sonny Crockett, not attacking you. And how dare you disparage Miami Vice and Magnum P.I.? Two of the greatest shows ever!